Re: [Discuss] Defining Cloud Bursting Pattens in Application Policy

2015-03-06 Thread Dakshika Jayathilaka
< >> shahh...@cisco.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> LGTM >>> >>> -- >>> *From:* Imesh Gunaratne [im...@apache.org] >>> *Sent:* 04 March 2015 11:59 >>> *To:* dev; Shaheedur Haque (shahhaqu); Lakmal War

Re: [Discuss] Defining Cloud Bursting Pattens in Application Policy

2015-03-06 Thread Rajkumar Rajaratnam
r Haque (shahhaqu); Lakmal Warusawithana >> *Subject:* [Discuss] Defining Cloud Bursting Pattens in Application >> Policy >> >> Hi Devs, >> >> Shaheed raised an issue related to Application Policy definition where >> we define an attribute called

Re: [Discuss] Defining Cloud Bursting Pattens in Application Policy

2015-03-05 Thread Imesh Gunaratne
ur Haque (shahhaqu); Lakmal Warusawithana > *Subject:* [Discuss] Defining Cloud Bursting Pattens in Application Policy > > Hi Devs, > > Shaheed raised an issue related to Application Policy definition where > we define an attribute called "activeByDefault" to mark th

RE: [Discuss] Defining Cloud Bursting Pattens in Application Policy

2015-03-05 Thread Shaheedur Haque (shahhaqu)
LGTM From: Imesh Gunaratne [im...@apache.org] Sent: 04 March 2015 11:59 To: dev; Shaheedur Haque (shahhaqu); Lakmal Warusawithana Subject: [Discuss] Defining Cloud Bursting Pattens in Application Policy Hi Devs, Shaheed raised an issue related to

Re: [Discuss] Defining Cloud Bursting Pattens in Application Policy

2015-03-04 Thread Rajkumar Rajaratnam
Hi Imesh, I have now moved the application policies to global level and implemented APIs to manage application policies. These changes are available in master branch now. However I haven't changed the application policy schema yet. I will change the schema once everyone agree to the proposed schem

[Discuss] Defining Cloud Bursting Pattens in Application Policy

2015-03-04 Thread Imesh Gunaratne
Hi Devs, Shaheed raised an issue related to Application Policy definition where we define an attribute called "activeByDefault" to mark the network partitions which will be used for initially spawning application instances. The concern was to either remove this attribute and only send the active