<
>> shahh...@cisco.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> LGTM
>>>
>>> --
>>> *From:* Imesh Gunaratne [im...@apache.org]
>>> *Sent:* 04 March 2015 11:59
>>> *To:* dev; Shaheedur Haque (shahhaqu); Lakmal War
r Haque (shahhaqu); Lakmal Warusawithana
>> *Subject:* [Discuss] Defining Cloud Bursting Pattens in Application
>> Policy
>>
>> Hi Devs,
>>
>> Shaheed raised an issue related to Application Policy definition where
>> we define an attribute called
ur Haque (shahhaqu); Lakmal Warusawithana
> *Subject:* [Discuss] Defining Cloud Bursting Pattens in Application Policy
>
> Hi Devs,
>
> Shaheed raised an issue related to Application Policy definition where
> we define an attribute called "activeByDefault" to mark th
LGTM
From: Imesh Gunaratne [im...@apache.org]
Sent: 04 March 2015 11:59
To: dev; Shaheedur Haque (shahhaqu); Lakmal Warusawithana
Subject: [Discuss] Defining Cloud Bursting Pattens in Application Policy
Hi Devs,
Shaheed raised an issue related to
Hi Imesh,
I have now moved the application policies to global level and implemented
APIs to manage application policies. These changes are available in master
branch now. However I haven't changed the application policy schema yet. I
will change the schema once everyone agree to the proposed schem
Hi Devs,
Shaheed raised an issue related to Application Policy definition where we
define an attribute called "activeByDefault" to mark the network partitions
which will be used for initially spawning application instances.
The concern was to either remove this attribute and only send the active
