@Shaheed: We would like to get your feedback on this?
Thanks
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Vishanth Balasubramaniam wrote:
> I feel naming from "partitionAlgo" to "algorithm" would be fine
>
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:34 AM, Imesh Gunaratne wrote:
>
>> If everyone agrees, I would like to pro
I feel naming from "partitionAlgo" to "algorithm" would be fine
On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:34 AM, Imesh Gunaratne wrote:
> If everyone agrees, I would like to propose to rename "partitionAlgo" to
> "algorithm" as we have done in application policy to define the network
> partition algorithm. WDYT?
If everyone agrees, I would like to propose to rename "partitionAlgo" to
"algorithm" as we have done in application policy to define the network
partition algorithm. WDYT?
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam
wrote:
> Hi Devs,
>
> I have done two minor changes in deployment polic
Hi Devs,
I have done two minor changes in deployment policy schema.
1. renamed max to partitionMax in partition reference section, in-order
to be compatible with 4.0.0 artifact.
2. renamed networkPartition to networkPartitions (plural)
This is the new deployment policy schema.
{
"id
