Re: Changes to deployment policy schema

2015-03-08 Thread Imesh Gunaratne
@Shaheed: We would like to get your feedback on this? Thanks On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Vishanth Balasubramaniam wrote: > I feel naming from "partitionAlgo" to "algorithm" would be fine > > On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:34 AM, Imesh Gunaratne wrote: > >> If everyone agrees, I would like to pro

Re: Changes to deployment policy schema

2015-03-08 Thread Vishanth Balasubramaniam
I feel naming from "partitionAlgo" to "algorithm" would be fine On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:34 AM, Imesh Gunaratne wrote: > If everyone agrees, I would like to propose to rename "partitionAlgo" to > "algorithm" as we have done in application policy to define the network > partition algorithm. WDYT?

Re: Changes to deployment policy schema

2015-03-06 Thread Imesh Gunaratne
If everyone agrees, I would like to propose to rename "partitionAlgo" to "algorithm" as we have done in application policy to define the network partition algorithm. WDYT? On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam wrote: > Hi Devs, > > I have done two minor changes in deployment polic

Changes to deployment policy schema

2015-03-06 Thread Rajkumar Rajaratnam
Hi Devs, I have done two minor changes in deployment policy schema. 1. renamed max to partitionMax in partition reference section, in-order to be compatible with 4.0.0 artifact. 2. renamed networkPartition to networkPartitions (plural) This is the new deployment policy schema. { "id