Re: Service Grouping and Composite Application Deployment

2014-07-07 Thread Lakmal Warusawithana
Hi Alex, Thanks for bringing up this. IFAIK, couple of devs looked at CAMP, and its really comprehensive spec. But IMHO, fully adopting to CAMP may be bit harder. Stratos has already implemented some of them and writing for CAMP is not such easy. But we have looked at CAMP when we started this gro

Re: Service Grouping and Composite Application Deployment

2014-07-07 Thread Nirmal Fernando
Thanks for bringing this up Alex. There're few people in the list who had a look at the CAMP spec. I totally agree, that we should leverage existing implementations such as Brooklyn. On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 2:47 AM, Alex Heneveld < alex.henev...@cloudsoftcorp.com> wrote: > > Hi folks, > > // cros

Re: Service Grouping and Composite Application Deployment

2014-07-07 Thread Lahiru Sandaruwan
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Udara Liyanage wrote: > HI Lahiru, > > As I understood, SM sends the details to the CC via service call or event > based, then CC update the topology and publish topology events. > If so, Autoscaler does not need to get any information from the event published by

Re: Service Grouping and Composite Application Deployment

2014-07-07 Thread Udara Liyanage
HI Lahiru, As I understood, SM sends the details to the CC via service call or event based, then CC update the topology and publish topology events. On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Lahiru Sandaruwan wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 9:39 PM, Isuru Haththotuwa > wrote: > >> Hi Imesh, >> >>

Re: Service Grouping and Composite Application Deployment

2014-07-07 Thread Lahiru Sandaruwan
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 9:39 PM, Isuru Haththotuwa wrote: > Hi Imesh, > > Yes, completely agree. Should have the proper documentation for this. Will > do that once we have the basic version of this feature done. > > Hi Lahiru, > > On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Lahiru Sandaruwan > wrote: > >> Hi

Re: Service Grouping and Composite Application Deployment

2014-07-07 Thread Alex Heneveld
Hi folks, // cross-post stratos and brooklyn mailing lists Two suggestions. First one is that Stratos should look at adopting at least one of these official specs -- CAMP or TOSCA -- now rather than later. Both have matured a lot in recent months and would suit the purpose nicely from what

RE: Service Grouping and Composite Application Deployment

2014-07-07 Thread Martin Eppel (meppel)
Great Thanks Martin From: isu...@wso2.com [mailto:isu...@wso2.com] On Behalf Of Isuru Haththotuwa Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2014 9:22 AM To: dev Cc: Martin Eppel (meppel); Lakmal Warusawithana Subject: Re: Service Grouping and Composite Application Deployment For the initial implementation for

Re: Service Grouping and Composite Application Deployment

2014-07-06 Thread Isuru Haththotuwa
Hi Imesh, Yes, completely agree. Should have the proper documentation for this. Will do that once we have the basic version of this feature done. Hi Lahiru, On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Lahiru Sandaruwan wrote: > Hi Isuru, > > Any reason why we use MB for subscription event? We can use dire

Re: Service Grouping and Composite Application Deployment

2014-07-06 Thread Lahiru Sandaruwan
Hi Isuru, Any reason why we use MB for subscription event? We can use direct service call to CC IMO. Thanks. On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Isuru Haththotuwa wrote: > Hi Devs, > > This is an addition to the discussion happened in the thread [1]. I have > included a very basic sequence diagr

Re: Service Grouping and Composite Application Deployment

2014-07-06 Thread Imesh Gunaratne
Hi Isuru, Thanks for the quick response. >However, as we go along we might find that we don't need everything in the proposal/ there additional functionality required. May be not in this document but IMO the complete Composite Application Model should be there in the documentation. Thanks On

Re: Service Grouping and Composite Application Deployment

2014-07-04 Thread Isuru Haththotuwa
Hi Imesh, On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 7:46 PM, Imesh Gunaratne wrote: > [Added Sanjiva to the list] > > Hi All, > > IMO this composite application model is really important for the future of > Stratos and it will become the foundation for all other features. Therefore > we need to make sure that it

Re: Service Grouping and Composite Application Deployment

2014-07-04 Thread Imesh Gunaratne
[Added Sanjiva to the list] Hi All, IMO this composite application model is really important for the future of Stratos and it will become the foundation for all other features. Therefore we need to make sure that it is simple, easy to understand, covers all currently available requirements and ea

Re: Service Grouping and Composite Application Deployment

2014-07-03 Thread Isuru Haththotuwa
For the initial implementation for persisting Service Group Definitions, the functionality will cover: 1. Nested Service Groups 2. Validation of the availability of referred Service Groups and Cartridges I have copy-pasted two sample Service Group definitions [1, 2] below. [2] is a nested group.