Re: Two different naming conventions for CEP 300 and CEP 301

Hi Akila, I have added a unit test called ThriftStatisticsPublisherTest in the same p/r. Thanks. On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Akila Ravihansa Perera wrote: > Hi Thanuja, > > I've added more comments, please check. Could you write a simple unit test > to assert whether dataPublisherHolders

Re: Two different naming conventions for CEP 300 and CEP 301

Hi Thanuja, I've added more comments, please check. Could you write a simple unit test to assert whether dataPublisherHolders and receiverGroups objects are populated correctly? Thanks. On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Thanuja Uruththirakodeeswaran < thanu...@wso2.com> wrote: > Please review an

Re: Two different naming conventions for CEP 300 and CEP 301

Please review and merge this p/r [1]. [1]. https://github.com/apache/stratos/pull/496 Thanks. On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Gayan Gunarathne wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Thanuja Uruththirakodeeswaran < > thanu...@wso2.com> wrote: > >> Fixed it with commit [1]. >> >> [1]. >>

Re: Two different naming conventions for CEP 300 and CEP 301

On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Thanuja Uruththirakodeeswaran < thanu...@wso2.com> wrote: > Fixed it with commit [1]. > > [1]. > https://github.com/Thanu/stratos/commit/c5df03d3e6a8bab930518f69baa62aae88a5bcbe > Great. Could you please send a PR for this? Thanks, Gayan > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015

Re: Two different naming conventions for CEP 300 and CEP 301

Fixed it with commit [1]. [1]. https://github.com/Thanu/stratos/commit/c5df03d3e6a8bab930518f69baa62aae88a5bcbe On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Akila Ravihansa Perera wrote: > IMO, it should be "cep310" (instead of "cep.310") > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Gayan Gunarathne > wrote: >

Re: Two different naming conventions for CEP 300 and CEP 301

IMO, it should be "cep310" (instead of "cep.310") On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Gayan Gunarathne wrote: > /s/cep301/cep310 > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Gayan Gunarathne > wrote: > >> I found the $subject for CEP300[1] and CEP301[2]. What is the ration >> behind that or is that a mi

Re: Two different naming conventions for CEP 300 and CEP 301

/s/cep301/cep310 On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Gayan Gunarathne wrote: > I found the $subject for CEP300[1] and CEP301[2]. What is the ration > behind that or is that a mistake? > > [1] > https://github.com/apache/stratos/blob/stratos-4.1.x/extensions/cep/modules/stratos-cep-extension/wso2ce

Two different naming conventions for CEP 300 and CEP 301

I found the $subject for CEP300[1] and CEP301[2]. What is the ration behind that or is that a mistake? [1] https://github.com/apache/stratos/blob/stratos-4.1.x/extensions/cep/modules/stratos-cep-extension/wso2cep-3.0.0/pom.xml#L30 [2] https://github.com/apache/stratos/blob/stratos-4.1.x/extensions