Re: Springcleaning Branch + Discussion

2014-04-07 Thread Steve Blackmon
The branch contains miscellaneous cleanup to poms, a pig runtime binding, and a few new modules. I think the branch could be merged - I will solicit a group review and vote soon. This is the first time I'm moved around modules others had created, in the spirit of organization and naming consisten

Re: Springcleaning Branch + Discussion

2014-04-07 Thread Matt Franklin
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Chris Geer wrote: > Ah, was looking here. > > https://github.com/apache/streams > > Why two different repos? > My guess is that when we converted to git, INFRA did not disable the SVN mirror. > > > On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Matt Franklin >wrote: > > > On

Re: Springcleaning Branch + Discussion

2014-04-07 Thread Chris Geer
Ah, was looking here. https://github.com/apache/streams Why two different repos? On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Matt Franklin wrote: > On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Chris Geer wrote: > > > I'm not seeing that branch @ github. Which one are you referring to? > > > > https://github.com/apach

Re: Springcleaning Branch + Discussion

2014-04-07 Thread Matt Franklin
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Chris Geer wrote: > I'm not seeing that branch @ github. Which one are you referring to? > https://github.com/apache/incubator-streams/tree/springcleaning > > > On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Matt Franklin >wrote: > > > What is the status of the Spring Cleanin

Re: Springcleaning Branch + Discussion

2014-04-07 Thread Chris Geer
I'm not seeing that branch @ github. Which one are you referring to? On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Matt Franklin wrote: > What is the status of the Spring Cleaning branch? I see a lot of work going > on there, but don't see the issue it is associated with? > > Everything I see looks like it is

Springcleaning Branch + Discussion

2014-04-07 Thread Matt Franklin
What is the status of the Spring Cleaning branch? I see a lot of work going on there, but don't see the issue it is associated with? Everything I see looks like it is great, but I think we need to increase the communication around some of these major efforts.

Re: [jira] [Commented] (STREAMS-26) Create a framework to run an Activity stream in a single JVM

2014-04-07 Thread Ryan Ebanks
That branch should not be necessary anymore. The 'springcleaning' branch should be the most up to date branch in regards to the local runtime. On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Matt Franklin (JIRA) wrote: > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STREAMS-26?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.

[jira] [Commented] (STREAMS-26) Create a framework to run an Activity stream in a single JVM

2014-04-07 Thread Matt Franklin (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STREAMS-26?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13962307#comment-13962307 ] Matt Franklin commented on STREAMS-26: -- Is this complete? > Create a framework to ru