DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29197] - PropertyMessageResources behaviour different from PropertyResourceBundle

2004-06-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29798] -

2004-06-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29798] New: -

2004-06-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29589] - FormFile is not throwing FileNotFoundException when file doesn't exist

2004-06-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29515] - EmptyTag does not worth with Arrays

2004-06-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29796] New: - generates bad js method id's with ActionValidator Form

2004-06-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29515] - EmptyTag does not worth with Arrays

2004-06-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29792] - Action method saveErrors lose messages on chained actions

2004-06-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29792] - Action method saveErrors lose messages on chained actions

2004-06-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29776] - [PATCH] Update Validator Example to mirror changes

2004-06-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/web/examples/WEB-INF/validator validation.xml

2004-06-24 Thread husted
husted 2004/06/24 17:56:13 Modified:web/blank/WEB-INF validation.xml web/example/WEB-INF validation.xml web/examples/WEB-INF/validator validation.xml Log: Apply #29776 " Update Validator Example to mirror changes" submitted by Danny Mui Revision C

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29668] - unicode (any non ISO-8859-1 encoding) text fields in "multipart/form-data" form are sent inncorrect

2004-06-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29589] - FormFile is not throwing FileNotFoundException when file doesn't exist

2004-06-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29575] - html:image tag throws "bean not found" exception

2004-06-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29515] - EmptyTag does not worth with Arrays

2004-06-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29443] - html tags need bundle attribute

2004-06-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29197] - PropertyMessageResources behaviour different from PropertyResourceBundle

2004-06-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28983] - Unimplemented Servlet 2.3 methods in MultipartRequestWrapper

2004-06-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide release-notes.xml

2004-06-24 Thread husted
husted 2004/06/24 17:19:18 Modified:doc/userGuide release-notes.xml Log: Remove premature link. Revision ChangesPath 1.52 +1 -2 jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide/release-notes.xml Index: release-notes.xml ==

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28788] - Broken link "changelog reports" in release-notes

2004-06-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28759] - Precompling Struts Web Apps with Weblogic

2004-06-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Struts-Faces] wrapping a HttpServletRequest

2004-06-24 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Hi, i tried the faces-struts-lib with RI. It works. But not with Open-Source-Implementation *MyFaces*. i notices, that in struts-faces the servletPath is a *.do (or that for struts). But it must be an faces-mapping for servlet-Path (*.faces e.g.) the FacesRequestProcessor know if request is for A

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29429] - allow '_' (underscore) in validwhen identifier

2004-06-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/validator/validwhen ValidWhenParser.g

2004-06-24 Thread husted
husted 2004/06/24 16:51:52 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/validator/validwhen ValidWhenParser.g Log: Apply #29429 "allow '_' (underscore) in validwhen identifier" submitted by rv Revision ChangesPath 1.6 +4 -4 jakarta-struts/src/

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29422] - Bug with textarea content in a multipart form

2004-06-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29343] - NPE while trying to use Struts 1.1. with Xerces 2.6.2

2004-06-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26322] - WebLogic hot-deploy breaks Tiles; TilesRequestProcessor is not serializable

2004-06-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/actions RedeployableActionServlet.java

2004-06-24 Thread husted
husted 2004/06/24 16:38:16 Added: src/share/org/apache/struts/actions RedeployableActionServlet.java Log: Apply #26322 - WebLogic hot-deploy breaks Tiles; TilesRequestProcessor is not serializable - Renaud Waldura, Justin Ashworth, YuJeong Kim, et al.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29792] New: - Action method saveErrors lose messages on chained actions

2004-06-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsArticles

2004-06-24 Thread dev
Date: 2004-06-24T12:17:35 Editor: 209.101.199.82 <> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: StrutsArticles URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsArticles no comment Change Log: -- @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -Articles th

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsArticles

2004-06-24 Thread dev
Date: 2004-06-24T12:16:41 Editor: 209.101.199.82 <> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: StrutsArticles URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsArticles no comment Change Log: -- @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ Articles th

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsArticles

2004-06-24 Thread dev
Date: 2004-06-24T12:12:58 Editor: 209.101.199.82 <> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: StrutsArticles URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsArticles no comment Change Log: -- @@ -1 +1,3 @@ Articles that

[Apache Struts Wiki] New: StrutsArticles

2004-06-24 Thread dev
Date: 2004-06-24T12:06:31 Editor: 209.101.199.82 <> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: StrutsArticles URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsArticles no comment New Page: Articles that cover Struts. - To unsubsc

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: FrontPage

2004-06-24 Thread dev
Date: 2004-06-24T12:05:45 Editor: 209.101.199.82 <> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: FrontPage URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/FrontPage no comment Change Log: -- @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ For more informatio

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29787] - Emailvalidation doesn't accept umlauts and the new generic top level domain names

2004-06-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29787] - Emailvalidation doesn't accept umlauts and the new generic top level domain names

2004-06-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29787] New: - Emailvalidation doesn't accept umlauts and the new generic top level domain names

2004-06-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Re: PATCH: html:cancel tag. Made a javascript version for submitt ing

2004-06-24 Thread Marcus Breese
But what about when the V directly communicates with the C? This all started with the cancel tag. It is very much a struts specific tag that tells the controller that the action should be cancelled. So, in this case, the taglib is required by the controller. Otherwise, a different mechanism wil

RE: PATCH: html:cancel tag. Made a javascript version for submitt ing

2004-06-24 Thread Ted Husted
> Oh well, I guess I'll look elsewhere for a framework. If you can only use a framework that only bundles everything into one monothlitic distribution, then yes you should. We tried that, and it is clearly not working. If monolithic is the only way we could do things in the future, then I would

Re: PATCH: html:cancel tag. Made a javascript version for submitt ing

2004-06-24 Thread Vic Cekvenich
Don Brown wrote: Please, someone fork the taglibs! :) By forking taglibs to a separate jar after some release, seems like a win win. Chains is the direction, that works for it becuase it tells comunity the focus is on C of MVC. Taglibs you can get from display tag, struts memnu, etc. .V -

RE: PATCH: html:cancel tag. Made a javascript version for submitt ing

2004-06-24 Thread Edgar P Dollin
> Personally, I don't plan to write a set of custom tags for > Struts 2.0. I would expect Struts 2.0 to be written in such a > way that custom tags (or Velocity tools) are not needed. But > if they were needed, and someone wrote a set that was popular > within our community, then I would consid

RE: PATCH: html:cancel tag. Made a javascript version for submitt ing

2004-06-24 Thread Ted Husted
It's been our plan to reorganize Struts into several subprojects. Each subproject will be a separate distribution, as Commons-Collections, Common-BeanUtils, Common-Validator, and so forth, are separate distributions today. This will allow us to make fixes to the struts-core, or the struts-tags,

Re: PATCH: html:cancel tag. Made a javascript version for submitting

2004-06-24 Thread Ted Husted
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:52:23 -0700 (PDT), David Graham wrote: > IMO, Struts 2.0 is a good time to leave the old tags (defined as > ones with JSTL replacements) behind. Struts 1.x apps would still > have them available but 2.x apps would use the JSTL. I consider it > a disservice to the communtity

RE: Struts 1.2.1 release?

2004-06-24 Thread Ted Husted
The dependency in question is just the Commons Validator. The only problem there has been finding a release manager. The c-v branch slated for 1.1.3 has been stable for some time. I stepped in to help out with that, and there's a alpha commons-validator in my home directory (http://www.apache.or

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29004] - ActionValidatorForms cause badly formed validator javascript

2004-06-24 Thread Joe Hertz
I'm not sure I know what to say here. Is Struts 1.2.1 really going to ship with a validator that does not maintain backwards compatibility with Struts 1.1? Should I just go ahead an enter a separate bug for the js function naming issue? > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ma