[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsRelease123

Date: 2004-09-03T21:53:34 Editor: MartinCooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: StrutsRelease123 URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease123 no comment Change Log: -- @@ -81,7

Re: Struts-el and Maven for the next release

On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 16:05:15 -0700, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 14:35:30 -0500, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I just wanted to point out that a 1.2.2 version of struts-el wasn't > > published to the iBiblio repository -- very easy to overlook. > > > >

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsRelease123

Date: 2004-09-03T20:29:39 Editor: MartinCooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: StrutsRelease123 URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease123 no comment Change Log: -- @@ -38,7

Re: Roadmap was (Re: [VOTE] Move minimum to 2.3 ..)

On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 07:11:48 -0400, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, to sum up what people seem to be saying here: > > [Struts 1.2.x] > > * The minimums for 1.2.3 will remain Servlet 2.2 > > * We create a branch at the 1.2.3 tag, in case we need to make critical fixes to > 1.2.x later

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/contrib/struts-el project.xml

martinc 2004/09/03 18:17:25 Modified:contrib/struts-el project.xml Log: Update the build version to 1.2.3, and the Struts dependency to 1.2.3. Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +2 -2 jakarta-struts/contrib/struts-el/project.xml Index: project.xml

Re: [PROPOSAL] Migrate Struts to Subversion

On Fri, 3 Sep 2004, Don Brown wrote: I propose we migrate our current CVS repository to Subversion as soon as the infrastructure team is available to assist, giving at least a week to ensure all outstanding CVS commits are made. A test Subversion migration has already been created and tested w

Re: Release Notes for 1.2.3

We weren't using them to automatically generate the Release Notes. We're using them to give us a leg-up on the manual updates. I last did them on August 13, and not much has changed since then. -Ted. On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 15:59:28 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote: > Since we're using Maven to generate

Re: Struts-el and Maven for the next release

On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 14:35:30 -0500, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just wanted to point out that a 1.2.2 version of struts-el wasn't > published to the iBiblio repository -- very easy to overlook. > > From the Maven side, we should try to do these things as part of > tagging and buildi

Release Notes for 1.2.3

Since we're using Maven to generate Release Note info these days (at least as I understand it), and my Maven config is still messed up, is someone else available to update the release notes prior to the 6pm cut-off today? I realise this is rather short notice, to say the least - the Maven issue did

Re: [PROPOSAL] Migrate Struts to Subversion

+1 I am really tired of cvs losing the history of files/directories when you rename them. David --- Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I propose we migrate our current CVS repository to Subversion as soon as > > the infrastructure team is available to assist, giving at least a week > to e

Re: [PROPOSAL] Migrate Struts to Subversion

On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 16:23:57 -0400, Don Brown wrote: > I propose we migrate our current CVS repository to Subversion as > soon as the infrastructure team is available to assist , giving at > least a week to ensure all outstanding CVS commits are made. +1 On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 13:13:47 -0700, Craig

Re: [PROPOSAL] Migrate Struts to Subversion

On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 16:23:57 -0400, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I propose we migrate our current CVS repository to Subversion as soon as > the infrastructure team is available to assist, giving at least a week > to ensure all outstanding CVS commits are made. A test Subversion > migrati

[PROPOSAL] Migrate Struts to Subversion

I propose we migrate our current CVS repository to Subversion as soon as the infrastructure team is available to assist, giving at least a week to ensure all outstanding CVS commits are made. A test Subversion migration has already been created and tested with positive feedback. This proposal

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26413] - Indexed Field Date Validation Allows Invalid Dates

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Subversion?

On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 15:31:04 -0400, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Last I heard, Ted setup a test subversion repository and everyone seemed > happy with it. Is there anything stopping plans to go ahead and migrate > our CVS repository? That's a MME (merely a matter of effort :-) task. I'

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/validator FieldChecks.java

niallp 2004/09/03 13:11:19 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/validator FieldChecks.java Log: Fix empty Validator results map caused by Bug 26413 patch - reported by Casey Forbes Revision ChangesPath 1.20 +36 -35 jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/val

Struts-el and Maven for the next release

I just wanted to point out that a 1.2.2 version of struts-el wasn't published to the iBiblio repository -- very easy to overlook. From the Maven side, we should try to do these things as part of tagging and building Struts 1.2.3: 1) update the version number in jakarta-struts/project.xml 2) do

Subversion?

Last I heard, Ted setup a test subversion repository and everyone seemed happy with it. Is there anything stopping plans to go ahead and migrate our CVS repository? I've recently setup several subversion installations and am willing to do whatever it takes to get Struts migrated. Let me kno

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsRelease123

Date: 2004-09-03T11:26:29 Editor: NiallPemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: StrutsRelease123 URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease123 no comment Change Log: -- @@ -25,

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29429] - allow '_' (underscore) in validwhen identifier

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24497] - validwhen / underscore in field names

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/test/org/apache/struts/validator PojoBean.java TestValidWhen.java

niallp 2004/09/03 11:12:26 Modified:.build-tests.xml Added: src/test/org/apache/struts/validator PojoBean.java TestValidWhen.java Log: Add Test Cases for ValidWhen parser Revision ChangesPath 1.26 +4 -0 jakarta-struts/bui

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31026] - validwhen bugs

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31025] - validwhenparser null pointer exception

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/validator/validwhen ValidWhenLexer.java ValidWhenParser.g ValidWhenParser.java

niallp 2004/09/03 11:06:58 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/validator/validwhen ValidWhenLexer.java ValidWhenParser.g ValidWhenParser.java Log: Fixed ValidWhen Bugs 31025 and 31026 reported by Gisella Saavedra Revision Change

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/test/org/apache/struts/validator - New directory

niallp 2004/09/03 11:04:53 jakarta-struts/src/test/org/apache/struts/validator - New directory - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [VOTE] Move minimum to 2.3 (was Re: Changing how CommonsMultipartRequestHandler handles text parameters?)

Wow, didn't know about that one - quite interesting. What about pushing it out to the wiki? I can probably do it (and learn some wiki stuff) if Ted or anyone else doesn't mind. \Anders > -Original Message- > From: James Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 2. september 2004 21:33

RE: [VOTE] Move minimum to 2.3 (was Re: Changing how CommonsMultipartRequestHandler handles text parameters?)

Wow, didn't know about that one - quite interesting. What about pushing it out to the wiki? I can probably do it (and learn some wiki stuff) if Ted or anyone else doesn't mind. \Anders > -Original Message- > From: James Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 2. september 2004 21:33

Re: [VOTE] Move minimum to 2.3 (was Re: Changing how CommonsMultipartRequestHandler handles text parameters?)

On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 06:29:59 -0700 (PDT), David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Either it could be developed with compatibility to existing JDK versions > > and > > keep everyone happy. or go with JDK 1.5 and my preferernce would be to > > go to > > JDK 1.5 and use all those favorite-new-fe

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26413] - Indexed Field Date Validation Allows Invalid Dates

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31049] - new tag to handle relation (html )

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31049] - new tag to handle relation (html )

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31049] - new tag to handle relation (html )

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31049] - new tag to handle relation (html )

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31049] New: - new tag to handle relation (html )

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] Move minimum to 2.3 (was Re: Changing how CommonsMultipartRequestHandler handles text parameters?)

> Either it could be developed with compatibility to existing JDK versions > and > keep everyone happy. or go with JDK 1.5 and my preferernce would be to > go to > JDK 1.5 and use all those favorite-new-features. In the past we have required the Java version that the Servlet spec required. Why w

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31034] - use of wildcard in tiles-defs.xml as for wildcard mappings

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Roadmap was (Re: [VOTE] Move minimum to 2.3 ..)

IMO, FWIW ... Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 09/03/2004 07:11:48 AM: > OK, to sum up what people seem to be saying here: > > [Struts 1.2.x] > > * The minimums for 1.2.3 will remain Servlet 2.2 > > * We create a branch at the 1.2.3 tag, in case we need to make > critical fixes to 1

Roadmap was (Re: [VOTE] Move minimum to 2.3 ..)

OK, to sum up what people seem to be saying here: [Struts 1.2.x] * The minimums for 1.2.3 will remain Servlet 2.2 * We create a branch at the 1.2.3 tag, in case we need to make critical fixes to 1.2.x later. [Struts HEAD] * For now, Struts HEAD can remain in evolutionary mode, but we will bum

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31034] - use of wildcard in tiles-defs.xml as for wildcard mappings

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31034] New: - use of wildcard in tiles-defs.xml as for wildcard mappings

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27439] - Form definition inheritance support

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu