Re: Important decisions prior to Subversion conversion

2004-09-26 Thread Craig McClanahan
See intermixed. On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 11:48:46 -0700 (PDT), Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There are a couple of things that I think we need to decide on before we > make the final conversion of our repository to Subversion. They fall under > the headings of "what" and "where". > > WHA

Re: why not extend struts to support access control?

2004-09-26 Thread Craig McClanahan
On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 05:07:32 +, liu ji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thank you. > I know filter can do this very well.But filter have some drawbacks.I don't > know how to express this,because of my poor English. > Without struts,I can use a single filter to delegate the request to my > access co

Re: Struts Wiki Etiquette: Niall's Help

2004-09-26 Thread Craig McClanahan
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 11:37:00 -0700, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You should realise that no wiki page is owned by any one person more > than any other, regardless of who creates it. Once created, it is > community owned, and any member of the community is free to add their > changes i

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31371] - html attribute id needed for tags needed

2004-09-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Important decisions prior to Subversion conversion

2004-09-26 Thread Martin Cooper
There are a couple of things that I think we need to decide on before we make the final conversion of our repository to Subversion. They fall under the headings of "what" and "where". WHAT TO CONVERT A default "whole enchilada" conversion of the Struts CVS repo will consume about 1GB of disk sp

Re: why not extend struts to support access control?

2004-09-26 Thread Michael McGrady
Martin Cooper wrote: On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 22:40:18 +0800, liu ji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have just read the example. I don't see any clue that ageci solved the problem. Although it can ensure the security in function level,it isn't very useful. I can security my system in a high level not fu

Re: why not extend struts to support access control?

2004-09-26 Thread Martin Cooper
On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 22:40:18 +0800, liu ji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have just read the example. > I don't see any clue that ageci solved the problem. > > Although it can ensure the security in function level,it isn't very useful. > > I can security my system in a high level not function lev

Re: why not extend struts to support access control?

2004-09-26 Thread Michael McGrady
bryan wrote: http://acegisecurity.sourceforge.net unless of course you feel an irresistable urge to reinvent the wheel for the 10th time .. --b Thanks, again, Bryan. I looked a this the last time you recommended it. The wheel was nothing, by the way. The axel, that was the prob

Re: why not extend struts to support access control?

2004-09-26 Thread liu ji
I don't think I should restructure my appliction. If you use parameter to transfer imformation from page to page,I am sure you will encounter the same situation. In fact,many web sites have to face the problem. == Ji Liu From: bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: why not extend struts to support access control?

2004-09-26 Thread bryan
I think you need to restructure your application. --b On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 22:40:18 +0800, liu ji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have just read the example. > I don't see any clue that ageci solved the problem. > > Although it can ensure the security in function level,it isn't very useful. > >

Re: why not extend struts to support access control?

2004-09-26 Thread liu ji
I have just read the example. I don't see any clue that ageci solved the problem. Although it can ensure the security in function level,it isn't very useful. I can security my system in a high level not function level. It also uses IOC which struts doesn't support.If I want to use it,I have to use

Bug report for Struts [2004/09/26]

2004-09-26 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Re: why not extend struts to support access control?

2004-09-26 Thread Vic Cekvenich
You can allways create a extension or a plugin on sf.net. Declerative security is a part of Java spec, Tomcat, etc, ex: http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs61/webapp/web_xml.html#1017885 .V Michael McGrady wrote: Frank W. Zammetti (MLists) wrote: I'm not sure I follow your reasoning... In terms of securi

Re: why not extend struts to support access control?

2004-09-26 Thread bryan
it does support it, just depends on whether or not you correctly structured your application. Here is a sample app that I wrote to test it. https://jestate.dev.java.net/files/documents/1364/7000/ageci-quick-start.zip There is ample documentation on their web site as well. --b On Sun, 26 Sep 2

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31423] New: - Lazy ActionForms

2004-09-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: why not extend struts to support access control?

2004-09-26 Thread bryan
http://acegisecurity.sourceforge.net unless of course you feel an irresistable urge to reinvent the wheel for the 10th time .. --b On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 05:07:32 +, liu ji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thank you. > I know filter can do this very well.But filter have some drawba