DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31678] - Tiles "put" tag is stuck in application context

2004-10-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31684] New: - html:frame tag anchor attribute does not appear to pass along correctly

2004-10-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Subversion Refactoring Frenzy and Maven Questions

2004-10-12 Thread Martin Cooper
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 06:40:38 -0400, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 21:38:26 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote: > > At this point, I'm not sure we all agree on what would constitute a > > part of v2 rather than v1, since I anticipate some fairly > > substantial changes going in

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31678] New: - Tiles "put" tag is stuck in application context

2004-10-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Roadmap

2004-10-12 Thread Martin Cooper
While I don't disagree with any of Ted's points, I do think that we need to expand our horizons with Struts Next, rather than just provide more of the same. We need to move beyond the traditional web app and embrace the next generation of web apps that have some rather different characteristics. Fo

Re: Roadmap

2004-10-12 Thread Mike Stanley
> The other thing I would add is strong debuggability. Is it true that Tapestry's web > debugging is the best of the current crop of web application frameworks? "Line precise error messages" - are very useful. This however, is not as easy with a JSP engine, given the nature of JSP (template ->

Re: Roadmap

2004-10-12 Thread Peter A. Pilgrim
Ted Husted wrote: To follow up some other threads about the "architectural vision" for Struts Next, I'd like to offer the following: Most of us are torn whether to create Struts Next by evolution or revolution. I think what most of us revolutionaries really want to to create Struts Next by m

Re: Roadmap

2004-10-12 Thread Mike Stanley
On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 11:27, Joe Germuska wrote: > >>Note that, at least with ActionConfigs, there is an important > >>difference between "type" and "className". "className" refers to > >>the type of the ActionConfig itself, should you want to use a > >>subclass (say, for custom properties) wh

Re: Roadmap

2004-10-12 Thread Joe Germuska
Note that, at least with ActionConfigs, there is an important difference between "type" and "className". "className" refers to the type of the ActionConfig itself, should you want to use a subclass (say, for custom properties) while "type" refers to the type of the Action which will be created

Re: open issues

2004-10-12 Thread Ted Husted
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 08:12:56 -0400, Mike Stanley wrote: > I count currently 283 open issues. > > I'm new to this community but am an experienced struts developer - > and senior enterprise Java developer. > > Just a heads up, I'm going to be going (slowly - little here, a > little there) through the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31423] - Lazy ActionForms

2004-10-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: CVS -> SVN

2004-10-12 Thread Ted Husted
If no one beats me to it, I'll update the site and roadmap over this coming weekend, to reflect the many changes we made over the last few weeks. (Way to go Team Struts!) -Ted. On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 23:53:31 -0400, Addy Kapur wrote: > on the Struts main page "CVS Repository" is listed under > "D

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31423] - Lazy ActionForms

2004-10-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: open issues

2004-10-12 Thread Eddie Bush
Mike, You are empowered to make yourself a vote, and karma too. Comments are good, but, if you have a really good idea of how to fix an issue, you're welcome to develop/test a solution and submit a patch :-) That's how users become committers ... Thanks - and best of luck :-) Eddie - Origin

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31299] - Refactor RequestUtils to allow subclassing

2004-10-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

open issues

2004-10-12 Thread Mike Stanley
I count currently 283 open issues. I'm new to this community but am an experienced struts developer - and senior enterprise Java developer. Just a heads up, I'm going to be going (slowly - little here, a little there) through the bug list and commenting on issues. i have no vote, no karma, j

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31255] - say in which scope searched when "No bean found under attribute key" is issued, which tag, which jsp line

2004-10-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Subversion Refactoring Frenzy and Maven Questions

2004-10-12 Thread Ted Husted
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 21:38:26 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote: > At this point, I'm not sure we all agree on what would constitute a > part of v2 rather than v1, since I anticipate some fairly > substantial changes going into what some people have referred to as > v1. I'd certainly not want to see us cre