RE: Commons Chain Cookbook: Why have Struts Actions?

Very nice example and analysis from Peter Pilgrim > -Original Message- > From: Pilgrim, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 17 December 2004 10:59 > To: 'Struts Developers List' > Subject: RE: Commons Chain Cookbook: Why have Struts Actions? > > > > > > -Original Message-

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32760] - validWhen does not handle strings correctly: js error

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32760] New: - validWhen does not handle strings correctly: js error

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Struts chain integration

1) Toss the plugin and rely on ChainListener to load everything. I know this goes back to adding entries in web.xml, at least for 1.2.x. But then ... 2) We can add config for chains in struts-config.xml in the 1.3 code. This doesn't have to be tied to the process of adding support - we could do th

Re: "extends" (was Struts chain integration)

Martin Cooper wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 12:13:21 -0800, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Personally, I favor the approach Cocoon takes to "modules". Cocoon is configured to use one sitemap (config file), but that sitemap can mount or include other sitemaps through the "mount" element. See

Re: "extends" (was Struts chain integration)

On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 12:13:21 -0800, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Personally, I favor the approach Cocoon takes to "modules". Cocoon is > configured to use one sitemap (config file), but that sitemap can mount > or include other sitemaps through the "mount" element. See > http://cocoon.a

Re: Struts chain integration

On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 13:32:16 -0600, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I'm not keen on adding init params in general, and even less keen on > >adding such params that take lists of files. > > > >I do think we need to have a mechanism for specifying global stuff, > >but I think we can come u

"extends" (was Struts chain integration)

Personally, I favor the approach Cocoon takes to "modules". Cocoon is configured to use one sitemap (config file), but that sitemap can mount or include other sitemaps through the "mount" element. See http://cocoon.apache.org/2.1/userdocs/concepts/sitemap.html#Mounting+sitemaps Using wildcard

Re: Struts chain integration

I'm not keen on adding init params in general, and even less keen on adding such params that take lists of files. I do think we need to have a mechanism for specifying global stuff, but I think we can come up with a better way. For example, I don't like that I have to replicate the config in each

Re: Commons Chain Cookbook: Why have Struts Actions?

I would be very interested in this. Jack On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 08:53:32 -0500, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 11:04:05 -0700, BaTien Duong wrote: > > This is great Ted. What it means is that each individual backend > > software component catalog can determine finer g

Re: Struts chain integration

On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 09:09:16 -0600, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 10:29 PM -0800 12/16/04, Don Brown wrote: > >Martin Cooper wrote: > >>On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 21:47:53 -0800, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>>Who is working on bringing Struts chain into Struts core? If no

Re: Subproject web pages

On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 09:47:26 -0800, Don Brown wrote: > Good, what's what I did for BSF Scripting.  Is the website updated > by some cron job, or does a committer have to refresh it? Right now, we refresh it. The simplest thing is to copy the pages over by ssh. Or, if they are in a JAR, you can co

[Fwd: svn commit: r122615 - in struts/bsf: . branches tags trunk trunk/src trunk/src/java trunk/src/java/org trunk/src/java/org/twdata trunk/src/java/org/twdata/struts trunk/src/struts-example trunk/src/struts-example/WEB-INF trunk/src/struts-example/WEB-INF/classes trunk/src/struts-example/WEB-INF/classes/org trunk/src/struts-example/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache trunk/src/struts-example/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/struts trunk/src/struts-example/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/struts/webapp trunk/src/struts-example/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/struts/webapp/example trunk/src/struts-example/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/struts/webapp/example/memory trunk/src/struts-example/WEB-INF/scripts trunk/xdocs]

Author: mrdon Date: Thu Dec 16 21:24:23 2004 New Revision: 122615 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=122615 Log: Adding struts-bsf at version 0.5-dev with adjustments to remove need to store jars in repository Added: struts/bsf/ struts/bsf/.cvsignore struts/bsf/branches/ struts

Re: Subproject web pages

Ted Husted wrote: I would say that new subprojects should start with a standard Maven build. Well, I used Ant for BSF for two reasons: 1) That's what I know, and I wouldn't know how to do the custom example webapp build procedures in Maven 2) Ant is the official build for Core I'm not aga

Re: Struts chain integration

At some point, it would also be nice to extract the taglibs into a separate subproject, since in 1.3.x we agreed that they would not be part of the "core". Ditto for the struts-examples. These are suppose to go into an "apps" subproject. I'd also be in favor of an "extras" subproject, to distri

Re: Subproject web pages

On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 21:43:00 -0800, Don Brown wrote: > The commit message was huge (>100k) so the mail server rejected the > message.  I can forward it to you if you wish. :) When this happens, I'd at least forward the header of the message to dev@, with a , just to give everyone a heads up. -Te

Re: Commons Chain Cookbook: Why have Struts Actions?

On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 11:04:05 -0700, BaTien Duong wrote: > This is great Ted. What it means is that each individual backend > software component catalog can determine finer grain of > authorization and the amount of supplied information. The web layer > will take care of the first pass and assemble

Re: Struts chain integration

At 10:29 PM -0800 12/16/04, Don Brown wrote: Martin Cooper wrote: On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 21:47:53 -0800, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Who is working on bringing Struts chain into Struts core? If no one, I wouldn't mind doing the integration. I haven't made the time to do anything. I was hopi

Re: Subproject web pages

I would say that new subprojects should start with a standard Maven build. Since the next step for 1.3 is creating subprojects for the core, taglibs, and such, I wouldn't worry about integrating it with the Struts build now, since the build is going to change for 1.3. It would just be wasted eff

RE: Commons Chain Cookbook: Why have Struts Actions?

>From my viewpoint, it's important to distinguish between the StrutsContext and >the application's context. Right now, the Commons Chain package implies a different approach, where a WebContext might be passed up to the application layer under the Context interface. In my own work, I like to al

Re: Moving Validator Depenency to Version 1.1.4

Yes, both. Niall - Original Message - From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 5:52 AM Subject: Re: Moving Validator Depenency to Version 1.1.4 > Fine with me. Are you planning to do this for the 1.2 bran

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32748] New: - special characters in mapped property keys are parsed incorrectly

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Commons Chain Cookbook: Why have Struts Actions?

+1 On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 10:58:44 -, Pilgrim, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So I'd agree with this `bigger' all-seeing-context design > in principle. I'd factor out some interfaces for Struts > web environment so that people in theory could re-sig > the implementation. Jack -- "You

RE: Commons Chain Cookbook: Why have Struts Actions?

> -Original Message- > From: BaTien Duong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ==== > > > Ted Husted wrote: > > >On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 17:22:15 +, Pilgrim, Peter wrote: > > > > > >> I was thinking in truth, only providing access to the ``catalog'' > >> and ``command'' not necessarily chan