Re: [struts-faces] JSF integration into Struts

I think, Don, that this "integration" is a bit smoke and mirrors. Really what the integration is, if I understand it right, is just a switch to use either JSF or Struts. They really cannot work together because JSF has a page based controller which is inconsistent with everything Struts as we kno

Re: [struts-faces] JSF integration into Struts

On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 18:04:18 -0800, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Craig McClanahan wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 12:31:19 -0800, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>If that is correct, would it be possible to implement JSF within Struts > >>chain? Could a JSF implementation be de

Re: [struts-faces] JSF integration into Struts

Craig McClanahan wrote: On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 12:31:19 -0800, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If that is correct, would it be possible to implement JSF within Struts chain? Could a JSF implementation be decomposed into chain commands, and therefore allow the user to mix and match? You'd have

Error in Roadmap page

Just noticed that on the Roadmap page (http://struts.apache.org/roadmap.html), the Milestones link is incorrectly pointing to http://struts.apache.org/Milestones.html. This should be (as far as I can gather) http://struts.apache.org/milestones.html (lower case m). Thought I'd let someone know so

Re: [struts-faces] JSF integration into Struts

On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 12:31:19 -0800, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pardon the ignorance, but as I understand it, the struts-faces > integration library allows Struts components to be executed within the > JSF framework. JSF handles the request, then using special adapters, > actions are ex

[struts-faces] JSF integration into Struts

Pardon the ignorance, but as I understand it, the struts-faces integration library allows Struts components to be executed within the JSF framework. JSF handles the request, then using special adapters, actions are executed when desired. If that is correct, would it be possible to implement JS

Re: ViewUtils and UtilityFactory (was Extracting taglibs)

On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 10:58:16 -0800, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 10:54:31 -0800, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What does "Commons FileUpload being Filter-ized" mean? > > Martin has talked (on the Commons dev list) about his plans to upgrade > Commo

Re: ViewUtils and UtilityFactory (was Extracting taglibs)

On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 10:54:31 -0800, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What does "Commons FileUpload being Filter-ized" mean? Martin has talked (on the Commons dev list) about his plans to upgrade Commons FileUpload to use a Servlet Filter, and the request wrapper features of Servlet 2.3, in

Re: ViewUtils and UtilityFactory (was Extracting taglibs)

What does "Commons FileUpload being Filter-ized" mean? Jack On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 08:37:24 -0800, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 23:40:33 -0800, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The problem with putting code like that into a command, is what if > > som

Any comment on the SessionUtils ting I submitted?

Just checking... I know it's the holidays and all, but it's been a couple of days and no one posted any comment (unless I missed it). - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ViewUtils and UtilityFactory (was Extracting taglibs)

On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 23:40:33 -0800, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The problem with putting code like that into a command, is what if > someone wants to replace the populate command, but doesn't want to > re-invent the multipart stuff? I think there is a place for service > functions, cal

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 866] - Clean Way to Add Parameters to Redirecting Forward

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsRelease126

Date: 2004-12-23T06:49:40 Editor: JoeGermuska Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: StrutsRelease126 URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease126 Fix link about signing releases, remove extraneous newlines in two links Change Log: --

svn commit: r123189 - /struts/core/trunk/doc/roadmap.xml

Author: husted Date: Thu Dec 23 04:00:34 2004 New Revision: 123189 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=123189 Log: Refresh website. Modified: struts/core/trunk/doc/roadmap.xml Modified: struts/core/trunk/doc/roadmap.xml Url: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/struts/core/trunk/doc/road

RE: Broken link in struts wiki

I guess it is this one: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SigningReleases Regards, matthias > -Original Message- > From: Matthias Wessendorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2004 8:46 AM > To: dev@struts.apache.org > Subject: Broken link in struts wiki > > > Hi,

Re: ViewUtils and UtilityFactory (was Extracting taglibs)

At 1:17 PM -0800 12/22/04, Don Brown wrote: "coming soon"? Is that an offer? :) uh-oh. Well, to be honest, not very soon, as I'm going to be mostly offline for the next week for the holidays. (I did say "*if*...) I haven't felt like there's a clear consensus on how to move such a thing forwar

svn commit: r123186 - /struts/core/trunk/doc/milestones.xml /struts/core/trunk/doc/project.xml /struts/core/trunk/doc/roadmap.xml

Author: husted Date: Thu Dec 23 03:10:18 2004 New Revision: 123186 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=123186 Log: Add 1.3.x and beyond section to Roadmap, as posted to dev@ list. Update Milestones page to outline proposed enhancements. Modified: struts/core/trunk/doc/milestones.x