[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsGmail

2005-02-18 Thread dev
Date: 2005-02-18T20:02:53 Editor: TimChristopher Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: StrutsGmail URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsGmail no comment Change Log: -- @@ -10,3 +10,5 @@ Looks like I have

Re: Change Action, ActionForm to use ActionContext?

2005-02-18 Thread Ted Husted
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:04:32 -0800, Don Brown wrote: > There is a middle ground which I have been playing with on and off > frequently called "interceptors".  In WebWork2, you can define > action interceptors that intercept certain actions, defined at a > per-action level.  With Struts Action Invoc

Re: Change Action, ActionForm to use ActionContext?

2005-02-18 Thread Ted Husted
The page isn't there any more, but as I remember the example, the Action would be equate to the Listener and the business logic chain would equate to the Finder. As it stands now, the Action could simply populate a Context with whatever attributes a Finder expects. It executes the "Finder" comm

Re: Change Action, ActionForm to use ActionContext?

2005-02-18 Thread Ted Husted
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:04:32 -0800, Don Brown wrote: > You are correct, but in my opinion, these user commands that are > placed in the Struts request processing chain should have relevance > to your entire application and therefore are appropriate in the > global level of the request processing ch

Re: Change Action, ActionForm to use ActionContext?

2005-02-18 Thread Shey Rab Pawo
For what it is worth: -1 To follow Martin Fowler's reasoning (http://www.martinfowler.com/articles/injection.html), a MovieLister wants to use a MovieFinder interface but needs to create a MovieFinderImpl implementation of the MovieFinder interface to do so. We want the MovieLister to be coupled

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33644] - New action forward dispatch action

2005-02-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33644] - New action forward dispatch action

2005-02-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33644] New: - New action forward dispatch action

2005-02-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Change Action, ActionForm to use ActionContext?

2005-02-18 Thread Joe Germuska
At 10:00 AM -0800 2/18/05, Don Brown wrote: I think the WebWork2/XWork implementation of interceptors is pretty spot on. You define interceptors and interceptor stacks at the top of your configuration file. Then, in the action mapping, we'd add an attribute called say "interceptor" which would be

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32014] - HttpServletRequestWrapper in struts-faces broken for servlet 2.4

2005-02-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Change Action, ActionForm to use ActionContext?

2005-02-18 Thread Don Brown
I think the WebWork2/XWork implementation of interceptors is pretty spot on. You define interceptors and interceptor stacks at the top of your configuration file. Then, in the action mapping, we'd add an attribute called say "interceptor" which would be the name of an interceptor stack or interce

Re: Change Action, ActionForm to use ActionContext?

2005-02-18 Thread Joe Germuska
At 9:04 AM -0800 2/18/05, Don Brown wrote: You are correct, but in my opinion, these user commands that are placed in the Struts request processing chain should have relevance to your entire application and therefore are appropriate in the global level of the request processing chain. An action is

Re: Change Action, ActionForm to use ActionContext?

2005-02-18 Thread Don Brown
You are correct, but in my opinion, these user commands that are placed in the Struts request processing chain should have relevance to your entire application and therefore are appropriate in the global level of the request processing chain. An action is about how to process an individual request,

Re: Building Struts

2005-02-18 Thread Joe Germuska
At 7:04 AM -0500 2/18/05, James Mitchell wrote: Ok, what about this: apps bsf struts-build/ site/ build/ core el faces flow sandbox shale site taglib tiles That would allow us to simply copy the nested build/ during the source build of any specific subproject, and still allow the relative refer

svn commit: r154314 - struts/el/trunk/src/share/org/apache/strutsel/taglib/bean/ELIncludeTag.java

2005-02-18 Thread jmitchell
Author: jmitchell Date: Fri Feb 18 07:14:27 2005 New Revision: 154314 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=154314 Log: revert for the sake of confusion Modified: struts/el/trunk/src/share/org/apache/strutsel/taglib/bean/ELIncludeTag.java Modified: struts/el/trunk/src/share/org/ap

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33547] - document that landing on target anchors when coming from struts-config.xml 'forward path="/myAction.do"' declaration inside an action element only works if redirect="true"

2005-02-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Building Struts

2005-02-18 Thread James Mitchell
Ok, what about this: apps bsf struts-build/ site/ build/ core el faces flow sandbox shale site taglib tiles That would allow us to simply copy the nested build/ during the source build of any specific subproject, and still allow the relative references from struts-build/build/ to work (same for

Re: Building Struts

2005-02-18 Thread Ted Husted
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 20:07:14 -0800, Martin Cooper wrote: > struts-core-1.3.0-dev/ >    build/ >    core/ >    config/ >    src/ >    ... > > so introducing a 'core' directory that we would normally not have > in the distro. That's not necessarily a huge big deal, it just > seems a littl

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33630] New: - FormBean support simple type Formats like 'int' and 'long' handled incorrectly

2005-02-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu