DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34297] - extend org.apache.struts.action.ActionForm with a boolean "stringEncodingFromForm" variable informing about the charset of a form field

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34445] - use charsets given by browser for form field encodings

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34445] New: - use charsets given by browser for form field encodings

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r161214 - struts/core/trunk/doc/roadmap.xml

Author: husted Date: Wed Apr 13 14:47:53 2005 New Revision: 161214 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=161214 Log: Minor updates; add OverDrive to list of proposals. Modified: struts/core/trunk/doc/roadmap.xml Modified: struts/core/trunk/doc/roadmap.xml URL: http://svn.apache.or

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34291] - allow to change default string charset encoding to other than ISO-8859

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Making validation javascript more extensible

--- "Frank W. Zammetti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How about rendering the span that you'll place the error message in as > part of what the tag renders? So... > > > > ...renders... > > > > ...then you can simply do as David I think it was suggested in terms of > setting innerHTML (or inn

Re: Making validation javascript more extensible

At 2:48 AM +0100 4/13/05, Niall Pemberton wrote: - Original Message - From: "David Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 2:08 AM --- Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Joe Germuska" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesda

Re: Making validation javascript more extensible

I developed an initial version back in December which can be downloaded here: http://www.niallp.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/validatorjs.html The download includes a webapp which shows both the features and code. Niall - Original Message - From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday

Re: Validation overhaul and integrated form bean config (was: Making validation javascript more extensible)

On 4/12/05, Hubert Rabago <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Over a year ago Niall submitted a patch (which was not accepted) that > would allow validation using format strings used by the Java Format > classes (such as ###,##0.00). If there's going to be an overhaul of > validation, I would like suppor

Re: Making validation javascript more extensible

On 4/12/05, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Its "in-progress" - except I haven't given it any time so far this year :-(. > I am planning to re-visit it, as it has stuff I want to implement. Is the WIP anything you could check into the sandbox, so people could have a looksee? -Ted. -

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34428] New: - Dispatch Action can use a default method to handle unkown request from other screen

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu