Re: Status of "Standalone Tiles Take 2" Effort

2005-07-14 Thread David Geary
Le 05-07-14 à 00:43, Craig McClanahan a écrit : I've followed through on the first steps of my proposed action plan: * Moved the old "sandbox/tiles" to "sandbox/tiles-original" to get it out of the way without losing any information. * Did an "svn copy" from "tiles" to "sandbox/tiles" to for

Re: struts major issue

2005-07-14 Thread Greg Ludington
As a further note, you probably do not want to place your packages under java.* >From the Package naming conventions: "Names of packages intended only for local use should have a first identifier that begins with a lowercase letter, but that first identifier specifically should not be the identif

Re: struts major issue

2005-07-14 Thread netsql
Consider unit testing form beans. Also move the thread to struts user list. .V Shai Topaz wrote: Hi all, Please help. I am not new to struts but I cannot resolve this issue: Platform: winXP, Tomcat 5.0.28, Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.2_08-b03), struts packa

RE: struts major issue

2005-07-14 Thread Shai Topaz
Thanks for the prompt reply, attached is the login.jsp, calling the action, and LoginForm.java and it's parent class AbstractForm... Kind regards -Original Message- From: Vinay L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 11:19 AM To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: stru

Re: struts major issue

2005-07-14 Thread Vinay L
There might be a missing field in Input.jsp file or Form bean Class. Can you send JSP file calling this action and LoginFom.java File On 7/14/05, Shai Topaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Please help. I am not new to struts but I cannot resolve this issue: > > Platform: winXP, Tomcat 5

struts major issue

2005-07-14 Thread Shai Topaz
Hi all, Please help. I am not new to struts but I cannot resolve this issue: Platform: winXP, Tomcat 5.0.28, Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.2_08-b03), struts package 1.2.4 Stacktrace: SEVERE: Error creating form bean of class java.annualdisclosure.core.form.LoginF

Re: Stateful Pages (was Re: Putting execute() in ActionForm)

2005-07-14 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 7/14/05, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You mean, to have analog of _viewstate in ASP.NET? I know that JSF > supports it too, but in JSF state is saved on server by default, which > is a relief. JSF backing beans have "session" scope by default, no > hidden fields are used. Th

Re: Stateful Pages (was Re: Putting execute() in ActionForm)

2005-07-14 Thread Michael Jouravlev
On 7/14/05, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * It is impossible to get read of POSTDATA situation Typo, must rid: "to get rid". - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO

Re: Stateful Pages (was Re: Putting execute() in ActionForm)

2005-07-14 Thread Michael Jouravlev
On 7/14/05, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > <> > > On 7/13/05, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 7/13/05, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Most importantly, I'd make very sure that all my "code-behind > > > ActionForms" were request scope, probably by changing

[Struts Wiki] Update of "Comparison using nested tag vs JSTL for nested objects on form" by RickReumann

2005-07-14 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by RickReumann: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/Comparison_using_nested_tag_vs_JSTL_for_nested_objects_on_form New page: === Comparison using nested ta

[Struts Wiki] Update of "StrutsSolutions" by RickReumann

2005-07-14 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by RickReumann: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsSolutions -- 5.

[Struts Wiki] Update of "StrutsSolutions" by RickReumann

2005-07-14 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by RickReumann: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsSolutions -- 5.

[Struts Wiki] Update of "StrutsSolutions" by RickReumann

2005-07-14 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by RickReumann: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsSolutions -- Thi

[Struts Wiki] Update of "StrutsCatalogLazyList" by RickReumann

2005-07-14 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by RickReumann: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsCatalogLazyList --

Re: Struts Dialogs (was HTTP method for action-mappings)

2005-07-14 Thread Michael Jouravlev
On 7/14/05, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/5/05, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I really want people to understand what is that I am actually > > advertising ;-), so questions are welcome. > > Have you done a version of the infamous Struts MailReader using Struts >

Re: Initial checkin of standalone Tiles

2005-07-14 Thread Levieux Cedric
Sounds fine for me. Cedric - Original Message - From: "James Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers List" Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 6:06 AM Subject: Re: Initial checkin of standalone Tiles > That sounds great. Given the commit activity as of late, I doubt > there

Re: Struts Dialogs (was HTTP method for action-mappings)

2005-07-14 Thread Ted Husted
On 7/5/05, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I really want people to understand what is that I am actually > advertising ;-), so questions are welcome. Have you done a version of the infamous Struts MailReader using Struts Dialog yet? Many of us are already familiar with the MailRead

Stateful Pages (was Re: Putting execute() in ActionForm)

2005-07-14 Thread Ted Husted
<> On 7/13/05, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/13/05, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Most importantly, I'd make very sure that all my "code-behind > > ActionForms" were request scope, probably by changing the factory > > default. > > In this case this form would not