svn commit: r278929 - in /struts/site/trunk/xdocs: index.xml volunteers.xml

Author: husted Date: Mon Sep 5 23:56:51 2005 New Revision: 278929 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=278929&view=rev Log: * On index, Stylist change. * On volunteers, move Hubert up to match initiation order. Modified: struts/site/trunk/xdocs/index.xml struts/site/trunk/xdocs/volu

svn commit: r278917 - in /struts/shale/trunk: ./ clay-plugin/ clay-plugin/xdocs/ core-library/ core-library/xdocs/ test-framework/xdocs/ use-cases/xdocs/ xdocs/

Author: wsmoak Date: Mon Sep 5 22:34:24 2005 New Revision: 278917 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=278917&view=rev Log: Updated navigation and logos for Shale website Added: struts/shale/trunk/clay-plugin/xdocs/ struts/shale/trunk/clay-plugin/xdocs/navigation.xml struts/shale/t

Re: Struts Ti / JSF sample

This means that if you're running 1.4 you can still do a build from the root? Nice! :) James Mitchell wrote: Sounds good to me. I have a plan for how I'll instrument the build to be 1.4/1.5 aware and behave accordingly. I just haven't put it down in bits yet ;) I hope to get to that s

Re: Struts Ti / JSF sample

Sounds good to me. I have a plan for how I'll instrument the build to be 1.4/1.5 aware and behave accordingly. I just haven't put it down in bits yet ;) I hope to get to that soon though since it seems to be holding up some of the other tasks I'm on. Thanks -- James Mitchell Software

[Struts Wiki] Update of "StrutsTi/JspTags" by EddieONeil

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by EddieONeil: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsTi/JspTags The comment on the change is: Add some info about the NetUI JSP tags -

Re: Website Updates

On 9/5/05, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ted: > > I hear what you're saying, but I think that "struts-core" is the most > accurate label for the things included in that artifact. > Conceptually, it is "Struts 1.x core", but that's too verbose. > > I'm for sticking with "core". I'

Re: Website Updates

From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I really must commend Wendy and James for the excellent work on the new Struts build. It's working well, and I'm having fun with it. :) Thanks for taking on the rewrites and the final reorganization... it's been fun seeing it all come together this weeke

[Struts Wiki] Update of "StrutsWebsiteConversion" by WendySmoak

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by WendySmoak: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsWebsiteConversion --

Re: Website Updates

From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Where do we stand on moving the rest of the nightly builds to Maven? Can we assume that Shale, Struts Faces, and Standalone Tiles (currently in the Sandbox) will all be built by Maven, and remove the dichotomy on the Acquiring page? Standalone Tiles has

svn commit: r278892 - in /struts/site/trunk/xdocs: acquiring.xml announce.xml bylaws.xml download.xml helping.xml index.xml javadoc.xml mail.xml navigation.xml release-checklist.xml releases.xml using

Author: husted Date: Mon Sep 5 17:14:15 2005 New Revision: 278892 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=278892&view=rev Log: Interim changes to Site subproject. Modified: struts/site/trunk/xdocs/acquiring.xml struts/site/trunk/xdocs/announce.xml struts/site/trunk/xdocs/bylaws.xml

svn commit: r278890 - in /struts: core/trunk/xdocs/learning.xml site/trunk/xdocs/learning.xml

Author: husted Date: Mon Sep 5 17:00:37 2005 New Revision: 278890 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=278890&view=rev Log: Move Learning page to Core Added: struts/core/trunk/xdocs/learning.xml - copied unchanged from r278889, struts/site/trunk/xdocs/learning.xml Removed: struts

svn commit: r278887 - in /struts: bsf/trunk/xdocs/navigation.xml faces/trunk/xdocs/index.xml faces/trunk/xdocs/navigation.xml site/trunk/xdocs/navigation.xml

Author: wsmoak Date: Mon Sep 5 16:49:15 2005 New Revision: 278887 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=278887&view=rev Log: Updated navigation for Faces and BSF. Added description from project.xml to Faces index.xml. Modified: struts/bsf/trunk/xdocs/navigation.xml struts/faces/trunk/

Re: Website Updates

Ted: I hear what you're saying, but I think that "struts-core" is the most accurate label for the things included in that artifact. Conceptually, it is "Struts 1.x core", but that's too verbose. I'm for sticking with "core". Joe The moniker "Core" did make a lot of sense when we were thin

Re: Website Updates

From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> And, we do have to call it something. We're having great success with Maven, and Maven expects artifacts to have names. The closest we could come to a no-name artifact would be struts-struts-1.3.0 -- which is too odd, even for me :) Maven doesn't care wha

svn commit: r278871 - in /struts: faces/trunk/xdocs/ site/trunk/xdocs/faces/

Author: wsmoak Date: Mon Sep 5 15:28:14 2005 New Revision: 278871 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=278871&view=rev Log: Moved Struts Faces docs to sub-project Added: struts/faces/trunk/xdocs/ - copied from r278870, struts/site/trunk/xdocs/faces/ Removed: struts/site/trunk/xdo

Re: Website Updates

Ted Husted wrote: The moniker "Core" did make a lot of sense when we were thinking that the other Struts subprojects would depend on Core. But, we dismissed that idea when we decided to host Shale. Now, should we decide to host Struts Ti one day, we would have two Java subprojects not dependant o

svn commit: r278868 - /struts/faces/trunk/xdocs/

Author: wsmoak Date: Mon Sep 5 15:25:57 2005 New Revision: 278868 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=278868&view=rev Log: Deleting xdocs to allow moving site/xdocs/faces into its place. Removed: struts/faces/trunk/xdocs/ -

Re: Website Updates

On 9/5/05, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I agree, config is a little too left-field (even though it does make > sense as Ted describes). > > I'm not actually too thrilled with even saying "core" frankly... I would > be more in favor of simply calling core "Struts" and all the > su

Re: Website Updates

Where do we stand on moving the rest of the nightly builds to Maven? Can we assume that Shale, Struts Faces, and Standalone Tiles (currently in the Sandbox) will all be built by Maven, and remove the dichotomy on the Acquiring page? -T. --

Re: Website Updates

I agree, config is a little too left-field (even though it does make sense as Ted describes). I'm not actually too thrilled with even saying "core" frankly... I would be more in favor of simply calling core "Struts" and all the sub-projects "Struts-xxx". I understand the reasoning of adding c

Re: Struts Ti / JSF sample

Sorry for the delay on this thread... just catching up now. Currently the minimum in the non-Java5 code is 1.4, although we never discussed it. I think supporting 1.3 would be really hard, but it's something we should establish. Currently, the 'samples' .war is Java5 (annotation)-based, but

svn commit: r278852 - /struts/site/trunk/xdocs/bsf/

Author: wsmoak Date: Mon Sep 5 14:22:33 2005 New Revision: 278852 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=278852&view=rev Log: Removed site/xdocs/bsf directory, docs were moved to BSF sub-project. Removed: struts/site/trunk/xdocs/bsf/

Re: Website Updates

You are right, that seems odd. I really like 'core' since it seems (to me anyway) to encapsulate the 'core' of the framework, but I'm not married to it, and I know how (sometimes) being too close to something makes it harder to see the 'forrest' ;) Your thoughts? -- James Mitchell Softw

svn commit: r278848 - in /struts: bsf/trunk/xdocs/navigation.xml site/trunk/xdocs/bsf/navigation.xml

Author: wsmoak Date: Mon Sep 5 14:20:20 2005 New Revision: 278848 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=278848&view=rev Log: Moved BSF docs to sub-project Added: struts/bsf/trunk/xdocs/navigation.xml - copied unchanged from r278847, struts/site/trunk/xdocs/bsf/navigation.xml Removed:

svn commit: r278847 - /struts/bsf/trunk/xdocs/navigation.xml

Author: wsmoak Date: Mon Sep 5 14:19:04 2005 New Revision: 278847 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=278847&view=rev Log: Removed navigation.xml to make room for site/xdocs/bsf/navigation.xml with history Removed: struts/bsf/trunk/xdocs/navigation.xml -

svn commit: r278845 - in /struts: bsf/trunk/xdocs/index.xml site/trunk/xdocs/bsf/index.xml

Author: wsmoak Date: Mon Sep 5 14:14:53 2005 New Revision: 278845 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=278845&view=rev Log: Moved BSF docs to sub-project Added: struts/bsf/trunk/xdocs/index.xml - copied unchanged from r278844, struts/site/trunk/xdocs/bsf/index.xml Removed: struts

Re: Website Updates

Here's an odd idea: What if we called Struts "Core", Struts "Config" instead? After all, the purpose of the codebase is to realize the struts-config XML file. What goes into Struts "Core" might be ambiguous, but what goes inot Struts Config is defined, by, well, the struts-config XML declaration.

Re: Website Updates

Hey that look great! (I only wish I had more time to help) Keep up the good work! -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist Consulting / Mentoring / Freelance EdgeTech, Inc. http://www.edgetechservices.net/ 678.910.8017 AIM: jmitchtx Yahoo: jmitchtx MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Website Updates

In between coping with a crashed server on my local network, I've started to make the "final" round of changes on the new website. I'll be committing these as I go along, but I thought it appropriate to post the reworked text for the Site and Core homepages directly to the list. We had talked abou

svn commit: r278795 - in /struts: core/trunk/xdocs/milestones.xml site/trunk/xdocs/milestones.xml

Author: husted Date: Mon Sep 5 09:36:48 2005 New Revision: 278795 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=278795&view=rev Log: Move Milestones to Core Added: struts/core/trunk/xdocs/milestones.xml - copied unchanged from r278794, struts/site/trunk/xdocs/milestones.xml Removed: strut

svn commit: r278794 - in /struts: core/trunk/xdocs/roadmap.xml site/trunk/xdocs/roadmap.xml

Author: husted Date: Mon Sep 5 09:36:11 2005 New Revision: 278794 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=278794&view=rev Log: Move RoadMap to Core Added: struts/core/trunk/xdocs/roadmap.xml - copied unchanged from r278793, struts/site/trunk/xdocs/roadmap.xml Removed: struts/site/tr

svn commit: r278792 - in /struts: core/trunk/xdocs/faqs/helping.xml site/trunk/xdocs/helping.xml

Author: husted Date: Mon Sep 5 09:33:17 2005 New Revision: 278792 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=278792&view=rev Log: Move How to Help FAQ back to site, since it applies to project Added: struts/site/trunk/xdocs/helping.xml - copied unchanged from r278791, struts/core/trunk/xdo

svn commit: r278790 - in /struts: core/trunk/xdocs/faqs/ site/trunk/xdocs/faqs/

Author: husted Date: Mon Sep 5 09:28:31 2005 New Revision: 278790 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=278790&view=rev Log: Move UserGuide from site to core Added: struts/core/trunk/xdocs/faqs/ - copied from r278789, struts/site/trunk/xdocs/faqs/ Removed: struts/site/trunk/xdocs/

svn commit: r278788 - in /struts: core/trunk/xdocs/userGuide/ site/trunk/xdocs/userGuide/

Author: husted Date: Mon Sep 5 09:24:15 2005 New Revision: 278788 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=278788&view=rev Log: Move UserGuide from site to core Added: struts/core/trunk/xdocs/userGuide/ - copied from r278787, struts/site/trunk/xdocs/userGuide/ Removed: struts/site/tr

svn commit: r278783 - /struts/core/trunk/xdocs/index.xml

Author: husted Date: Mon Sep 5 08:56:45 2005 New Revision: 278783 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=278783&view=rev Log: Copied remotely for editing. Added: struts/core/trunk/xdocs/index.xml - copied unchanged from r278782, struts/site/trunk/xdocs/index.xml -

[Struts Wiki] Update of "StrutsWebsiteConversion" by TedHusted

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by TedHusted: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsWebsiteConversion The comment on the change is: Add bullets for Core, Taglibs subproject docs. --

svn commit: r278776 - /struts/shale/trunk/clay-plugin/src/conf/shale-clay.tld

Author: gvanmatre Date: Mon Sep 5 08:22:12 2005 New Revision: 278776 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=278776&view=rev Log: Added "rendered" attribute to the Clay tag. Modified: struts/shale/trunk/clay-plugin/src/conf/shale-clay.tld Modified: struts/shale/trunk/clay-plugin/src/conf/sha

Re: Struts Ti / JSF sample

I'm documenting the build process and I thought I'd take a stab at figuring out how to have our build conditionally ignore anything that requires 1.5 if they are using 1.4 or less. What is the minimum? I've just been assuming 1.4. Everything (.WARs) in Ti require 1.5. Is that supposed to b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36496] - Dynaform values assigned to empty string

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36496] New: - Dynaform values assigned to empty string

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu