Re: Nightly builds - Status

Ok, that's what I needed. I'll see if I can pull it all together. Thanks -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist Consulting / Mentoring / Freelance EdgeTech, Inc. http://www.edgetechservices.net/ 678.910.8017 AIM: jmitchtx Yahoo: jmitchtx MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype:

Proposed DynaActionForm enhancement

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36794 I just posted the above enhancement request (with a patch to implement it, of course ;-). This adds an external dependency on CGLIB; I don't know if that will fly, but personally I think the benefits are worth it. Read on to see if you ag

Re: Nightly builds - Status

From: "James Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> BTW -- Can you tell me (wiki, mail-archive, etc) where to get the latest instructions to build the web site and documentation and how we want it laid out? I'm getting ready to add that task to the nightly build and I don't want to do it wrong. I

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36794] - Enhance DynaActionForm and sub-classes to allow normal property access in JSPs

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36794] - Enhance DynaActionForm and sub-classes to allow normal property access in JSPs

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36794] - Enhance DynaActionForm and sub-classes to allow normal property access in JSPs

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36794] - Enhance DynaActionForm and sub-classes to allow normal property access in JSPs

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36794] New: - Enhance DynaActionForm and sub-classes to allow normal property access in JSPs

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r291241 - in /struts/site/trunk: project.properties xdocs/javadoc.xml

Author: wsmoak Date: Fri Sep 23 20:54:05 2005 New Revision: 291241 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=291241&view=rev Log: Changed build to include Shale's site after moving its build files, and link to the generated Javadoc. Modified: struts/site/trunk/project.properties struts/site

svn commit: r291239 - in /struts/site/trunk: project.properties project.xml xdocs/javadoc.xml

Author: wsmoak Date: Fri Sep 23 20:02:33 2005 New Revision: 291239 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=291239&view=rev Log: Added missing svn props, fixed line endings Modified: struts/site/trunk/project.properties (contents, props changed) struts/site/trunk/project.xml (props chan

Re: ThreadLocal ActionContext and thread model of requestDispatcher.forward

On 9/23/05, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I was experimenting with a local subclass of ActionContext which > added itself to a ThreadLocal in the constructor, so that I could in > theory get access to the ActionContext from classes which don't get > it passed in. (I wanted to use it i

Re: Nightly builds - Status

Yes, that's possible, but not likely to be needed, since it is just extra overhead to generate something that will never change. BTW -- Can you tell me (wiki, mail-archive, etc) where to get the latest instructions to build the web site and documentation and how we want it laid out? I'm ge

ThreadLocal ActionContext and thread model of requestDispatcher.forward

I was experimenting with a local subclass of ActionContext which added itself to a ThreadLocal in the constructor, so that I could in theory get access to the ActionContext from classes which don't get it passed in. (I wanted to use it in a TilesController, for example, or maybe in a JSTL func

Re: Nightly builds - Status

From: "James Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I think now would be a good time to discuss the Struts website. I know Wendy and Ted have been making a lot of changes and I honestly haven't been keeping up with it all. I think we've already decided to do everything you mentioned-- go back to p

Re: [shale] Unexpected behavior with TilesViewHandler and ConverterException

I believe this is a bug with MyFaces (http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-611). sean On 9/22/05, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've just run into a strange issue with Tiles and JSF Converters. My > converter was cataching a NPE while converting and rethrew as a > Converter

Re: Thread-unsafe Command classes

I've recently been designing applications so that per-action-path commands are retrieved from Spring rather than from the default commons-chain CatalogFactory. This then makes the lifecycle of the command an external property (based on the "singleton" attribute of a element in a Spring beans

Thread-unsafe Command classes

Hi there, I keep telling people that 1.3 allows out of the box to execute ANY ARBITRARY CLASS via command=, catalog= and chain-config, as long as it implements the command interface. If those classes have to be tread-safe, like old actions had to be, that is not entirely true. Any idea how t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36777] New: - validation is not working with struts1.2

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu