Re: svn commit: r349871 - /struts/shale/trunk/docs/release-notes-1.0.0.html

On 11/29/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Author: craigmcc > Date: Tue Nov 29 19:40:19 2005 > New Revision: 349871 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=349871&view=rev > Log: > Take note of an outstanding serializability issue (37707), plus clean up > some cosmetic details.

Re: [shale][clay] Serializability (was Re: [shale] Import statements)

On 11/29/05, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/29/05, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > In general, here's the policy that I propose to follow w.r.t. serialization: > > * Any class for which an instance might get stored (by the framework, > or by the application wit

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT][shale] Struts Shale 1.0.0 Release Candidate 1 Available

On 11/28/05, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/28/05, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > A few questions. For these interim builds that don't get released > > officially. I assume these builds aren't in the apache archive or > > Maven repository right? You just make t

[PROPOSAL] Target tickets to milestones and use as roadmap

I propose we use an automated, easy to understand roadmap that relies on Bugzilla tickets marked against Milestones. With all the action in the Struts project lately, it is hard to see what is going on where, and specifically, qualitatively how much work remains before a Milestone will be reac

svn commit: r349894 - /struts/build/trunk/KEYS

Author: craigmcc Date: Tue Nov 29 22:29:09 2005 New Revision: 349894 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=349894&view=rev Log: Add my key as well. Modified: struts/build/trunk/KEYS Modified: struts/build/trunk/KEYS URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/struts/build/trunk/KEYS?rev=349894&r1=3

[Struts Wiki] Update of "ShaleCoreLibrary" by WendySmoak

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by WendySmoak: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/ShaleCoreLibrary The comment on the change is: Added an example of s:token, I don't see it mentioned in

[Struts Wiki] Update of "ShaleTestFramework" by WendySmoak

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by WendySmoak: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/ShaleTestFramework New page: == Tips == * Remember to call super.setUp() and super.tearDown() in your

[Struts Wiki] Update of "StrutsShale" by WendySmoak

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by WendySmoak: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsShale -- * [htt

Re: Clarifications on JSF Vs Struts-Shale

On 11/29/05, Kade Jeevan Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi! > > while i was going through Struts Shale framework. > > I came up with few questions. > > We can go for directly to JSF instead of Struts-JSF using Struts-Shale > framework it seems this approach is round around. > > By the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20535] - Dynamically size arrays to allow array types in request scope DynaActionForm forms

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Clarifications on JSF Vs Struts-Shale

Hi! while i was going through Struts Shale framework. I came up with few questions. We can go for directly to JSF instead of Struts-JSF using Struts-Shale framework it seems this approach is round around. By the way JSF is also a kind of framwork similar to Struts 1.x. Why

Re: Clarification on Shale Framewok

I'd suggest you start by reading the documentation - there's quite a bit of it - and come back (to the User list, not the Dev list) if you still have questions after that. See: http://struts.apache.org/struts-shale/index.html -- Martin Cooper On 11/29/05, Kade Jeevan Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

Re: Clarification on Shale Framewok

On 11/29/05, Kade Jeevan Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi! > > I worked on Struts 1.1 and also on 1.2. I came across Shale framework > which is look like the JSF. > > Correct me if am wrong and also kindly help me out to know more abt > Shale framework. Your best bet for more informat

Re: [VOTE] Confirm the Struts Action Library 1.3.0 release plan

Niall Pemberton wrote: On 11/29/05, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/29/05, Laurie Harper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Niall Pemberton wrote: Also looked like the property types were the wrong way round for indexed methods, so I also switched them. Hmm, with that change, accessi

Clarification on Shale Framewok

Hi! I worked on Struts 1.1 and also on 1.2. I came across Shale framework which is look like the JSF. Correct me if am wrong and also kindly help me out to know more abt Shale framework. I have few questions . 1) How it is related to Struts framework 2) How it works 3

Re: [shale][clay] Serializability (was Re: [shale] Import statements)

On 11/29/05, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * CommonsValidator > > This is a JSF Validator, so it could well be attached to a UIComponent > stored in session scope. It's not obvious from a static review of the code > what's the problem, but if there is one it'll need to be fixed. I

svn commit: r349871 - /struts/shale/trunk/docs/release-notes-1.0.0.html

Author: craigmcc Date: Tue Nov 29 19:40:19 2005 New Revision: 349871 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=349871&view=rev Log: Take note of an outstanding serializability issue (37707), plus clean up some cosmetic details. Modified: struts/shale/trunk/docs/release-notes-1.0.0.html Modified

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37707] - [shale] Implement serializability on classes potentially stored in session scope

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37707] New: - [shale] Implement serializability on classes potentially stored in session scope

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [shale][clay] Serializability (was Re: [shale] Import statements)

On 11/29/05, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11/15/05, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11/14/05, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > The other major item its complaining about is non-transient > > > non-serializable fields in Serializable class

[shale][clay] Serializability (was Re: [shale] Import statements)

On 11/15/05, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/14/05, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > The other major item its complaining about is non-transient > > non-serializable fields in Serializable classes. That explains some of > > the NotSerializableException's I get w

Re: Tough Questions on Struts and Webwork Integration

Ted, I've started to bring some of the merger stuff over to the Struts Ti wiki. Could I migrate the FAQ as well, or were you wanting to keep it where it is? Don Ted Husted wrote: On 11/29/05, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Of course, as I send this, I see Patrick responded saying the

Re: Tough Questions on Struts and Webwork Integration

Actually, Contegix does fully-managed hosting and we might even wish to use some of the services (wiki, jira, etc) for Struts Ti development. Contegix is _excellent_ and do everything from handling upgrades, to 24 hour monitoring and support. Atlassian has donated JIRA and Confluence licenses, howe

[Struts Wiki] Trivial Update of "StrutsTi" by DonBrown

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by DonBrown: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsTi -- '''Struts Ti

[Struts Wiki] Trivial Update of "StrutsTi" by DonBrown

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by DonBrown: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsTi -- * [http://blogs

[Struts Wiki] Trivial Update of "StrutsTi" by DonBrown

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by DonBrown: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsTi The comment on the change is: Cleaned up webwork links -

[Struts Wiki] Update of "StrutsTi" by DonBrown

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by DonBrown: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsTi The comment on the change is: Adding new Struts Ti information -

Re: Tough Questions on Struts and Webwork Integration

Niall Pemberton wrote: I'm probably going to say something stupid and show my ignorance of WebWork now, but number one on my list would be CoR and integrating Commons Chain commands - both as a replacement for the Struts Action and as a way of inserting custom "request processing" behaviour. I un

Re: Tough Questions on Struts and Webwork Integration

On 11/29/05, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Of course, as I send this, I see Patrick responded saying the same thing but > much better :) See also * http://opensource2.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/STRUTS2/WebWork+Merger+FAQ -Ted. ---

Re: Tough Questions on Struts and Webwork Integration

On 11/29/05, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Niall Pemberton wrote: > > Its probably a great plan to switch to WebWork 2.2 but I still don't > > see how you can say its a "merger" if no Struts code is involved - > > merger in terms of community, but not software. > > I view this merger as fi

Merger - A suggestion for a next step

Rather than cross post to both dev lists, I posted to the QuickTopic thread * http://www.quicktopic.com/33/H/KBfrHFUehSj -Ted. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Tough Questions on Struts and Webwork Integration

On 11/29/05, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11/29/05, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Let's reserve Tuesday night, after the two Struts related sessions, > to > > have > > > > these conversations. > > > > Sounds good. Perhaps we should discuss over beer? >

Re: Tough Questions on Struts and Webwork Integration

On 11/29/05, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Let's reserve Tuesday night, after the two Struts related sessions, to > have > > > these conversations. > > Sounds good. Perhaps we should discuss over beer? Beer is good :-). Indeed, the only bummer about ApacheCon this year is t

Re: Tough Questions on Struts and Webwork Integration

Don Brown wrote: Craig McClanahan wrote: On 11/29/05, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Actually, I'd love for Shale and Struts Ti to collaborate more, and in a perfect world, both depend on the same core. Struts Ti won't be JSF-specific (ever), but that doesn't mean it can't integrate wi

Re: Tough Questions on Struts and Webwork Integration

> > Let's reserve Tuesday night, after the two Struts related sessions, to have > > these conversations. Sounds good. Perhaps we should discuss over beer? > Don sean - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional c

Re: Tough Questions on Struts and Webwork Integration

Craig McClanahan wrote: On 11/29/05, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Actually, I'd love for Shale and Struts Ti to collaborate more, and in a perfect world, both depend on the same core. Struts Ti won't be JSF-specific (ever), but that doesn't mean it can't integrate with JSF. I'm lookin

Re: Tough Questions on Struts and Webwork Integration

On 11/29/05, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Actually, I'd love for Shale and Struts Ti to collaborate more, and in a > perfect world, both depend on the same core. Struts Ti won't be > JSF-specific (ever), but that doesn't mean it can't integrate with JSF. > I'm looking forward to Apac

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project struts-action (in module struts) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project struts-action has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affect

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project struts-action (in module struts) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project struts-action has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affect

Re: Tough Questions on Struts and Webwork Integration

Michael Jouravlev wrote: On 11/29/05, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Niall Pemberton wrote: Its probably a great plan to switch to WebWork 2.2 but I still don't see how you can say its a "merger" if no Struts code is involved - merger in terms of community, but not software. I view th

Re: Tough Questions on Struts and Webwork Integration

Great. I don't think it requires JSF. It also works w/ Ajax and has Ajax modules (and that has little to do w/ JSF afiak). Sounds like a simple resolution: Shale can be JSF centric but not require it so it works w/ other (rich, client side) views. We we lived happily ever after. .V Don Brown w

Re: Tough Questions on Struts and Webwork Integration

> ...and learn Webwork *then* after all. Why not to simply say "Struts > sucks, let's drop it and march together into the better future under > OpenSymphony standard?" Why the need of keeping *this* community > *here* instead of moving/creating community *there* ? First time poster :) I would say

Re: Tough Questions on Struts and Webwork Integration

On 11/29/05, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Niall Pemberton wrote: > > Its probably a great plan to switch to WebWork 2.2 but I still don't > > see how you can say its a "merger" if no Struts code is involved - > > merger in terms of community, but not software. > I view this merger as firs

Re: Tough Questions on Struts and Webwork Integration

The sticking point is Shale requires JSF, and Struts Ti does not want that dependency. My hope is we will be able to find code in both projects that could be shared, somehow. Don netsql wrote: The features that are in Ti and WebWork, can they be bolted on Shale? .V Don Brown wrote: Actual

Re: Tough Questions on Struts and Webwork Integration

The features that are in Ti and WebWork, can they be bolted on Shale? .V Don Brown wrote: Actually, I'd love for Shale and Struts Ti to collaborate more, and in a perfect world, both depend on the same core. Struts Ti won't be JSF-specific (ever), but that doesn't mean it can't integrate with

Re: Tough Questions on Struts and Webwork Integration

Pilgrim, Peter wrote: Ok great so is Ted Husted also involved in the 2nd edition and I presume Manning is fine with both Struts in Action and Webwork in Action in the future ``merging'' as one. Ted has helped early on by reviewing our proposal and TOC, but the book is being written by Nick H

RE: Tough Questions on Struts and Webwork Integration

> -Original Message- > From: Don Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 29 November 2005 16:27 > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: Re: Tough Questions on Struts and Webwork Integration > > > These are some great questions, and particularly relevant to > me as I'm > working on the

Re: Tough Questions on Struts and Webwork Integration

On 11/29/05, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/29/05, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > First, we bring in the WebWork 2.2 code which forms the Struts Ti core. > > Then, we develop a Struts compatibility layer. Along the way, if we > > see anything from Struts Action 1.x t

Re: Tough Questions on Struts and Webwork Integration

Niall Pemberton wrote: On 11/29/05, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: First, we bring in the WebWork 2.2 code which forms the Struts Ti core. Then, we develop a Struts compatibility layer. Along the way, if we see anything from Struts Action 1.x that should also go into Struts Ti core, we

Re: Tough Questions on Struts and Webwork Integration

On 11/29/05, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > First, we bring in the WebWork 2.2 code which forms the Struts Ti core. > Then, we develop a Struts compatibility layer. Along the way, if we > see anything from Struts Action 1.x that should also go into Struts Ti > core, we can add it. Honest

Re: Tough Questions on Struts and Webwork Integration

Actually, I'd love for Shale and Struts Ti to collaborate more, and in a perfect world, both depend on the same core. Struts Ti won't be JSF-specific (ever), but that doesn't mean it can't integrate with JSF. I'm looking forward to ApacheCon so we can sit down with Craig and look at ways we c

Re: Tough Questions on Struts and Webwork Integration

First, we bring in the WebWork 2.2 code which forms the Struts Ti core. Then, we develop a Struts compatibility layer. Along the way, if we see anything from Struts Action 1.x that should also go into Struts Ti core, we can add it. Honestly, I don't really see anything of Struts Action 1.x t

Re: Tough Questions on Struts and Webwork Integration

idealy ... it be great to bolt on webwork and ti features on top of Shale code base, or at worst fork Shale as a starting point. there I said it! .V - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Tough Questions on Struts and Webwork Integration

On 11/29/05, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 3) A users has invested his or her hard-earned cash in `WebWork' in Action > > book. > > Will contents of this tome still be relevant in Struts? > > Absolutely, since Struts Ti == WebWork 2.2, with some package name changes. > > > 5) What a

Re: Tough Questions on Struts and Webwork Integration

These are some great questions, and particularly relevant to me as I'm working on the 2ed edition of Struts in Action. You can be sure our book will cover, at least in part, Struts Ti. Here is my 2c: Pilgrim, Peter wrote: Hi 1) Is the WebWork name going to exist still? No, at least not in

RE: Tough Questions on Struts and Webwork Integration

> -Original Message- > From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ==== > > I have a few thoughts on this and I will try to avoid the "Which > framework is better?" discussion. > > Change is inevitable. Struts (as you know and use it today) will > eventually become obsolete. Nob

Re: [VOTE] Confirm the Struts Action Library 1.3.0 release plan

On 11/29/05, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/29/05, Laurie Harper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Niall Pemberton wrote: > > > Also looked like the property types were the wrong way round for > > > indexed methods, so I also switched them. > > > > Hmm, with that change, accessing

RE: Tough Questions on Struts and Webwork Integration

> -Original Message- > From: Joe Germuska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ==== > > > By no means do I consider myself the authority to answer these, but > here are some responses based on my understanding and my interest in > how things go. In summary, really a lot of these questions ar

Re: display wrong german chars

Hello Michele, guess you need to read about this html tags: Here is useful link: * http://de.selfhtml.org/html/kopfdaten/meta.htm#zeichenkodierung It's in german. I think you should post these kind of questions in the struts-user list. This is a list for developing struts itself. Cheers, Ch

Re: Tough Questions on Struts and Webwork Integration

I have a few thoughts on this and I will try to avoid the "Which framework is better?" discussion. Change is inevitable. Struts (as you know and use it today) will eventually become obsolete. Nobody can say when the last meaningful Struts 1.x application will be written but that day will eventua

Re: Tough Questions on Struts and Webwork Integration

Hi Peter, I guess bringing together the masterminds of multiple web frameworks is a good idea, even if there is a transition phase and some blood that flows... it will make Java as a web platform much stronger. Best regards, Marky Pilgrim, Peter wrote: Hi 1) Is the WebWork name going to exi

Re: Tough Questions on Struts and Webwork Integration

By no means do I consider myself the authority to answer these, but here are some responses based on my understanding and my interest in how things go. In summary, really a lot of these questions are premature based on the likely pace of development, and as always, the community is going to se

Tough Questions on Struts and Webwork Integration

Hi 1) Is the WebWork name going to exist still? 2) Is the Struts name going to be annexed with WebWork? 3) A users has invested his or her hard-earned cash in `WebWork' in Action book. Will contents of this tome still be relevant in Struts? 4) In fact there are a number of such books on

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project struts-action (in module struts) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project struts-action has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affect

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project struts-action (in module struts) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project struts-action has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affect

display wrong german chars

My validator returns with wrong character in the case of an error. The form fields display the wrong character. I need the German character set (UTF-8). Someone can help me? thanks michele - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37685] New: - Javascript tag does not work on Mozilla

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37683] New: - document permitted form field names and provide a validation method

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu