[ANNOUNCEMENT] New Struts committer: Rich Feit

2005-12-18 Thread Don Brown
Please join me in welcoming Rich Feit as a new Struts committer. Rich is a Beehive committer and PMC member. In addition to being a Struts user for years (Beehive is built on Struts), he has been pivotal in designing and coding Struts Ti, both the initial annotationed Beehive version and the

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] New Struts committer: Rich Feit

2005-12-18 Thread James Mitchell
Welcome aboard sailor! -- James Mitchell 678.910.8017 Skpe: jmitchtx On Dec 18, 2005, at 4:06 PM, Don Brown wrote: Please join me in welcoming Rich Feit as a new Struts committer. Rich is a Beehive committer and PMC member. In addition to being a Struts user for years (Beehive is built

svn commit: r357515 - /struts/el/branches/STRUTS_1_2_BRANCH/project.xml

2005-12-18 Thread wsmoak
Author: wsmoak Date: Sun Dec 18 13:58:17 2005 New Revision: 357515 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=357515view=rev Log: Added missing properties tags around scope. These are hints for generating the Maven 2 pom, scope doesn't exist in the Maven 1 project model. Modified:

Bugzilla config

2005-12-18 Thread Wendy Smoak
I added a comment on Bug 33202, and it looks like the email only went to Joe. (The bug is assigned to him.) Shouldn't the emails always go to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, -- Wendy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

Bug report for Struts [2005/12/18]

2005-12-18 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33202] - DispatchChainAction needs review

2005-12-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33202. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Bugzilla config

2005-12-18 Thread Martin Cooper
On 12/18/05, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I added a comment on Bug 33202, and it looks like the email only went to Joe. (The bug is assigned to him.) Shouldn't the emails always go to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I believe this happened because Joe assigned the bug to himself. The default is

Removing ChainAction and DispatchChainAction

2005-12-18 Thread Wendy Smoak
On bugs 33202 and 33996 there is a proposal to remove ChainAction and DispatchChainAction. If we're going to do it before 1.3, now is the time. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33202 http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33996 I started a trivial example app to try

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37717] - struts-el-1.2.8.jar invalid in apache repsitory

2005-12-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37717. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Removing ChainAction and DispatchChainAction

2005-12-18 Thread Martin Cooper
On 12/18/05, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On bugs 33202 and 33996 there is a proposal to remove ChainAction and DispatchChainAction. If we're going to do it before 1.3, now is the time. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33202

Re: Removing ChainAction and DispatchChainAction

2005-12-18 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 12/18/05, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We're using ChainAction (I'm not a fan of Dispatch* ;) with Struts 1.2.8, where we don't have the luxury of the parameter mechanism for mapping actions to commands. While having this available in 1.3.x would slightly ease migration for us,

svn commit: r357591 - in /struts/extras/trunk/src/java/org/apache/struts/actions: ChainAction.java DispatchChainAction.java

2005-12-18 Thread wsmoak
Author: wsmoak Date: Sun Dec 18 16:49:43 2005 New Revision: 357591 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=357591view=rev Log: Removing ChainAction and DispatchChainAction as discussed on the dev list. Bug: 33202 Reported By: Joe Germuska Removed:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33996] - ChainAction does not support non-default catalogs

2005-12-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33996. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33202] - DispatchChainAction needs review

2005-12-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33202. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

svn commit: r357600 - in /struts/sandbox/trunk/ti/phase1/jars/legacy/src/java/org/apache/ti/legacy: LegacyObjectFactory.java PlugInInterceptor.java

2005-12-18 Thread mrdon
Author: mrdon Date: Sun Dec 18 17:13:39 2005 New Revision: 357600 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=357600view=rev Log: Adding an interceptor that supports Struts Action 1.x-style PlugIn classes, adding an object factory that passes the servlet context to interested interceptors Added:

svn commit: r357650 - in /struts/apps/trunk/blank/src/webapp/WEB-INF: struts-config.xml web.xml

2005-12-18 Thread wsmoak
Author: wsmoak Date: Sun Dec 18 22:04:03 2005 New Revision: 357650 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=357650view=rev Log: Use the chain config file from Tiles with the ComposableRequestProcessor (instead of using the TilesRequestProcessor.) Modified: