The only scenrio I can recall is for "mapped" properties:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27760
(although that is now fixed in subversion)
Niall
- Original Message -
From: "Rick Reumann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 3:39 AM
I just tested agai
I just tested again in a simplified application, and not sure what I was
smoking but it seems to be working fine. Sorry to have wasted the bandwidth.
(I swear though I've run into an odd situation before with an isProperty
construct before with Struts... and could have sworn I just ran into it wit
Author: wsmoak
Date: Mon Feb 27 19:01:33 2006
New Revision: 381546
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=381546&view=rev
Log:
Fixed broken link.
Modified:
struts/site/trunk/xdocs/mail.xml
Modified: struts/site/trunk/xdocs/mail.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/struts/site/trunk/xdocs/
+1!
Hubert
(Better late than ...)
On 2/24/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to nominate Wendy Smoak as the Most Valuable Committer in
> making the release of the new 1.3.0 builds possible.
>
> Along with James Mitchell, Wendy did the thankless scutwork of taking
> the Maven bui
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change
notification.
The following page has been changed by MichaelJouravlev:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsTaglibHtmlLink
-
Are you sure it doesn't work? I haven't used a "regular" ActionForm for a
while, but I am/was convinced BeanUtils handled this, since it uses the
standard property descriptors for a bean to get the read method - which it
then invokes to get the property value.
Niall
- Original Message -
Are there any plans to allow boolean ActionForm bean properties to
work correctly with the isSomeProperty vs having to use
getSomeProperty? Unless I'm crazy, it seems that the property of an
html:form element has to evaluate getSomeProperty in the ActionForm in
order to work correctly. (isWhatever
On 2/27/06, Konstantin Priblouda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Where is the jar that's causing the problem?
>
> Judging from ivy.xml of affected project version is
> ( tiles-core ):
> 0.2-20060215
For the record, (most of the thread is on webwork-dev)
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change
notification.
The following page has been changed by Adobex:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/FrontPage
--
* StrutsResource
--- Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/27/06, Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Java 5 is not required to compile Standalone
> Tiles. It looks like
> > whoever built the JAR that is currently posted
> built it using Java
> > 5. I'm not really sure how that process works
> r
On 2/27/06, Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Java 5 is not required to compile Standalone Tiles. It looks like
> whoever built the JAR that is currently posted built it using Java
> 5. I'm not really sure how that process works right now.
Where is the jar that's causing the problem?
On
On 2/27/06, Patrick Lightbody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can someone comment on this?
>
> http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=20203
Sorry, this is probably my fault for building it with JDK 1.5 without
setting the target to 1.4.
I'll fix the build and the snapshots tonight. Me
Java 5 is not required to compile Standalone Tiles. It looks like
whoever built the JAR that is currently posted built it using Java
5. I'm not really sure how that process works right now. You could
download the project and build it yourself in the meantime. I use
the maven build all t
Can someone comment on this?
http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=20203
-
Posted via Jive Forums
http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=20229&messageID=39324#39324
Wendy,
find -type f -exec chmod 664 {} ";"
should do it. That will run chmod on all regular files under the
starting directory. If you're in the dtd/ directory, you can just use .
for that.
- George
> -Original Message-
> From: Wendy Smoak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent:
15 matches
Mail list logo
