DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22357] - isCancelled does not work as intended if ActionMapping does not have a form

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Cactus tests via Maven

On 3/9/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > OK, looks like MultipartBoundaryInputStreamTest isn't being run and I > can't > find any evidence of it ever having been run - even in Struts 1.1 when > that > test was added. The class its testing (MultipartBoundaryInputStream) has > been d

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Struts 1.2.9 test build available

I can be done, but we don't do it. Once we've tagged a version, we don't change it. If its important enough to affect the quality of the release - then we roll another version. Niall - Original Message - From: "Paul Benedict" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 2:23 AM > B

Re: Bylaws and Releases

If I remember correctly, Tomcat announces each release publically and calls them "alpha" before GA. I think Ted has a good point, but I don't want to quibble over "alpha" or "test" since, as Wendy pointed out, it is a release. As long as the user list knows it's not an official version, which was M

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Struts 1.2.9 test build available

Thanks for the feedback Henri. I've closed the two bugs you mentioned and fixed the broken link. Sorry for the confusion, if theres another release in the 1.2.x series I'll try to make the release notes clearer (it was just trying to explain the two sets of revision numbers shown for each change).

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Struts 1.2.9 test build available

But in CVS, you can retag files for a certain version. Can you do it also for SVN? --- Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Good point, however 1.2.9 is tagged now and this would mean rolling a > 1.2.10. The release notes refer to the "upgrade notes" on the wiki - if > 1.2.9 gets voted "G

svn commit: r384679 - /struts/action/branches/STRUTS_1_2_BRANCH/doc/learning.xml

Author: niallp Date: Thu Mar 9 18:22:40 2006 New Revision: 384679 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=384679&view=rev Log: Fix ibatis petstore link - thanks to Henri Yandell for reporting this Modified: struts/action/branches/STRUTS_1_2_BRANCH/doc/learning.xml Modified: struts/action/bra

Re: Cactus tests via Maven

OK, looks like MultipartBoundaryInputStreamTest isn't being run and I can't find any evidence of it ever having been run - even in Struts 1.1 when that test was added. The class its testing (MultipartBoundaryInputStream) has been deprecated in favour of Commons Fileupload (and removed in Struts 1.3

Re: Cactus tests via Maven

On 3/9/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not sure that the maven build has ever been sorted out to work properly > in the 1.2.x branch and for 1.2.x and before ant is the official build > process. Its only since 1.3.x that we adopted maven and got it to work > properly. I ran the

Re: Bylaws and Releases

On 3/9/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I agree with Martin. Me, too. We need to fix /releases.html, which is inconsistent with recent history and sentiment. :) " The test build can be posted to the internal distribution directory (svn.apache.org/struts/) and announced to the St

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38343] - [extras] ParameterListActionDispatcher

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37817] - TagUtils doesn't create XHTML compliant URLs when called from LinkTag when using forwards defined with redirect="true"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Struts 1.2.9 test build available

Damn - didn't notice this this morning and could have spent a good chunk of the day looking at the release. Still, there's always tomorrow. First thoughts: The site says: "After Version 1.2.6 was tagged the 1.2 Branch was created" and then has a table of bugfixes. I had to look at the 1.2.8 si

Re: Bylaws and Releases

I agree with Martin. Niall - Original Message - From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 1:33 AM On 3/9/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3/9/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I do agree that we should make sure people underst

Re: Bylaws and Releases

On 3/9/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3/9/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I do agree that we should make sure people understand that it's not a > > release, but I don't think we need to assume that the user@ audience is > too > > dumb to recognise the distinction

Re: Cactus tests via Maven

I'm not sure that the maven build has ever been sorted out to work properly in the 1.2.x branch and for 1.2.x and before ant is the official build process. Its only since 1.3.x that we adopted maven and got it to work properly. I ran the tests today and they all passed, but I will check if this tes

Re: Bylaws and Releases

On 3/9/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry, but I'm going to keep quoting the bylaws until I understand how > this works. > > " After a proposed release is built, it must be tested and classified > before being released to the general public. The proposed release may > be assigned "A

Cactus tests via Maven

When I run the Cactus tests through Maven against Tomcat 4.1.31, I get three failed tests in the MultipartBoundaryInputStreamTest. I'm on the 1.2.X branch. I presume that people mostly do it with Ant, so will dig into getting that setup, but thought I'd report the problem. Hen Errors follow:

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Struts 1.2.9 test build available

Good point, however 1.2.9 is tagged now and this would mean rolling a 1.2.10. The release notes refer to the "upgrade notes" on the wiki - if 1.2.9 gets voted "GA" quality, I will add a 1.2.9 upgrade page and will include it there. Niall - Original Message - From: "Paul Benedict" <[EMAIL

Re: Bylaws and Releases

On 3/9/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If we are going to announce unsanctioned builds to user@, then, > please, let's at least call them *ALPHA* builds, so that these > unilateral "trial balloons" are not confused with an actual beta > release, approved by the PMC. Sorry, but I'm goi

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Struts 1.2.9 test build available

Niall, do you want to copy the upgrade notes that Ted strongly recommended we had in 1.3 for the cancellation change? http://struts.apache.org/struts-action/userGuide/release-notes.html __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best sp

Re: Bylaws and Releases

On 3/9/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I do agree that we should make sure people understand that it's not a > release, but I don't think we need to assume that the user@ audience is too > dumb to recognise the distinction between a Test Build and a Release. I wouldn't use the word

Re: [shale] remoting XhtmlHelper.mapResourceId()

On 3/9/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Craig, I just moderated this through...again. Not sure why your > message was hung in moderation. This message from me was hung up because I replied from my work email account (because Ed had cc'd me there to help track down what was going

Re: [shale] remoting XhtmlHelper.mapResourceId()

Craig, I just moderated this through...again. Not sure why your message was hung in moderation. Oh well. -- James Mitchell EdgeTech, Inc. http://edgetechservices.net/ 678.910.8017 Skype: jmitchtx On Mar 4, 2006, at 6:25 PM, Craig McClanahan wrote: Really strange that I don't see this on

Re: [shale] remoting XhtmlHelper.mapResourceId()

Really strange that I don't see this on the list. Will need to investigate that further. Ed Burns wrote: Hello, When using the Mechanism.DYNAMIC_RESOURCE feature to call a MethodBinding, the javadocs don't say anything about request query parameters and how they relate to deriving the Method

Re: Bylaws and Releases

On 3/9/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would agree that we don't need to vote on Release Plans that have > been maintained for three or more days in plain sight on the wiki. > > But, I would suggest that we not announce "test builds" to the user > list until the distribution has pas

Re: Bylaws and Releases

I would agree that we don't need to vote on Release Plans that have been maintained for three or more days in plain sight on the wiki. But, I would suggest that we not announce "test builds" to the user list until the distribution has passed a qualty vote and earned a beta or GA designation. An a

svn commit: r384559 - in /struts/el/branches/STRUTS_1_2_BRANCH: build.xml project.xml

Author: niallp Date: Thu Mar 9 09:13:40 2006 New Revision: 384559 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=384559&view=rev Log: Roll the version number in the 1.2.x branch Modified: struts/el/branches/STRUTS_1_2_BRANCH/build.xml struts/el/branches/STRUTS_1_2_BRANCH/project.xml Modified: s

svn commit: r384558 - in /struts/action/branches/STRUTS_1_2_BRANCH: build.xml project.xml

Author: niallp Date: Thu Mar 9 09:13:09 2006 New Revision: 384558 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=384558&view=rev Log: Roll the version number in the 1.2.x branch Modified: struts/action/branches/STRUTS_1_2_BRANCH/build.xml struts/action/branches/STRUTS_1_2_BRANCH/project.xml Mod

[Struts Wiki] Update of "StrutsRelease129" by NiallPemberton

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by NiallPemberton: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease129 The comment on the change is: Update test build checklist

[ANNOUNCE] Struts 1.2.9 test build available

The Struts 1.2.9 test build is now available for dowload here: http://cvs.apache.org/dist/struts/v1.2.9/ Release Notes: http://struts.apache.org/struts-doc-1.2.x/userGuide/release-notes.html Documentation: http://struts.apache.org/struts-doc-1.2.x/ At this point no "quality" label (i.e. "alpha"

svn commit: r384531 - /struts/action/tags/STRUTS_1_2_9/

Author: niallp Date: Thu Mar 9 07:18:16 2006 New Revision: 384531 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=384531&view=rev Log: Update externals in 1.2.9 tag Modified: struts/action/tags/STRUTS_1_2_9/ (props changed) Propchange: struts/action/tags/STRUTS_1_2_9/ -

svn commit: r384526 - /struts/sandbox/tags/STRUTS_1_2_9/

Author: niallp Date: Thu Mar 9 07:08:26 2006 New Revision: 384526 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=384526&view=rev Log: Tag Struts 1.2.9 Added: struts/sandbox/tags/STRUTS_1_2_9/ - copied from r384525, struts/sandbox/branches/STRUTS_1_2_BRANCH/ --

svn commit: r384525 - /struts/faces/tags/STRUTS_1_2_9/

Author: niallp Date: Thu Mar 9 07:07:53 2006 New Revision: 384525 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=384525&view=rev Log: Tag Struts 1.2.9 Added: struts/faces/tags/STRUTS_1_2_9/ - copied from r384524, struts/faces/branches/STRUTS_1_2_BRANCH/ --

svn commit: r384524 - /struts/el/tags/STRUTS_1_2_9/

Author: niallp Date: Thu Mar 9 07:07:07 2006 New Revision: 384524 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=384524&view=rev Log: Tag Struts 1.2.9 Added: struts/el/tags/STRUTS_1_2_9/ - copied from r384523, struts/el/branches/STRUTS_1_2_BRANCH/

svn commit: r384523 - /struts/action/tags/STRUTS_1_2_9/

Author: niallp Date: Thu Mar 9 07:05:59 2006 New Revision: 384523 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=384523&view=rev Log: Tag Struts 1.2.9 Added: struts/action/tags/STRUTS_1_2_9/ - copied from r384522, struts/action/branches/STRUTS_1_2_BRANCH/

[Struts Wiki] Update of "StrutsRelease129" by NiallPemberton

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by NiallPemberton: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease129 The comment on the change is: Testing Checklist completed ---

svn commit: r384519 - /struts/action/branches/STRUTS_1_2_BRANCH/web/examples/WEB-INF/validator/validation.xml

Author: niallp Date: Thu Mar 9 06:57:50 2006 New Revision: 384519 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=384519&view=rev Log: Corret error in the type form validation in struts-examples webapp - still validating a field which has been removed. Modified: struts/action/branches/STRUTS_1_2_BR

svn commit: r384512 - in /struts/sandbox/trunk/action2/apps/cookbook/src: java/cookbook2/ webapp/ webapp/WEB-INF/classes/ webapp/pages/Hello/ webapp/pages/Select/ webapp/pages/Simple/

Author: husted Date: Thu Mar 9 05:53:33 2006 New Revision: 384512 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=384512&view=rev Log: Action2 cookbook2 * Work in progress * Looing for alternative to bean:resource/bean:write to display source files. Added: struts/sandbox/trunk/action2/apps/cookbook/

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36813] - Support xhtml1.1 output

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38345] - Add support for XHTML 1.1 and XHTML 2.0 etc.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38784] - LoadBundle basename property is not set

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36813] - Support xhtml1.1 output

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu