Re: html taglib autocomplete

On 3/26/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am late on this conversation, but I want to offer a suggestion. > Some tag libraries which render HTML elements allow you to > pass-through other attributes. In JSP 2.1 (maybe 2.0 too), there is > an implicit attributes object for any attribu

[shale] request/flash scope

After trying shale out over the last few months it does seem to add enough features to make even using the refence implemention of jsf 1.1 a real option for production applications. The only thing stopping me is the issue of being forced to use session scope for backing beans. I saw that the evalu

Re: WebWork renaming strategy

if use "struts" in tag prefix or document or properties ,it will bring some confusion i think "ww" for tag prefix is better and package name use "org.apache.webwork" :) - Posted via Jive Forums http://forums.opensymphony.com/

Re: taglib cactus

On 3/25/06, Mark Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/25/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3/25/06, Mark Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I've been running the cactus tests for the tag lib and a get a lot of > > > errors. I'm not bitching I just want to know what the curr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39107] - autocomplete attribute

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Struts 1.3.1 - When?

On 3/25/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Now that 1.2 is EOL (end of line), what's the timeframe > for the 1.3.1 release? I ask this because now that so many > people are dedicated to 2.0, I am a bit concerned this product > might drop out of people's sight. -- Paul I don't think

Re: [VOTE] Struts Shale v1.0.2 Quality

On 3/26/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The vote results are as follows: > > Binding PMC Member votes: >Wendy Smoak - Alpha >Gary VanMatre - Alpha >Craig McClanahan - Alpha > > Non-binding: >Sean Schofield - Alpha > > Therefore, Shale 1.0.2 is designated as "Alpha" qu

Re: [VOTE] Struts Shale v1.0.2 Quality

The vote results are as follows: Binding PMC Member votes: Wendy Smoak - Alpha Gary VanMatre - Alpha Craig McClanahan - Alpha Non-binding: Sean Schofield - Alpha Therefore, Shale 1.0.2 is designated as "Alpha" quality. Craig, as far as I can tell, there was never an announcement for

Re: [VOTE] Struts Shale v1.0.2 Quality

On 3/22/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > After correcting packaging problems with the Shale 1.0.1 test build, > and following the release plan which is available on the Wiki, > > http://wiki.apache.org/struts/ShaleRelease102 > > the Struts Shale v1.0.2 test build has been completed

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39107] - autocomplete attribute

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39107] - autocomplete attribute

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39107] - autocomplete attribute

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[WebWork2] TODO

The big item on the Incubator TODO list is verifying distribution rights. The items here are (1) Verify that the files that have been donated have been updated to reflect the new ASF copyright. (2) Verify that for all code included with the distribution that is not under the Apache license, we ha

Re: Maven 2 repository containing Action 1.3?

Either will work, thanks. Don Wendy Smoak wrote: On 3/22/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is there a Maven 2 repository that contains Action 1.3 jars? These were done with 'mvn deploy' from struts/current/build: http://cvs.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/org/apache/

Re: Maven 2 repository containing Action 1.3?

On 3/22/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there a Maven 2 repository that contains Action 1.3 jars? These were done with 'mvn deploy' from struts/current/build: http://cvs.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/org/apache/struts/action/ http://cvs.apache.org/maven-snapshot-reposi

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39107] - autocomplete attribute

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39107] - autocomplete attribute

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Bug report for Struts [2006/03/26]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Re: [action] Maven groupId and svn repo structure

On 3/17/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We need to decide on a Maven groupId for Struts Action. Currently, > we're using 'struts' but we've been asked to conform to the Maven 2 > repository structure and place our artifacts under org/apache/struts. > > My plan is to use org.apache.str

svn commit: r388965 - in /struts: build/trunk/pom.xml tiles/trunk/pom.xml

Author: wsmoak Date: Sun Mar 26 13:00:07 2006 New Revision: 388965 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=388965&view=rev Log: Add a snapshot repository to so that 'mvn deploy' will work. Modified: struts/build/trunk/pom.xml struts/tiles/trunk/pom.xml Modified: struts/build/trunk/pom.x

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39107] - autocomplete attribute

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39107] - autocomplete attribute

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: html taglib autocomplete

I cannot argue. You make a great case. But there must be leniance for those who want to generate other attributes. I guess I don't have the answer yet. :-) --- Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/26/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I am late on this conversation, b

svn commit: r388954 - in /struts: action/trunk/ apps/trunk/ apps/trunk/blank/ apps/trunk/cookbook/ apps/trunk/examples/ apps/trunk/mailreader-dao/ apps/trunk/mailreader/ build/trunk/ el/trunk/ extras/

Author: wsmoak Date: Sun Mar 26 12:19:42 2006 New Revision: 388954 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=388954&view=rev Log: Change the Maven groupId to 'org.apache.struts.action' and 'org.apache.struts.tiles' and correct the version numbers. Note: Struts Tiles no longer inherits from build/pr

Re: html taglib autocomplete

On 3/26/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/26/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I am late on this conversation, but I want to offer a suggestion. > > Some tag libraries which render HTML elements allow you to > > pass-through other attributes. In JSP 2.1 (maybe 2

Message in console

Hi, Can anyone help me out.I am suing Strts. I get the below message in console.Not sure what I miss . Could anyone let me know how to avoid these messages filling up the console? Thanks in advance, org.apache.struts.util.PropertyMessageresources Initializing,config='org.apache.struts.taglib.bean

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39107] - autocomplete attribute

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39107] - autocomplete attribute

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39107] - autocomplete attribute

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39107] New: - autocomplete attribute

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: html taglib autocomplete

On 3/26/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am late on this conversation, but I want to offer a suggestion. > Some tag libraries which render HTML elements allow you to > pass-through other attributes. In JSP 2.1 (maybe 2.0 too), there is > an implicit attributes object for any attri

Re: html taglib autocomplete

On 3/26/06, Mark Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I just went to submit the a patch, and did a search for autocomplete > before I added a new bug and fund 5 or so entries came up.. The last > ones were 2004, all the comments basically said "autocomplete isn't > part of the html spec so struts ht

Re: html taglib autocomplete

I am late on this conversation, but I want to offer a suggestion. Some tag libraries which render HTML elements allow you to pass-through other attributes. In JSP 2.1 (maybe 2.0 too), there is an implicit attributes object for any attributes which were not explicitly defined. In the ValueList tag l

Re: html taglib autocomplete

I just went to submit the a patch, and did a search for autocomplete before I added a new bug and fund 5 or so entries came up.. The last ones were 2004, all the comments basically said "autocomplete isn't part of the html spec so struts html taglib wont do it".. While I know the html spec hasn't

Re: WebWork renaming strategy *revised*

Well, my suggestion of org.apache.struts.web as the package name (in anticipation of XWork becoming something like org.apache.struts.core) actually achieves #3 without the problems you have mentioned in #3, since (as far as I know) org.apache.struts.web does not conflict with existing classes.

Re: WebWork renaming strategy *revised*

On 3/26/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3/25/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3/25/06, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I think there's something here. Certainly, Gabe articulates my > > > dissatisfaction with action2 -- it is possible to imagine a > >

Re: WebWork renaming strategy *revised*

On 3/25/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/25/06, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think there's something here. Certainly, Gabe articulates my > > dissatisfaction with action2 -- it is possible to imagine a > > revolution from Struts 2 to Struts 3 which does not require

Re: Struts 1.3.1 - When?

Paul Benedict wrote: Now that 1.2 is EOL (end of line), what's the timeframe for the 1.3.1 release? I ask this because now that so many people are dedicated to 2.0, I am a bit concerned this product might drop out of people's sight. -- Paul I believe that is the intention, for Webwork (rechrist