Hi guys,
Got some questions :-
1] When is action2's snapshot in maven repository updated? Is it on a daily
basis?
2] In Continuum, is it posible for user to download a particular successful
build, say for example build 15 of action2?
3] If a user wants to get a copy of action2 snapshot, but doe
On 6/15/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I knew I'd seen this somewhere. In settings.xml, lets try
> / and /.
>
> * http://maven.apache.org/maven-settings/settings.html
That seems worthwhile playing with. I presume these are Unix-format
settings.
Hmm ... from my experieme
On 6/15/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/15/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Further info ... it didn't get the shale-parent POM correct
either. Maybe
> it is something specific to deploying things with a setting
of
> "pom".
Are you still talking about permiss
On 6/15/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Further info ... it didn't get the shale-parent POM correct either. Maybe
it is something specific to deploying things with a setting of
"pom".
Are you still talking about permissions, or is there something wrong
with the content?
I kn
On 6/15/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/15/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/15/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > That did it. Thanks.
>
> Except for the file permissions... when you have a minute, can you log
> in and fix them?
Done
On 6/15/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/15/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That did it. Thanks.
Except for the file permissions... when you have a minute, can you log
in and fix them?
Done.
And if anyone knows how to convince it to set the group writeable
On 6/15/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That did it. Thanks.
Except for the file permissions... when you have a minute, can you log
in and fix them?
And if anyone knows how to convince it to set the group writeable bit
when you scp files up, I'd love to know.
(Yes, my umask
On 6/15/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/15/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I deployed the framework JARs (and shale-parent POM) ... but it's still
> missing the shale-apps-parent POM. Can I deploy just that without
deploying
> the applications themseves? That
On 6/15/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I deployed the framework JARs (and shale-parent POM) ... but it's still
missing the shale-apps-parent POM. Can I deploy just that without deploying
the applications themseves? That would work, but seems wasteful of space on
the server.
On 6/15/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/15/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> An interesting question is how we make it possible to do step 4 (build
the
> sample apps from source) without doing step 2 (build the framework from
> source). I presume that means we'd
On 6/15/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
An interesting question is how we make it possible to do step 4 (build the
sample apps from source) without doing step 2 (build the framework from
source). I presume that means we'd need to publish the "shale-parent" and
"shale-apps-parent
Ted Husted wrote:
You might at least want to start those discussions about the
checkstyle settings, so that we can develop a strategy about how they
would be fixed the next time there is a window of opportunity.
Fair enough...
I saw two issues that seem to account for a large number of the
co
Thanks to incredible support from Wendy, James, Gary, et. al., it looks like
we've got a viable organization of the repository for Shale in the
"mvn_reorg" branch. There's work to be done yet on the generated website,
but the basic architecture seems sound. But there is one more thing I'd
like t
>From: "Craig McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On 6/15/06, stephan opitz wrote:
> >
> > hello,
> >
> > shale has a lot of new features:
> >
> > View Controller: Backing bean for JSP with predefined events
> > Validations: Client- and service-side validations
> > JNDI: JSP access to prop
On 6/15/06, stephan opitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hello,
shale has a lot of new features:
View Controller: Backing bean for JSP with predefined events
Validations: Client- and service-side validations
JNDI: JSP access to properties in web.xml
Dialog Manager: Web wizards (workflows) driven b
[moved to dev list]
On 6/15/06, Gary VanMatre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My second attempt was to add the cargo.jvmarg to the /shale-apps pom.xml:
What did you do after that? If you didn't 'mvn install -N' that pom,
it may not have taken effect. (It's supposed to look for ../pom.xml
for the
You might at least want to start those discussions about the
checkstyle settings, so that we can develop a strategy about how they
would be fixed the next time there is a window of opportunity.
When I did a a time study in February, curing the the current errors
with the current settings would ta
Ok, my head is spinning :)
I like simple, so, I'll say the same thing I remember saying months ago...
just ping me when the time is right to deal with Checkstyle complaints,
and so long as I still have some free time then, I'll do it.
You have someone willing to do the work, I'll let you worry ab
The problem is patches. People will tend to write patches against
whatever version they are using. If we make a lot of changes right
after a popular release, then a lot of the patches people submit back
won't work. The ideal time for broad refactorings is at the beginning
of a minor series (pre #.
Ok, cool Niall... I guess we maybe need to decide what the "wait point"
really is here... do we want to wait for GA before I generate these
patches, or just the next release? At first I thought Ted was saying
let's wait for GA, but then it sounded like maybe just wait for 1.3.5
(which may or may n
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On 6/15/06, John Sanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was working on a bug for a project using struts 1.2.9 involving
internationalization and one of our subclasses of LookupDispatchAction.
The bug initially seemed to be straightforward because we were getting
exceptions w
On 6/15/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, June 15, 2006 6:35 am, Ted Husted wrote:
> In the meantime, that would give Frank time to work on those patches.
So you don't want to wait for GA now? That's fine with me... I'm not sure
I can take care of all the complaints by J
On 6/15/06, John Sanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was working on a bug for a project using struts 1.2.9 involving
internationalization and one of our subclasses of LookupDispatchAction.
The bug initially seemed to be straightforward because we were getting
exceptions with a familiar stacktrace
I was working on a bug for a project using struts 1.2.9 involving
internationalization and one of our subclasses of LookupDispatchAction.
The bug initially seemed to be straightforward because we were getting
exceptions with a familiar stacktrace that read something like,
missing resource in k
On Thu, June 15, 2006 6:35 am, Ted Husted wrote:
> In the meantime, that would give Frank time to work on those patches.
So you don't want to wait for GA now? That's fine with me... I'm not sure
I can take care of all the complaints by July, but I should be able to get
rid of enough of them to m
On 6/15/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Author: craigmcc
Date: Thu Jun 15 00:24:49 2006
New Revision: 414495
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=414495&view=rev
Log:
Include the binary JAR files for Shale in the assembly. FIXME - why
does the element work in shale-dist, but
hello,
shale has a lot of new features:
View Controller: Backing bean for JSP with predefined events
Validations: Client- and service-side validations
JNDI: JSP access to properties in web.xml
Dialog Manager: Web wizards (workflows) driven by XML configuration files
Application Manager: An appli
If no one else wants to step up, then I can do it first thing come
July, but not before.
In the meantime, that would give Frank time to work on those patches.
-Ted.
On 6/14/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/13/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Right now, Wendy has been
28 matches
Mail list logo
