On 7/14/06, Apache Wiki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The following page has been changed by MichaelJouravlev:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/FrontPage
+ == Other ==
-
- == Obsolete or not relevant anymore ==
=== Shale Framework ===
Thanks. :)
A couple that can be deleted: the JavaOne2006
On 7/14/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As far as I know, StrutsTi is still in play, there's a "Phase 2"
planned after the initial WW -> Struts work. Don?
I'm -1 on deleting any of the proposals. We can update them with
remarks as to the current status, but we should retain them as
[moved from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 7/14/06, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/14/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsHaiku
> * http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsLimerick
I was really tempted to remove these pages ;-)))
Anyone
Ok, well, I can ask if we can contribute them.
> Ok, if people are ready to do the work now, I'm fine
> with adding them. The
> background on this is I want to get the 2.0.0 release
> out by the end of the
> month. While it will probably just be a an alpha or
> beta, we still have a lot
> of
This is great, Wendy, thanks! One somewhat unique requirement I think we'll
have is aggregated Javadocs not only including our modules, but also xwork.
Would that be possible?
Don
Wendy Smoak wrote:
A first pass at Struts 2 distribution assemblies has been checked in.
It builds with:
cd ~/s
Ok, if people are ready to do the work now, I'm fine with adding them. The
background on this is I want to get the 2.0.0 release out by the end of the
month. While it will probably just be a an alpha or beta, we still have a lot
of loose ends to tie up before then including documentation, the
Good to know, thanks. For this case, since the code is in the webwork
repository, I think it makes sense to open it at OpenSymphony. They also have
the best resources and existing user community.
Don
Ted Husted wrote:
On 7/13/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyways, the point woul
On 7/14/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But, why do we chant
$ mvn install site -Papp,pre-assembly
for s1, but only
$ mvn install
for s2?
We do this because for s2 we haven't yet
* split out the apps from the s2 default build. (-Papps, to make the
default build fast)
* set it up
On 7/14/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A first pass at Struts 2 distribution assemblies has been checked in.
It builds with:
cd ~/svn/struts/current/struts2
mvn install; cd assembly; mvn assembly:assembly
WW-1378 is open if you have comments.
Very cool!
But, why do we chant
$ mv
On 7/13/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyways, the point would be to create an
outside ASF project
BTW, the Struts SouceForge site supports Subversion now.
I'm helping a friend convert a JSP scriptlet-based application to
Struts 2, and we are doing the work there.
-Ted.
--
On 7/13/06, tm jee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I guess I am the one who volunteered, and I still do. If Jason could contribute
the code of
those components, I could work on the docs, showcase etc, it would be
doable within the
time frame. Else I think this will have to wait then.
The Struts 1
On 7/14/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/13/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In maven 2 speak is that a scope of "provided"? I can add that to the
> Chain project.xml which would be good if there are any future Chain
> releases - whether the existing 1.1 pom can be
12 matches
Mail list logo
