On 7/26/06, Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What is SWF? I might have missed this acro :-[.
SWF == Spring Web Flow
http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/spring/display/WEBFLOW/Home
./alex
Craig
Oke... stupid me... it was obvious.
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
On 7/27/06, Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What is SWF? I might have missed this acro :-[.
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
On 7/27/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eric Molitor wrote:
> http://forum
What is SWF? I might have missed this acro :-[.
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
On 7/27/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eric Molitor wrote:
http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=14251&tstart=15A
> At "The Spring Experience" in Miami Keith Donald,
> Myself, and Matthew
Eric Molitor wrote:
http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=14251&tstart=15A
At "The Spring Experience" in Miami Keith Donald,
Myself, and Matthew Porter worked out a way it could
be done and it was pretty simple. Once SAF2 starts
solidifying I'd like to start playing around wit
On 7/24/06, Patrick Lightbody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The snippet binary is attached with a comment indicating the source and date.
Assuming the Java.net source is current, could we patch it for the
latest (and hopefully) last changes
- org.apache.struts.action2.
+ org.apache.struts2.
-
h
I'm curious as to why the a tag is targeted for the Ajax theme but not
so much for XHTML.
* http://confluence.twdata.org/display/WW/a
Right now, the preferred idiom for a localized link with parameters seems to be:
en
Why is it that we don't roll more of
On 7/26/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The URL tag isn't meant to be used with a query string. The best way to write
this would be:
Well, since "en" is a constant, and not a stack reference, it needs to
be quoted or parametized itself.
Here's three idioms that work:
Language
Done.
Eric Molitor wrote:
I just created and attached a patch to WW-1394 to update SAF2 to use
Spring 1.2.8. This should resolve some silly spring issues that exist
in 1.2.6 (and 1.2.7).
(I have a more complex patch to update some of the spring integration
but that needs to wait for Spring 2.00
I just created and attached a patch to WW-1394 to update SAF2 to use
Spring 1.2.8. This should resolve some silly spring issues that exist
in 1.2.6 (and 1.2.7).
(I have a more complex patch to update some of the spring integration
but that needs to wait for Spring 2.00)
Someone should take a gan
Another reason why returning Results directly would be nice is it
would make it much easier to add zero-config Action scripting support.
Here is a case where you would want to write Actions in a scripting
language like Groovy or Javascript, but not want any external
configuration. Conventions, co
With the understanding that this is an issue that needs to be treated carefully
to avoid confusion, I think we should really give some serious thought to this.
As someone who _has_ actually done annotation-based result mapping (I have
setups with no xwork.xml - I can explain more if requested),
Cool, I added the version to the javadoc plugin. When I get time, I'll do the
same for the other ones.
Don
Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 7/26/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yep, that broke it. I wouldn't exactly consider it really broken,
however,
since a clean Maven install would still
Correct, the includeParams attribute needs to be set to 'none'.
> The URL tag isn't meant to be used with a query
> string. The best way to write
> this would be:
>
>
>
> s:url>
>
> The reason is the url tag has this "includeParams"
> tag, which can automatically
> include all the query s
+1
> On 7/26/06, Don Brown (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I noticed this as well. If no one steps up to
> maintain it, I'm inclined to remove it
> >competely. I'd like to minimize the number of
> example applications
> we maintain, and it
> >seems like any advanced AJAX shopping cart coul
On 7/26/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yep, that broke it. I wouldn't exactly consider it really broken, however,
since a clean Maven install would still work.
I'm not sure what you mean. Someone new to Maven would download the
latest javadoc plugin, now 2.0, and it wouldn't work.
Yep, that broke it. I wouldn't exactly consider it really broken, however,
since a clean Maven install would still work. Can't we require certain versions
of plugins to avoid this problem? I'm really getting tired of all these plugin
version inconsistencies.
Don
Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 7/26
or
would do as well.
- Original Message
From: Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Struts Developers List
Sent: Thursday, 27 July, 2006 12:27:05 AM
Subject: Re: [s2] Request parameter weirdness
The URL tag isn't meant to be used with a query string. The best way to write
this would be:
On 7/26/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yep:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] struts2]$ mvn site
[INFO] Scanning for projects...
...
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
Hmmm... try this: 'mvn site -U'
It fails for me with both maven-javadoc-plugin 2.0 and 2.1-SNAPSHOT
built from source. I wonder if you're
Yep:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] struts2]$ mvn site
[INFO] Scanning for projects...
[INFO] snapshot org.apache.struts:struts-master:3-SNAPSHOT: checking for updates
from snapshots-maven-codehaus
[INFO] snapshot org.apache.struts:struts-master:3-SNAPSHOT: checking for updates
from apache
[INFO] snapshot o
On 7/26/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hmm...the build works for me. Perhaps you have a snapshot javadoc plugin
somewhere that is causing the problem?
Don, 'mvn site' works for you?
I get the same thing as Ted. It's coming from the aggregate=true
configuration for maven-javadoc-pl
Ted Husted wrote:
On 7/26/06, Don Brown (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I noticed this as well. If no one steps up to maintain it, I'm
inclined to remove it
competely. I'd like to minimize the number of example applications
we maintain, and it
seems like any advanced AJAX shopping cart cou
Hmm...the build works for me. Perhaps you have a snapshot javadoc plugin
somewhere that is causing the problem?
Don
Ted Husted wrote:
On 7/26/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now that Continuum is (or was) up and running, I'd like to let
Continuum publish the web site as well.
I think that is a reasonable compromise, although it will take a rewrite of the
wildcard processing. Any objections before I open an XWork ticket for this?
Don
tm jee wrote:
What about this, if we an action of "invoice_submit_ajax"
- invoice_{*}_{*} where {1} will gives "submit" and {2} w
The URL tag isn't meant to be used with a query string. The best way to write
this would be:
The reason is the url tag has this "includeParams" tag, which can automatically
include all the query string parameters in the URL. The default value is GET,
meaning all the GET parameters will
On 7/26/06, Jason Carreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I understand that there are different ways to skin the cat, but what if I
want to reuse my actions in different contexts? What if I want to call my
action from a JBPM workflow? Do I need to subclass it to override the result
that's returned?
So, in the MailReader app, we are changing the locale via a link like this:
Language Options
">English
">Japanese
">Russian
But, when the link is invoked, it starts rewriting the selected value
back to all the links. (Try it and see.0
* http://planetstruts.org/struts2-mailreader/Welc
On Jul 26, 2006, at 11:00 AM, Jason Carreira wrote:
I understand that there are different ways to skin the cat, but
what if I want to reuse my actions in different contexts? What if I
want to call my action from a JBPM workflow? Do I need to subclass
it to override the result that's returne
> Being able to return Result instances from Actions
> doesn't
> necessarily mean the lack of reuse of Results. This
> is equivalent to
> saying that because it's Java code you can't reuse
> it. I didn't
> realize that XML was the solution to lack of reuse in
> OO ;)
>
> Seriously though,
> > Oh please no... please no abstract methods with
> magic implementations. What happens when you go to
> debug the class?
>
> The debugger would step from your action into the
> result. You rave
> about Hibernate and AOP; how do you debug those?
>
It's one of the biggest problems with them. We
See also
* http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1393
* http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?messageID=45763닃
-Ted.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please join us in welcoming Antonio Petrelli as a Struts committer.
Antonio has been an active contributor on the mailing lists for quite
some time and has contributed patches and ideas to the development of
Tiles. We look forward to Antonio's contributions and his ability to
commit his o
On 7/26/06, Don Brown (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I noticed this as well. If no one steps up to maintain it, I'm inclined to
remove it
competely. I'd like to minimize the number of example applications
we maintain, and it
seems like any advanced AJAX shopping cart could just as easily
Being able to return Result instances from Actions doesn't
necessarily mean the lack of reuse of Results. This is equivalent to
saying that because it's Java code you can't reuse it. I didn't
realize that XML was the solution to lack of reuse in OO ;)
Seriously though, it's not uncommon i
I'm finally ready to give this a try, Patrick.
I usually use "husted" as an account name for ASF/Struts related stuff.
-Ted.
On 5/5/06, Patrick Lightbody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My company, Autoriginate (http://www.autoriginate.com), has donated a free
HostedQA account to all Struts develo
On 7/26/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now that Continuum is (or was) up and running, I'd like to let
Continuum publish the web site as well. More on this later (and
probably in a different thread).
FWIW, the infrastructure group has indicated a preference that we
check the web
I might be able to help more the infrastructure after August 20.
Unfoturnately, most of the time I had set aside this month to work on
s2, went into s1. Now, it will be all I can do to nail down the
examples and documentation. There's still a ton of work to do on that
front, and it also looks like
What about this, if we an action of "invoice_submit_ajax"
- invoice_{*}_{*} where {1} will gives "submit" and {2} will gives "ajax"
- invoice_{**} where {1} will gives "submit_ajax"
- invoice_{method}_{way} where {method} will gives "submit" and {way} will
gives "ajax"
- invoice_{methodAndW
37 matches
Mail list logo
