On 11/7/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'll publish it later tonight as 2.0-r468346-SNAPSHOT, and change the
dependencies in the Shale and Struts builds.
This is done. If you want to use the October 27th r468346 snapshot,
use this dependency:
org.apache.struts.
On 11/7/06, tm jee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've go ahead make the following changes on struts2-archetype-starter :-
Thanks!
--
Wendy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROT
Hi guys,
I've go ahead make the following changes on struts2-archetype-starter :-
- make web.xml 2.4 compatible instead of 2.3 (removed the taglib portion and
add the appripriate 2.4 web-app tag)
- corrected the unused 'home.html' link
> The next question is, where are Sitemesh tags used at
>
On 11/7/06, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think that r465598 is the revision you need, after that David started
with his work and he is currently revolutionizing the code.
It turns out to be r468346 from October 27th. Right after that, David
brought the Struts 2 code up to the
On 11/7/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, they are. I haven't used a in my web.xml in years. ;-)
It is needed by some 2.3 containers, but shouldn't be needed according
to the spec.
Me, neither. :) The next question is, where are Sitemesh tags used at
all in that archetype?
Th
On 11/7/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The starter archetype declares a dependency on servlet-api 2.4, but
web.xml uses the 2.3 DTD.
If I switch web.xml to the 2.4 schema, then the elements are
not allowed. (Come to think of it, why are they there for 2.3?
Aren't the sitemesh tlds
The starter archetype declares a dependency on servlet-api 2.4, but
web.xml uses the 2.3 DTD.
If I switch web.xml to the 2.4 schema, then the elements are
not allowed. (Come to think of it, why are they there for 2.3?
Aren't the sitemesh tlds included in its jar file?)
--
Wendy
--
On 11/6/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bob,
The code donated for the "new API" contains copyright statements for
Google. As of November 1, 2006, it is no longer ASF policy to place
copyright statements in individual source files.
* http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
If th
> There are some open issues left, mostly regarding the
> build and release process with maven.
That being the case, are we removing the "beta" qualifier from this XWork 2
release?
-Ted.
-
Posted via Jive Forums
http://forums.op
Yup, but sometimes the key might be an object or a string, I guess that's the
reason toString() was used.
I think it should be fixed as Ruimo Uno suggested.
rgds
Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You can force freemarker to render
it as a number with "?c" I think.
musachy
tm jee wr
Yup. That's the reason I think its ok to compare they key, just like the patch
(ww-1369) and you suggested. :-)
Ruimo Uno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 2006/11/8, tm jee :
> There's a related jira issue for this as well reported on WebWork.
>
> http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/WW-1369
>
> I don'
2006/11/8, tm jee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
There's a related jira issue for this as well reported on WebWork.
http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/WW-1369
I don't think there's an issue comparing the key. What do others think about
it? But for rendering the page, we should use the string cause free
Wendy Smoak ha scritto:
If someone can identify a revision number prior to the beginning of
the last set of changes, I'll check that out and publish a 'fixed'
snapshot from it.
I think that r465598 is the revision you need, after that David started
with his work and he is currently revolutioni
You can force freemarker to render it as a number with "?c" I think.
musachy
tm jee wrote:
There's a related jira issue for this as well reported on WebWork.
http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/WW-1369
I don't think there's an issue comparing the key. What do others think about
it? But for
makes more sense to publish one when a series of changes is complete.
The version is set in the tiles-parent pom (the one in
struts/sandbox/tiles/pom.xml).
If you change the version to something like 2.0-r12345-SNAPSHOT or
2.0-20061107-SNAPSHOT and 'mvn deploy' it, then other projec
There's a related jira issue for this as well reported on WebWork.
http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/WW-1369
I don't think there's an issue comparing the key. What do others think about
it? But for rendering the page, we should use the string cause freemarker will
added locale specific infor
Okie dokie Rainer.
I'll have a go at it, this weekend and comming weekends as well.
rgds
Rainer Hermanns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Toby,
have a look at OS Jira for XWork2...
There are some open issues left, mostly regarding the build and release
process with maven.
I plan to work on these
Toby,
have a look at OS Jira for XWork2...
There are some open issues left, mostly regarding the build and release
process with maven.
I plan to work on these over the coming weekend, but this depends on
current project schedules.
hth,
Rainer
> Hi guys,
>
> What the release plan for xwork2. I t
Hi guys,
What the release plan for xwork2. I think the last time it was discussed, the
main issue holding back the release of xwork2 is the old and outdated docs. I
am working on it for a bit but totally forgotten about it until Pete ask about
the xwork2 release plan in the forum. I could finis
Hi,
Current radiomap.ftl file uses the string representation of map key to
determine if
the radio button should be checked:
<#if tag.contains(parameters.nameValue, itemKeyStr)>
As a result, only String type of property can be used for the radio tag.
In select.ftl file, it uses the map key itse
Hi friends
i would like to explain the situation first
i am working for college application...in that
if user clicks on view,i am displaying data (for this action normal
ActionForm). In that user may click on modify button,where i am transforing
to modify page(for this action also i am using
21 matches
Mail list logo
