Re: Value Stack Question

2006-11-17 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 11/17/06, Mark Menard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is there a means of examining the value stack. I have a very strange situation where OGNL in my JSP is returning a value from com.opensymphony.xwork2.ActionContext.parameters on the stack, even though I have a property with the name on my actio

Re: [s2] Dispatcher

2006-11-17 Thread Don Brown
+1 Good catch. :) Don tm jee wrote: Hi guys, Currently, Dispatcher allows ConfigurationManager to be set through a setter method, however a new ConfigurationManager is being created when Dispatcher constructor is called, resulting in the the setter method being functionless. I think we sho

Re: Value Stack Question

2006-11-17 Thread tm jee
Hi Mark, By doing valueStack.getContext(); we get the valueStack's context (a Map) whose value with "someKey" as its key is accessible through <@s.property value="%{#someKey}" /> There's a root in the value stack as well, valueStack.getRoot(); which is like a stack, I think that's where t

Re: [SHORT-TERM PLAN] - User/Dev Site Refactoring

2006-11-17 Thread Ted Husted
There's an obsolete redirect in there that's confusing the links. I had deleted the file from the staging area, but evidentally, it still resides on the production server. I put in a blank .htaccess to try and clear it, but it will be a few minutes before the site refreshes again. -Ted. On 11/17

Re: [SHORT-TERM PLAN] - User/Dev Site Refactoring

2006-11-17 Thread Mark Menard
On 11/17/06 8:32 PM, "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK I'm done for now. The big changes to date were > > * Separating mail into mail and dev-mail, and downloads into downloads > and builds. > * Moving the links for the prior releases to the downloads (Releases) page. > * Keeping 1.3.5

Re: [SHORT-TERM PLAN] - User/Dev Site Refactoring

2006-11-17 Thread Ted Husted
OK I'm done for now. The big changes to date were * Separating mail into mail and dev-mail, and downloads into downloads and builds. * Moving the links for the prior releases to the downloads (Releases) page. * Keeping 1.3.5 on the main menu bar (as it is our only GA right now). * Marking 2.0.x a

Value Stack Question

2006-11-17 Thread Mark Menard
Is there a means of examining the value stack. I have a very strange situation where OGNL in my JSP is returning a value from com.opensymphony.xwork2.ActionContext.parameters on the stack, even though I have a property with the name on my action class. It's almost like OGNL is skipping over the pro

Re: [s2] struts-2.0.dtd

2006-11-17 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 11/17/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: When can we push the new version up to the web site? It should happen whenever the top-level website is published. http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/site/pom.xml has an execution of the antrun plugin that grabs them from the svn urls

Re: [s2] struts-2.0.dtd

2006-11-17 Thread Don Brown
Whenever you're bored? Don James Mitchell wrote: When can we push the new version up to the web site? -- James Mitchell 678.910.8017 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO

[s2] struts-2.0.dtd

2006-11-17 Thread James Mitchell
When can we push the new version up to the web site? -- James Mitchell 678.910.8017 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [tiles2] Servlet 2.3 or 2.4?

2006-11-17 Thread Greg Reddin
On Nov 17, 2006, at 6:30 AM, Antonio Petrelli wrote: * compile against Servlet 2.4, though I think it can be used under Servlet 2.3 environments, declaring the problems with JSP < 2.0 pages (that miss EL); +1. Greg - To

Re: [s2] XWork2 release plan

2006-11-17 Thread Musachy Barroso
I can't find the maven plugin for apt, do you have a link? They do have an AlmostPlainText(apt also) plugin. The tobago project has an apt plugin(looks good): http://myfaces.apache.org/tobago/tobago-tool/maven-apt-plugin/source-repository.html musachy Rene Gielen wrote: Ted, there is a m2 pl

Re: [S2] Where's the site?

2006-11-17 Thread Rainer Hermanns
Already done :) > Rainer, you're the man! > > Though, that's somethign that would not be affected by what I'm doing > now. If you want to go ahead and attach that to the Confluence page, > please do. (If you need karma, let me know.) > > -Ted. > > On 11/17/06, Rainer Hermanns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

Re: [S2] Where's the site?

2006-11-17 Thread Ted Husted
Rainer, you're the man! Though, that's somethign that would not be affected by what I'm doing now. If you want to go ahead and attach that to the Confluence page, please do. (If you need karma, let me know.) -Ted. On 11/17/06, Rainer Hermanns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ted, regarding the site

Re: [S2] Where's the site?

2006-11-17 Thread Rainer Hermanns
Ted, regarding the site update: the updated architecture image might be usefull as well. Just attached it here: http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1480 -Rainer > OK, I'll move it. > > On 11/17/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 11/13/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: [SHORT-TERM PLAN] - User/Dev Site Refactoring

2006-11-17 Thread Mark Menard
On 11/17/06 8:37 AM, "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To make it easier for people to become involved in the Struts > development, or not, I'd like to try to make some navigational changes > to the site so as to clearly distinguish which parts are intended for > "black-box" users and whic

Re: [s2] XWork2 release plan

2006-11-17 Thread Musachy Barroso
Rainer, I just attached a jar to ww-1392, it has the code, and the batch file I was using to test it. 2 things about it, first, I can't get tiger to format the output xml (there is a bug in tiger...6296446there must be a workaround), the second one is that apt has a bug parsing the cmd li

Re: [s2] XWork2 release plan

2006-11-17 Thread Musachy Barroso
I didn't know that, I will check it out. thanks musachy Rene Gielen wrote: Ted, there is a m2 plugin available for apt tasks, we should be on the safe side here. Regards, Rene I don't know if we are actually using Ant itself for anything now. AFAIK, everything is based on Maven 2. Even

Re: [S2] Where's the site?

2006-11-17 Thread Ted Husted
OK, I'll move it. On 11/17/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/13/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was tempted to put the WW folder under 2.x, but this way, it's > easier to switch back and forth between Brutus and the live site. I think it belongs under 2.x. We've s

Re: [S2] Where's the site?

2006-11-17 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 11/13/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I was tempted to put the WW folder under 2.x, but this way, it's easier to switch back and forth between Brutus and the live site. I think it belongs under 2.x. We've said we will host the archived website for GA versions. How is that going

[SHORT-TERM PLAN] - User/Dev Site Refactoring

2006-11-17 Thread Ted Husted
To make it easier for people to become involved in the Struts development, or not, I'd like to try to make some navigational changes to the site so as to clearly distinguish which parts are intended for "black-box" users and which which parts are intended for "bleeding edge" developers. Right now,

Re: [s2] XWork2 release plan

2006-11-17 Thread Rainer Hermanns
Musachy, can you send me over your tld processor stuff? Best would be to attach it to the jira ticket (WW-1392). tia, Rainer > After 2 hours trying to make apt run from ant in a generic way, I found > out that ant 1.7 has an AptTask. I guess I will borrow that class until > struts upgrades to 1.7

[tiles2] Servlet 2.3 or 2.4?

2006-11-17 Thread Antonio Petrelli
Hello! Currently Tiles 2 is compiled againts Servlet 2.3 spec library, but, as an oddity, the test webapp declares to work with Servlet 2.4 and it seems to break it under Linux (I have to verify it, since under Windows there is no problem). So should we: * compile against Servlet 2.4, though I

Re: [s2] XWork2 release plan

2006-11-17 Thread Rene Gielen
Ted, there is a m2 plugin available for apt tasks, we should be on the safe side here. Regards, Rene > I don't know if we are actually using Ant itself for > anything now. > AFAIK, everything is based on Maven 2. Even so, we > don't have any > compunctions about using beta tools to build the >

Re: [s2] XWork2 release plan

2006-11-17 Thread Rainer Hermanns
Ted, ant is still used for the XWork2 CI build at OpenSymphony. It can be removed as soon as we have configured anthill to support maven or switched to something different (TeamCity?) -Rainer > I don't know if we are actually using Ant itself for anything now. > AFAIK, everything is based on Mave

Re: [s2] XWork2 release plan

2006-11-17 Thread Ted Husted
I don't know if we are actually using Ant itself for anything now. AFAIK, everything is based on Maven 2. Even so, we don't have any compunctions about using beta tools to build the framework. -Ted. On 11/16/06, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: After 2 hours trying to make apt run fro

[s2] More line-precise error information

2006-11-17 Thread Don Brown
With the multiple levels of configuration, constant overrides, and bean selection, it can be confusing as to how Struts is configured and how it got there. To assist debugging and provide the ability to continue to provide more line-precise error reporting, I've changed the configuration loadi

Re: [s2] struts-default

2006-11-17 Thread Don Brown
I think you are saying that you refer to keep xwork-default.xml and struts-default.xml in relative sync with regards to xwork beans for XWork standalone users, but don't have Struts actually use xwork-default.xml. If so, I agree. Don tm jee wrote: sorry for poping this again. Any thoughts o

Re: [s2] struts-default

2006-11-17 Thread tm jee
sorry for poping this again. Any thoughts on this? :) tm jee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: forgotten some stuff in previous post. xwork-default.xml wouldn't be loaded is we are using Struts2, just that with this approach there's 2 files to maintain whenever we introduce new beans etc. (one in str

Re: [s2] BeanSelectionProvider

2006-11-17 Thread tm jee
Ok. thx :) Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Do an svn update...I just fixed that bug 30 minutes ago :) Don tm jee wrote: > Hi guys, > > There's some part I don't understand, would be glad if anyone could help me > understand it better. > > In Dispatcher, during init (in init() method),.

Printer Anywhere (Beta) Free Download

2006-11-17 Thread efraim
PrinterAnywhere has just come out with a no-brainer of a product that I think will turn out to be quite useful, and best of all, it’s free! PrinterAnywhere lets you share your printer with someone else, or vice versa across the internet! Instead of sending someone an attachment of a contract,

Re: [s2] BeanSelectionProvider

2006-11-17 Thread Don Brown
Do an svn update...I just fixed that bug 30 minutes ago :) Don tm jee wrote: Hi guys, There's some part I don't understand, would be glad if anyone could help me understand it better. In Dispatcher, during init (in init() method),. BeanSelectionProvider is being added twice to ConfigurationM

[s2] BeanSelectionProvider

2006-11-17 Thread tm jee
Hi guys, There's some part I don't understand, would be glad if anyone could help me understand it better. In Dispatcher, during init (in init() method),. BeanSelectionProvider is being added twice to ConfigurationManager, once during loading config from classloader (zero configuration) and

Re: [jira] Commented: (WW-680) PropertyTag should not escape by default

2006-11-17 Thread Don Brown
I also modified the notification scheme to remove the reporter of a ticket. Will add him back in a few minutes. Don Antonio Petrelli (JIRA) wrote: [ http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-680?page=comments#action_38755 ] Antonio Petrelli commented on WW-680: -