On 1/18/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm still banging the rocks together when it comes to Maven, and I
don't know what command to use to install the plugin trunk.
For the record:
svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/trunk/maven-gpg-plugin/
cd maven-gpg-plugin
m
Any chance of getting this minor, but really annoying thing in:
https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1602 ?
musachy
Don Brown wrote:
Nope, and it would be a good thing as I fixed the portlet example and
a few other minor bugs.
Don
Ted Husted wrote:
I forgot that we needed to sign the
Nope, and it would be a good thing as I fixed the portlet example and a
few other minor bugs.
Don
Ted Husted wrote:
I forgot that we needed to sign the Maven artificats separately before
the deploy step.
I haven't been able to get the other signing scripts to work, but
Wendy's new release gop
I forgot that we needed to sign the Maven artificats separately before
the deploy step.
I haven't been able to get the other signing scripts to work, but
Wendy's new release gopal does seem to be doing the job for me.
Problem is, the new goal was checked in after the 2.0.3 tag. The
simplest thin
I found that copying the WARs and JARs got past the error, and it
seems to have signed the WARs too.
Wendy, I'm deploying the maven artifacts again as a test. Could you
look at them and tell me if they seem all right?
-Ted.
On 1/18/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/18/07, Rahul Ak
On 1/18/07, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ran into the same bit recently, had to dig into code. 1.0-alpha-1 of
the plugin has a bug (or more correctly, is incomplete) in that the
packaging is hard-coded to "jar" ;-) To work around that, mvn install
the plugin trunk.
Could you be more
I'm finally settling in at my new job and now have approval to work on
S2, XWork, and WebWork. (Not that my meager bug fixes and
contributions are revolutionary but they seem to keep Rainer busy.)
Cheers,
Eric
On 1/18/07, Bob Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/18/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTE
On 1/18/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(And hopefully some of those will
lend us a hand. Even with the merge, we still don't have more active
committers than we had a year ago.)
Sorry, Ted--I really should contribute more. I've been investing a lot of
time in Guice.
Bob
We've been running WebWork 2 in quite a few production applications for a
couple years and have seen no related performance problems. And we're very
particular about performance. I wouldn't worry about it.
Bob
On 1/17/07, Shekhar Yadav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there a plan on when the per
On 1/18/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I updated my local copy to the revision 497046, where we added the
release profile to Struts 2. When I ran from Cygwin
$ mvn -P release -Dpassphrase="***"
It ran fine against the core and api packages. When I tried again with
$ mvn -P all,relea
I updated my local copy to the revision 497046, where we added the
release profile to Struts 2. When I ran from Cygwin
$ mvn -P release -Dpassphrase="***"
It ran fine against the core and api packages. When I tried again with
$ mvn -P all,release -Dpassphrase="***"
It ran fine for awhile, but
OK, I've got 45 minutes before work, and I'll give the GnuPG thing a quick try.
On 1/17/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/17/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks, Wendy. Seems to have worked like a charm.
Great!
Then it looks like the only thing missing is signatur
One of the possibilities I was discussing with Phil yesterday was to
implement freemarker caching on the WW side of things--just like we do
with OGNL. In WW if we're not in devMode, then I think its safe to say
that we can read the template once and never reread it. This would
eliminate the n
Even though this is for WW, almost all of it is applicable to Struts 2.
This is a key phrase. There are a lot of very successful WW
deployments out there, with the same performance levels.
We really need to setup our own benchmarks, so that we can run them
with the templates deployed. I'd love
I've been playing with Struts 2 and portlets lately, so I took the time
to create a couple of simple portlet archetypes to make it easier to
start a Struts 2 portlet. The short of it is I'm very pleased with how
easy it is to create a portlet, especially when combined with the
codebehind plugi
15 matches
Mail list logo
