On 1/27/07, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At the risk of complicating things, isn't bad form, if nothing else, to cut
a release based on a transient repository location? One of the reasons to
use Maven is to have a reproducible build, and a release is the kind of
build which is more l
On 1/26/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The release manager for Struts 2.0.4 will need to add a profile to
settings.xml so that Maven can find the struts-annotations jar:
[untested]
...
struts-annotations-101-staging
struts-an
Oops, the numbers aren't quite as bad as I thought. The original
numbers included the cost of compiling the OGNL expression. If you
exclude the OGNL compilation the numbers are:
Using OGNL expression: 15 ms
Explicitly calling getText: 0 ms
I knew that compiling the OGNL expression took a lon
That said, I'm not sure if I messed up something here :)
Since struts(2)-blank-archetype is for setting up struts based apps,
there is no need for providing LICENSE and NOTICE files.
struts2-blank-plugin contains these files, which is fine then.
- Rene
Rene Gielen schrieb:
> The annotations modu
The annotations module was setup from struts-archetype-blank, so I
wonder if we should to add LICENSE and NOTICE files to the archetype to
avoid such issues in future...
- Rene
Don Brown schrieb:
> I don't understand - all of the Struts jars are missing those files.
> The only place I see it add
