Henri,
Check the DTD version of the Faces example. The 1.3 should contain
cancellable only while 1.2 must have it as a element.
Paul
Henri Yandell wrote:
The list of issues for 1.3.7 look good. I can't find your PGP key, so
I'm unable to check the .asc file.
The src in the -all zip happil
The list of issues for 1.3.7 look good. I can't find your PGP key, so
I'm unable to check the .asc file.
The src in the -all zip happily packages into jars.
Installing the apps into a Tomcat 5.5, I get the following error for
struts-faces-example2-1.3.7:
SEVERE: Parse Error at line 146 column
On 2/27/07, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But... we'll miss the fisticuffs.
Not if you sign up for the Guice mailing list. :)
Konstantin, you're more than welcome to try peddling Pico on our list. ;)
Bob
But... we'll miss the fisticuffs.
--- Bob Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You're right. Sorry for the noise.
>
> On 2/27/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Perhaps a better venue for this discussion would
> be the Guide
> > developers mailing list.
> >
> > * http://groups.google.
You're right. Sorry for the noise.
On 2/27/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Perhaps a better venue for this discussion would be the Guide
developers mailing list.
* http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice
-Ted.
On 2/27/07, Konstantin Priblouda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Pico approach at least leaves your managed classes
alone.
Right, and Guice supports both approaches (the external approach via custom
providers which are roughly equivalent to Pico's external configuration).
Strictly speaking, pico
Perhaps a better venue for this discussion would be the Guide
developers mailing list.
* http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice
-Ted.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROT
--- Bob Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/26/07, Konstantin Priblouda
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > U, strictly speaking, that's still code. ;)
> >
> > Strictly speaking yes. But it is externalized and
> > does not impose anything on used classes.
>
>
> It imposes something on
On 2/26/07, Konstantin Priblouda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> U, strictly speaking, that's still code. ;)
Strictly speaking yes. But it is externalized and
does not impose anything on used classes.
It imposes something on me, the programmer.
What if I like to use another session impl
Sorry about replying to my own post - I was in a hurry, and didn't
completely read the message. I'm not sure, but I don't think the
javascript should be included in the simple theme - I'm quite
surprised it's even there.
Also, your question is absolutely in place on the dev list. Apologies.
Phil
10 matches
Mail list logo
