On 8/7/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes we ship both in the validator jar - perhaps should follow up with
> Wicket to see if they found an accomodation. I can't believe that the
> ASF can't come up with a one line solution for javascript files -
> something along the lines "This
On 8/7/07, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> *sigh* Sometimes the ASF overhead can be such a pain... The headers
> are fine when you use an IDE, but when you use vi, it means scrolling
> down the 50 or whatever lines every time, which is so annoying.
>
> I like the compressing idea, but it do
*sigh* Sometimes the ASF overhead can be such a pain... The headers
are fine when you use an IDE, but when you use vi, it means scrolling
down the 50 or whatever lines every time, which is so annoying.
I like the compressing idea, but it does make development harder,
particularly if you use somet
On 8/7/07, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it absolutely necessary for that huge license header to go on every
> single file? It is rather annoying to scroll through all this license
> text just for a couple-line config file. I'm also concerned it bloats
> the Javascript and CSS unneces
I agree, please remove it.
--
James Mitchell
On Aug 6, 2007, at 8:04 PM, Don Brown wrote:
Is it absolutely necessary for that huge license header to go on every
single file? It is rather annoying to scroll through all this license
text just for a couple-line config file. I'm also concerne
Is it absolutely necessary for that huge license header to go on every
single file? It is rather annoying to scroll through all this license
text just for a couple-line config file. I'm also concerned it bloats
the Javascript and CSS unnecessarily.
Don
On 8/7/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROT
