Remember the POM controls the JDK target. So it won't hurt you.
On Dec 11, 2007 3:12 PM, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, December 11, 2007 4:05 pm, Paul Benedict wrote:
> > Frank, why not install JDK 5 to do the install? You don't need JDK 5 to
> > run
> > Struts, just to b
On Tue, December 11, 2007 4:05 pm, Paul Benedict wrote:
> Frank, why not install JDK 5 to do the install? You don't need JDK 5 to
> run
> Struts, just to build it.
I can do that (I have a batch file that flips me to JDK6, so easy enough),
but then I have to exercise some care to ensure I don't use
Frank, why not install JDK 5 to do the install? You don't need JDK 5 to run
Struts, just to build it.
On Dec 11, 2007 2:50 PM, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, December 7, 2007 2:54 am, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
> > 2007/12/7, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>
> >> P
On Fri, December 7, 2007 2:54 am, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
> 2007/12/7, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> Paul Benedict wrote:
>> > Please try again.
>> [INFO] Building Struts - Tiles 2 integration
>> ...
>>
>> [ERRO
Please ask questions regarding the use of Struts on the struts-user mailing
list; the struts-dev list is for discussing the development of Struts itself.
Thanks,
Dave
--- piterskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi, everyone!
>
> If anyone can assist me, please let me know.
>
> There may be a
Hi, everyone!
If anyone can assist me, please let me know.
There may be a simple solution to this, or it is just some sort of error I
have, but I cannot firure it out for a while now.
Everything seems to be fine.
I have jsp page, I have a struts form. I have action class.
Jsp has form that wi
Hmmm, I'd say that it's still a safe bet that Hibernate Validator will
have a "profound effect" on JSR 303, akin to JPA and Hibernate Core.
I've seen posts on the Hibernate list that imply JSR 303 will be
backwardly compatible with HV.
-Ted.
On Dec 10, 2007 4:37 PM, Bob Tiernay <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On 12/11/07, Brian Pontarelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At first I thought this might be a problem because SmartURLs was
> sub-classing the ActionConfig object in order to add some additional
> information for performance reasons. However, I have a feeling that I
> can remove the sub-class. All
