Re: RES: Destroy Of Interceptor

2007-12-17 Thread Dave Newton
--- Décio Heinzelmann Luckow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How can I procede? Patches can always be attached to JIRA tickets. d. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RES: Destroy Of Interceptor

2007-12-17 Thread Décio Heinzelmann Luckow
Cool, Can I collaborate with struts and do this correction? I was reading the page 'http://struts.apache.org/dev/builds.html' to get the information about struts subversion repository. Could I send the correction by some way? Sure, I don´t have the write permission. How can I procede? Decio H

Re: web-beans ?

2007-12-17 Thread Antonio Petrelli
2007/12/17, Brian Pontarelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > One thing I noticed that I thought might be a good idea for session > safety was to move the flash Map from the session to the request on the > first usage of that scope. That way the flash is not there any longer, > in case of failures. Th

Re: web-beans ?

2007-12-17 Thread Brian Pontarelli
One thing I noticed that I thought might be a good idea for session safety was to move the flash Map from the session to the request on the first usage of that scope. That way the flash is not there any longer, in case of failures. -bp Tom Schneider wrote: Actually, we've done a little mor

Re: [s2] Assembly build (was svn commit: r604801 )

2007-12-17 Thread Don Brown
On 12/17/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2007/12/17, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hmm...this is kinda a bigger issue - should our assembly contain all > > the files for the frameworks that the plugin provides support for? We > > don't include every Spring jar or a JSF frame

Re: [s2] Assembly build (was svn commit: r604801 )

2007-12-17 Thread Antonio Petrelli
2007/12/17, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 12/17/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The Struts 2/Tiles 2 plugin does not depend on tiles-jsp, so I suppose > that > > it isn't there... > > Hmm...this is kinda a bigger issue - should our assembly contain all > the files for th

[s2] Assembly build (was svn commit: r604801 )

2007-12-17 Thread Don Brown
On 12/17/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Struts 2/Tiles 2 plugin does not depend on tiles-jsp, so I suppose that > it isn't there... Hmm...this is kinda a bigger issue - should our assembly contain all the files for the frameworks that the plugin provides support for? We don

Re: svn commit: r604801 - in /struts/struts2/trunk/assembly: pom.xml src/main/assembly/all.xml src/main/assembly/lib-backport.xml src/main/assembly/lib-jdk14.xml src/main/assembly/lib.xml

2007-12-17 Thread Antonio Petrelli
2007/12/17, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 12/17/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Mmm I think that you removed Tiles for no good reason > > Nope, I just checked - Tiles is still there in -all, -lib, and > -lib-jdk14. You don't need to specify the jar explicitly, as it

Re: svn commit: r604801 - in /struts/struts2/trunk/assembly: pom.xml src/main/assembly/all.xml src/main/assembly/lib-backport.xml src/main/assembly/lib-jdk14.xml src/main/assembly/lib.xml

2007-12-17 Thread Don Brown
On 12/17/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mmm I think that you removed Tiles for no good reason Nope, I just checked - Tiles is still there in -all, -lib, and -lib-jdk14. You don't need to specify the jar explicitly, as it is pulled in via the tiles plugin. One of the advant

Re: svn commit: r604801 - in /struts/struts2/trunk/assembly: pom.xml src/main/assembly/all.xml src/main/assembly/lib-backport.xml src/main/assembly/lib-jdk14.xml src/main/assembly/lib.xml

2007-12-17 Thread Antonio Petrelli
2007/12/17, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 12/17/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Don, > > Why did you remove so many dependencies? I think that your commit broke > the > > assemblies instead of fixing them... > > Most of those were not used anymore, but I'm sure I'll have

Re: svn commit: r604801 - in /struts/struts2/trunk/assembly: pom.xml src/main/assembly/all.xml src/main/assembly/lib-backport.xml src/main/assembly/lib-jdk14.xml src/main/assembly/lib.xml

2007-12-17 Thread Don Brown
On 12/17/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Don, > Why did you remove so many dependencies? I think that your commit broke the > assemblies instead of fixing them... Most of those were not used anymore, but I'm sure I'll have to put back in. I'd rather know exactly what needs to go

Re: [s2] Build changes

2007-12-17 Thread Don Brown
Ok, I believe I have the first cut at the assembly builds. They were very out of date, and didn't include all the jdk14 jars, particularly for plugins. I'm sure there are more jars we should be bundling, so take a look. As far as I can tell, the steps go: mvn -Pall,j4,alljars clean install cd as

Re: svn commit: r604801 - in /struts/struts2/trunk/assembly: pom.xml src/main/assembly/all.xml src/main/assembly/lib-backport.xml src/main/assembly/lib-jdk14.xml src/main/assembly/lib.xml

2007-12-17 Thread Antonio Petrelli
Don, Why did you remove so many dependencies? I think that your commit broke the assemblies instead of fixing them... And why did you change the backported artifacts classifier to jdk14? I think that the name was chosen by Ted (Husted) for a good reason (I suppose :-) ). Ciao Antonio 2007/12/17,

Re: [s2] Build changes

2007-12-17 Thread Antonio Petrelli
2007/12/17, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Yep, if you look in the OpenSymphony maven 2 repository, you'll see > the -jdk14 jar. I closed the ticket accordingly. Well, thank you :-) Ciao Antonio