Wendy Smoak wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 7:57 PM, Jeromy Evans
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd hoped to perform a dry-run myself but don't see how I can do that
without committing via mvn release:prepare.
What do you mean by dry run? The release:prepare goal has a
-DdryRun=true pa
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 7:57 PM, Jeromy Evans
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd hoped to perform a dry-run myself but don't see how I can do that
> without committing via mvn release:prepare.
What do you mean by dry run? The release:prepare goal has a
-DdryRun=true parameter... but AFAIK Struts
I'm available to perform a good chunk of testing.
Ted, if you do it can you keep some notes on the tasks you perform? Or
is there anything with more detail than [1] or a previously used release
plan for 2.x?
I'd hoped to perform a dry-run myself but don't see how I can do that
without committi
Hey there,
I am working on the open issues for xwork 2.1.1 over the weekend,
so that the release could be out on monday.
Since lots of fixes and changes were done affecting S2.1 core
features, testing S2.1 with latest xwork snapshots would help to get
both codebases stablelized.
Please report xwo
I will help testing it (I don't have any application on production
tho). Ted if you could do it, it would be great, I think it is about
time we get a build out there.
regards
musachy
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 6:38 AM, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there much to do beside tag it, build
Is there much to do beside tag it, build it, and sign it? I could help
with that much, so long as other people are testing it.
-Ted.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 5:35 AM, Pedro Herrera
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> good question . . .
>
> Musachy Barroso wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Any news
good question . . .
Musachy Barroso wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Any news on the 2.1 build? Is anyone looking into it?
>
> regards
> musachy
>
> --
> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>
> -
> To unsubs
