Re: Dojo plugin update using 1.1.0 framework

> How deep are the client-side tests for the Dojo components? My impression was > that a fair amount had changed moving from Dojo 0.4mumble -> 1.0. > Pretty much the whole thing changed, as far as I know. musachy - To unsubscri

Re: Dojo plugin update using 1.1.0 framework

This point is clear to me,but ,why don´t you leave a only the jar available instead the all structure (.pom, src, etc) because is not working with mvn. thanks Herrera Al Sutton wrote: > > It's a download URL for a zip file, not a maven repository. > > I don't want people to confuse it with

RE: Dojo plugin update using 1.1.0 framework

How deep are the client-side tests for the Dojo components? My impression was that a fair amount had changed moving from Dojo 0.4mumble -> 1.0. I don't know the nature of all the changes that were made, but it makes me nervous. Musachy might have a better handle on this. Dave --- "Karr, David" <

RE: Dojo plugin update using 1.1.0 framework

Is it appropriate at this point to submit a bug for this, and provide a patch for your changes? > -Original Message- > From: Al Sutton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 11:18 PM > To: dev@struts.apache.org > Subject: Dojo plugin update using 1.1.0 framework > >

Re: 2.1 build

probably worth it. Otherwise people should org.apache.struts struts2-core . freemarker

Re: Dojo plugin update using 1.1.0 framework

It's a download URL for a zip file, not a maven repository. I don't want people to confuse it with the official S2.1 dojo plugin. Al. - Original Message - From: "Pedro Herrera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 2:19 PM Subject: Re: Dojo plugin update using 1.1.0 fr

Re: Struts 2 support on JBuilder 2008

I'm not sure if there's specific support for Struts 2, but I do know there's support for building applications using AppFuse. I've visited CodeGear's offices and seen the demo's - it's really cool stuff. Matt On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 12:19 AM, Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The only stuff I

Re: 2.1 build

Ted Husted wrote: Yes, it is something we should do first. It's on the list, but I usually forget about it until the last minute ... :) Are you setup to digitally sign the releases, Jeromy? I've started working my way through it now. I'll have to come back to it tomorrow as it's too late

Re: Dojo plugin update using 1.1.0 framework

is the source correct (http://www.alsutton.com/dojo_1_1_0_for_2_1_1.zip); I cant execute mvn package command. - java.lang.RuntimeException: java.io.FileNotFoundException: C:\Temp\struts_dojo1.1\dojo\..\..\core\src\site\resources\tags\ajax\a.html Herrera Al Sutton wrote: >

Re: 2.1 build

Am Donnerstag, 3. April 2008 17:58:41 schrieb Brian Pontarelli: > Yeah, I was hoping to have time to get the convention plugin into the > main repository, but I just haven't had anytime at all. It will have to > wait until 2.2 unless someone else wants to move it over. At this point > I can't even

Re: 2.1 build

Yes, it is something we should do first. It's on the list, but I usually forget about it until the last minute ... :) Are you setup to digitally sign the releases, Jeromy? It's the one-time section of Creating and Signing a Distributiob * http://struts.apache.org/2.0.11.1/docs/creating-and-sig

Re: 2.1 build

As a side note there is a new freemarker version out (2.3.12, changenotes at http://www.freemarker.org/docs/versions_2_3_12.html), is it worth bumping the version in the core pom? Al. - Original Message - From: "Jeromy Evans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers List" Sent: Fri

Re: 2.1 build

Is the release of struts-annotations-1.0.3 a blocker? It's not in central yet. struts-annotations dependencies: ./core/pom.xml:425: 1.0.3-20080216.121126-3 ./plugins/dojo/pom.xml:261: 1.0.3-20080123.123514-2 ../maven/struts-annotations/pom.xml: 1.0.4-SNAPSHOT Jeromy Evans wrote: Ted, I tr

Re: 2.1 build

I had a miror configured (http://mirrors.dotsrc.org/maven2). I've passed that hiccup using the central repository. Rainer Hermanns wrote: Jeromy, that's strange... XWork 2.1.1 jars are all available from the central repository. See here: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/opensymphony/xwork/2.

Re: 2.1 build

2008/4/4, Jeromy Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Ted, I tried to get you started with a dryRun of release:prepare but I'm > still missing xwork.jar:2.1.1. The mvn output is at > http://people.apache.org/~jeromy/buildlog1.txt This is strange, the

Re: 2.1 build

Jeromy, that's strange... XWork 2.1.1 jars are all available from the central repository. See here: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/opensymphony/xwork/2.1.1/ cheers, Rainer > Ted, I tried to get you started with a dryRun of release:prepare but I'm > still missing xwork.jar:2.1.1. The mvn outp

Re: 2.1 build

Ted, I tried to get you started with a dryRun of release:prepare but I'm still missing xwork.jar:2.1.1. The mvn output is at http://people.apache.org/~jeromy/buildlog1.txt Other details: * JIRA: No open issues except the omnibus ticket (https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2421) * Rel