I spent several hours migrating applications to Struts2.1.1 today. I've
applied a significant overhaul to the migration guide [1].
Summary of results:
core: no new issues encountered after following the migration guide
tiles 2 plugin: no new issues encountered after following migration guide
sit
Whoops, that should be:
http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-211.html
Don
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Jeromy Evans
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don Brown wrote:
>
> >
> > The test build of Struts 2.1.1 is available.
> >
> >
> >
> > Release notes:
> > * http://struts.apache.org/2
Don Brown wrote:
The test build of Struts 2.1.1 is available.
Release notes:
* http://struts.apache.org/2.0.11.1/docs/version-notes-211.html
Any idea why this published Version 6 of the release notes dated 19 Feb
08 instead of Version 11 that was current at 17 Apr 08?
Note the incorrect
2008/4/18, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi all
> Since the license headers are an annoying problem, I wish to add the
> Maven License plugin:
> http://code.google.com/p/maven-license-plugin/
> This plugin can *add* license headers on top of files *automatically*
Sorry, I changed my
Make that the most recent version that is over a year old (I was looking at
the 1.3.9 beta release date), so we've been telling S1 users to go with
1.3.9 for over a year, but we're now saying "Well if you did do it then
you're stuffed if you want to use the most recent S2 as well".. not a
g
Dave,
The problem is that the S1 plugin does work with older versions of S1, just
not the most recent one, so it's more like if you have a video playing iPod,
and it's not the most recent one, then you're OK.
My problem is really that the whole point of the S1 plugin is to allow S1
code to w
Disregard that post.
Sorry.
Matt
matt.payne wrote:
>
> My build is getting xwork 2.0.4.
>
> This should pull xwork 2.1.x right?
>
>
> -->2008-04-18 10:51:15.033::WARN: failed action2-cleanup
> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
> com/opensymphony/xwork2/util/logging/LoggerFacto
> ry
>
My build is getting xwork 2.0.4.
This should pull xwork 2.1.x right?
-->2008-04-18 10:51:15.033::WARN: failed action2-cleanup
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
com/opensymphony/xwork2/util/logging/LoggerFacto
ry
at
org.apache.struts2.dispatcher.ActionContextCleanUp.(ActionCon
textClean
--- Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I see it this would be like Apple making and releasing a new Speaker
> System today that wouldn't work with the iPod touch, or Microsoft releasing
> a new version of Office which isn't compatible with Vista,
It'd be more like an iPod speaker system t
From: Dave Newton
> Please post this to the struts-user list.
>
> Dave
I should have been more clear... I'm not looking for support, just
reporting a problem with the 2.1.1 build. The error I'm seeing is a
result of using the 2.1.1 build using websphere while noting that I
haven't had issues usi
2008/4/18, Jeromy Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I may be guilty of forgetting to add the license header as I always
> automatically collapse them.
No problem :-)
If not this plugin, it would be helpful if there was an svn hook (eg. commit
> failed due to missing license), otherwise to have a l
Antonio Petrelli wrote:
Hi all
Since the license headers are an annoying problem, I wish to add the
Maven License plugin:
http://code.google.com/p/maven-license-plugin/
This plugin can *add* license headers on top of files *automatically*
Thoughts?
I may be guilty of forgetting to add the
Giovanni,
Like you I am a pure 2.x developer these days, and I would have absolutely
no problem with the S1 plugin being spun off into a separate project, but as
things are I couldn't vote for it being anything more than a test build
because we are shipping something we know doesn't work with
Hi Al,
For me as a pure 2.x user I find the fact that 2.1.1 would be hold back
only as an alpha just because of supporting a backward-compatibility S1
plugin is a huge pity to say the least :)
As a Struts user I personally would expect S1 plugin to have its own
release cycle away from the S2
Hi Don,
I am also testing the 2.1.1 here ... many thanks for pushing the build.
I could not find the dojo plugin in:
http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.1/struts-2.1.1-lib.zip
Then I took it from:
http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.1/m2-staging-repository/org/apache/struts/struts
2008/4/18, Giovanni Azua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Ciao Antonio,
>
> Antonio Petrelli wrote:
>
> > In fact the problem is with *old* files :-(
> >
> >
> Then an alternative way would be using find/sed once and having the coding
> style xml config for new files.
It's really hard to fix 600+ files
Ciao Antonio,
Antonio Petrelli wrote:
In fact the problem is with *old* files :-(
Then an alternative way would be using find/sed once and having the
coding style xml config for new files. I personally find that the
perfect combination is coding std xml config + jalopy + checkstyle
becaus
2008/4/18, Giovanni Azua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> hi Antonio,
>
> Using Eclipse => Preferences -> Java -> Code Style -> Code Template ->
> Comments -> Files
>
> you can set a license header and it will be automatically applied to every
> new file.
In fact the problem is with *old* files :-(
Be
hi Antonio,
Using Eclipse => Preferences -> Java -> Code Style -> Code Template ->
Comments -> Files
you can set a license header and it will be automatically applied to
every new file. Better yet, you can define a Struts coding standards xml
configuration that any developer can import into
Hi all
Since the license headers are an annoying problem, I wish to add the
Maven License plugin:
http://code.google.com/p/maven-license-plugin/
This plugin can *add* license headers on top of files *automatically*
Thoughts?
Antonio
---
20 matches
Mail list logo