Please ask this question to the Struts Users mailing list:
http://struts.apache.org/mail.html
Ciao
Antonio
2008/5/27 Andrea Vettori [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I have a login interceptor that checks the presence of a token in the
session. If the token is not present it returns LOGIN; if present
ooops
sorry !
Il giorno 27/mag/08, alle ore 08:56, Antonio Petrelli ha scritto:
Please ask this question to the Struts Users mailing list:
http://struts.apache.org/mail.html
Ciao
Antonio
2008/5/27 Andrea Vettori [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I have a login interceptor that checks the presence
Frans Thamura wrote:
hi alll
for S2 2.1.2, which will become beta
do this release make the JSON Plugins will be bundled and any idea for
JSON Plugins?
The JSON Plugin is an external project and I don't think there has been
any discussion of bringing it into Struts. I'm afraid I don't
khalod85 wrote:
I've an application the first module is implemented by STRUTS and the second
module needs to be implemented by JSF I'm working with myEclipse as my IDE
and JBoss as a web server when I added the JSF capabilities to my project
and tried to launch the web application I noticed that
The plugin will scan the entire classpath, but that's not to large of an
issue and pretty fast (considering). The issue is when it starts loading
classes into the perm space to determine if the class is in fact an
Action or not. This is the part where your perm space can become full
and then
The plugin will scan the entire classpath, but that's not to large of an
issue and pretty fast (considering). The issue is when it starts loading
classes into the perm space to determine if the class is in fact an Action
or not. This is the part where your perm space can become full and then
The scanning doesn't have anything to do with the location of the JSP files.
It is entirely based on the set of package locators and exclude packages. It
uses the classpath scanning mechanism that simply opens all the JAR files
and looks at them. It only loads a class into the JVM if it is in
I've tried also with tomcat and oc4j the same thing happend so i don't think
it's about jboss or something but it's related to the request processor btw
thanks 4 help and quick reply;
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/STRUTS-with-JSF-tp17483553p17491010.html
Sent from the
You are right and I am confused with another problem, if your action is:
action -actions.MyCoolAction (@ResultPath(/))
result - /my-cool.ftl
what you get is a bunch of (with different jars)
SEVERE: Unable to scan [C:\Program
Files\apache-tomcat-6.0.16\lib\catalina.jar] for resources
Hmm...this should really be another thread, but there is a much better
solution for classpath scanning - xbean-finder. It is a small library
used by OpenEJB and Geronimo, three classes, that scans the classpath,
but uses a technique that doesn't require the class to be loaded into
memory. As a
Does this vote have a conclusion? Does the discussion merit a wiki page so
we can keep this thread for the vote itself?
Paul
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Musachy Barroso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are right and I am confused with another problem, if your action is:
action -
The blockers were:
1. Support REST
2. Support Codebehind
We agreed on #1, and it should be working (more testing would be
nice). We haven't got to an agreement on #2 yet.
musachy
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Paul Benedict [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this vote have a conclusion? Does the
I will check it out. Is this something that another plugin could use
or core itself?
musachy
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 7:24 PM, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm...this should really be another thread, but there is a much better
solution for classpath scanning - xbean-finder. It is a small
My vote is we bring the classes into XWork to replace the existing
classpath scanner.
Don
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Musachy Barroso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will check it out. Is this something that another plugin could use
or core itself?
musachy
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 7:24 PM,
It depends on ASM
musachy
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 8:07 PM, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My vote is we bring the classes into XWork to replace the existing
classpath scanner.
Don
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Musachy Barroso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will check it out. Is this
That's not a problem, particularly if we jarjar the dependency in the xwork jar.
Don
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:12 AM, Musachy Barroso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It depends on ASM
musachy
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 8:07 PM, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My vote is we bring the classes into
16 matches
Mail list logo