Re: [s2] 2.1 to 2.5 Roadmap discussions

2008-06-01 Thread Frans Thamura
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 3:10 AM, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sounds good. I think the OSGi plugin could make it to 2.2, and it > would be nice to make a list of things that are missing/wanted to work > on them (one of them is making Convention work with OSGi), I would > work on this

Re: [s2] 2.1 to 2.5 Roadmap discussions

2008-06-01 Thread Musachy Barroso
Sounds good. I think the OSGi plugin could make it to 2.2, and it would be nice to make a list of things that are missing/wanted to work on them (one of them is making Convention work with OSGi), I would work on this. What is "Built-in command line tool like Grails" going to do? Anyway, further b

Re: [s2] Towards a stable 2.1.x release

2008-06-01 Thread Musachy Barroso
+1 I will create a copy of REST and Codebehind into the sandbox with my local changes and keep playing with them. musachy On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 2:25 AM, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > With 2.1.2 beta out the door, I think it is time we consider the > branch feature-complete, which means

Re: [s2] Towards a stable 2.1.x release

2008-06-01 Thread James Holmes
+1 On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 2:25 AM, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > With 2.1.2 beta out the door, I think it is time we consider the > branch feature-complete, which means our focus should now be on > working out the bugs so we can get a stable, GA-quality 2.1.x release > ASAP. > > I'm goi

Re: [s2] 2.1 to 2.5 Roadmap discussions

2008-06-01 Thread Bob Tiernay
In terms of new features, I would like to see the Scope plugin integrated into the core similar to the plan for Convention. This seems like an essential service for a modern mvc framework. However, the plugin as it stands is not feature complete. I believe the following features would make it g

Re: [s2] 2.1 to 2.5 Roadmap discussions

2008-06-01 Thread Al Sutton
Are we dumping pre-1.5 support for 2.1 given that Sun say that 1.4.2 will be EOLed to the general public by the end of October this year? It would be a little wasteful of manpower to support something in the core that the vender says will be dead a few months after we go GA. Don Brown wrote:

Re: [s2] 2.1 to 2.5 Roadmap discussions

2008-06-01 Thread Paul Benedict
I don't like the jump in version numbers of advertisement sake. I'd rather just keep on going with 2.3, etc. In terms of JSR 303, Commons Validator 2 is being worked on for that. On 6/1/08, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Struts 2 desperately needs a public roadmap, IMO, so here's a quick

[s2] 2.1 to 2.5 Roadmap discussions

2008-06-01 Thread Don Brown
Struts 2 desperately needs a public roadmap, IMO, so here's a quick strawman to get the discussion started: Struts 2.1 * New plugins: REST, Dojo, DWR, Portlet, JUnit, and TestNG * Internal API cleanups Struts 2.2 * Finalize zero configuration strategy with new Conventions plugin

Re: [VOTE] Bring Convention plugin into trunk and deprecate Zero Config

2008-06-01 Thread Frans Thamura
anyway, i am not follow the REST feature but i can see the ZeroConfig/CodeBehind/SmartURL/JSON vs current REST is a smiliar but different world anyone can share what should we do for this case? i think this is good for us that investing our time, to know, which one is depreciated and which one