Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.0.11.2 Quality (fast track) - RESULT

2008-06-30 Thread Rene Gielen
+1 GA binding * Rene Gielen * Rainer Hermanns * Musachy Barroso +1 GA supporting * Dave Newton Struts 2.0.11.2 is now rated at GA, and I proceeded to copying the files for mirroring. After veryfing, I'll post the announcement. Regards, Rene

Re: [OT] Re: environment awareness (project stage in JSF)

2008-06-30 Thread Al Sutton
I think we're pretty much done, I do beleive that a configuration should reflect the environment it runs in, but I think our opinions differ when it comes to allowing developers to dictate behavioural changes between environments and shipping code which is never executed. Brian Pontarelli wrot

Re: [OT] Re: environment awareness (project stage in JSF)

2008-06-30 Thread Brian Pontarelli
I think we both agree that configuration is best. In fact I think you even support environment awareness in configuration system. So, from that perspective we are solid. The rest is just debating personal style and developer freedom. I will answer a few things below, but I think we can cl

Re: Classpath leading slash question (codebehind)

2008-06-30 Thread Musachy Barroso
I think that if the resource name starts with a "/", then the class loader will use it as an absolute path (taking the web app root as root). If the resource name is relative, the classloader tries all the entries in the classpath(including jars), as roots, using the resource name as the path. mus

Classpath leading slash question (codebehind)

2008-06-30 Thread Jeromy Evans
The CodebehindUnknownHandler will search for results using: ServletContext.getResource(path); then if not found ClassLoaderUtils.getResource(path, getClass()) The path always has a leading slash which is mandatory for the ServletContext call. However under some(?) conditions ClassLoaderUtils

for review - split content type handler manager in REST plugin

2008-06-30 Thread Jeromy Evans
Could someone with an interest in the REST plugin please glance at the changes I've committed for WW-2641? The change allows a different content-type in the request than the response. This was added specifically to allow a x-www-form-urlencoded request with a response in a different content-t

Re: [OT] Re: environment awareness (project stage in JSF)

2008-06-30 Thread Al Sutton
Brian Pontarelli wrote: I'll reply inline quickly. I'm coming from the other side of the configuration debate; the side that says you should have the configuration file which shows whats happening as opposed to having "intelligent" defaults which hide configuration options from the deployer/s