Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.0.11.2 Quality (fast track) - UPDATE / SERIOUS ISSUE

2008-07-07 Thread Al Sutton
Any chance we can sneek the freemarker update in as well. It seems to be showing improvements to performance in multi-client cases without any negative side effects. Al. Don Brown wrote: 2.0.11.3 sounds fine to me. Are there that many commits on the 2.0.x branch that we aren't ready to relea

Re: Enhancing "stream" type result

2008-07-07 Thread Jeromy Evans
-1 The params of StreamResult are already evaluated. Example: ${contentType} inputStream attachment; filename="${fileName}" ${contentLength} 1024 James Holmes wrote: Seems like a reasonable request to me. The best way to get these types of enhancements incorporated is to open

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.0.11.2 Quality (fast track) - UPDATE / SERIOUS ISSUE

2008-07-07 Thread Don Brown
2.0.11.3 sounds fine to me. Are there that many commits on the 2.0.x branch that we aren't ready to release? Don On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Rene Gielen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Some might have noticed that there was still no official announcement > for 2.0.11.2 availability. Until Satu

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.0.11.2 Quality (fast track) - UPDATE / SERIOUS ISSUE

2008-07-07 Thread Rene Gielen
Some might have noticed that there was still no official announcement for 2.0.11.2 availability. Until Saturday, there was an issue with the gpg signature of the maven artifacts [1], which needed a pom fix [2] and a redeployment of the files to sync with the official maven repositories. Since Satur

Re: Enhancing "stream" type result

2008-07-07 Thread James Holmes
Seems like a reasonable request to me. The best way to get these types of enhancements incorporated is to open up a JIRA ticket and attach a patch file. On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Struts Two <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am using struts 2.0.11.1 and I just realized that you can not > dynam

Enhancing "stream" type result

2008-07-07 Thread Struts Two
I am using struts 2.0.11.1 and I just realized that you can not dynamically set the filename using stream result (at least that is my impression after a few hours of tweaking around the code). I ended up extending StreamResult to set contentDisposition dynamically. I think it would be worthwhile

Re: Upgrading to struts 2.0.11.2 breaks all xml validators

2008-07-07 Thread Struts Two
I have already opened JIRA WW-2709 for this issue and I just attached a sample validator that fails after the upgrade. - Original Message From: Rene Gielen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Struts Developers List Sent: Monday, July 7, 2008 8:07:09 AM Subject: Re: Upgrading to struts 2.0.11.2 brea

Re: Upgrading to struts 2.0.11.2 breaks all xml validators

2008-07-07 Thread Rene Gielen
Hi, This would be a serious problem if we could reproduce it. I took a look in the code of ValidatorFileParser for the 2.0.5 tag, and it should not act other than before. Could you please open a jira issue for this problem (https://issues.apache.org/struts/), and attach a validator xml file that i