Re: [s2] Improved Velocity Integration

2008-09-17 Thread Don Brown
Ah, that does look a lot better. I still wish velocity supported named parameters, but this is better than nothing. Could you file a ticket for this improvement please, and if you have time to write a patch, it would certainly be appreciated :) Don On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 7:12 AM, Christopher S

[s2] Improved Velocity Integration

2008-09-17 Thread Christopher Schultz
All, I'm an S1 user and a member of the Velocity team. I recently posted a message to the velocity-dev list regarding the ugly syntax required by the S2 tag Velocity implementation. For reference: http://www.nabble.com/Named-macro-parameters-td19459070.html The gist of the question was: can Velo

Re: Client-side validation extensions

2008-09-17 Thread Jeromy Evans
Dave Newton wrote: Any more comments? The question has come up a few times on the user list in the last week or two. My proposal is an incremental improvement (if tiny); if we switch to commons-validator at least their JavaScript code could be re-used. Dave I still say go with the increm

[S2] - Bamboo S2 Main Build still failing

2008-09-17 Thread Nils-Helge Garli Hegvik
It looks like there's still problems with a missing xwork snapshot artifact in the local maven repository used in the build. Does anyone know how to fix this? If someone tell me how and I have the right permissions I'd be happy to resolve the issue myself. Nils-H -