On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 4:20 AM, dusty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So the more I think about it the more thoughts I have
>
> The major users like Atlassian and Google forked Webwork a while ago I think
> and they don't run their stuff off the Struts2 code base. Don has been
> awesome for St
dusty wrote:
So we get more aggressive with our releases. We definitely want to preserve
compatibility but if we have a good reason for breaking compatibility we let
people know and show them how to migrate. At the same time we get more
aggressive with marketing, by overhauling the website, gett
Wendy Smoak wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Bob Tiernay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I get the sense that CI + Maven is a like wrestling with a slinky. Is this
problem endemic to s2? What do other open source projects do to alleviate
this?
The release process here could be *much
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Bob Tiernay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I get the sense that CI + Maven is a like wrestling with a slinky. Is this
> problem endemic to s2? What do other open source projects do to alleviate
> this?
The release process here could be *much* simpler, but it's reall
These are the steps:
http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/creating-and-signing-a-struts-21x-distribution.html
If they were easier, and there's got to be a way to make it easier, builds
would be coming out more often I am sure.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 9:50 PM, dusty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
So the more I think about it the more thoughts I have
The major users like Atlassian and Google forked Webwork a while ago I think
and they don't run their stuff off the Struts2 code base. Don has been
awesome for Struts2, but I don't know if there are any other commiters from
Atlassian or G
Jeromy Evans - Blue Sky Minds wrote:
>
> I share similar sentiment. Whenever I take a critical look as to whether
> to use struts2 I keep coming back to the conclusion that it's
> fundamentally sound as far as java frameworks go.
> I'd categorize the problem as not enough generals. Most of u
I get the sense that CI + Maven is a like wrestling with a slinky. Is this
problem endemic to s2? What do other open source projects do to alleviate
this?
My #1 issue is that it's *too difficult and time-consuming to create a
release* on the 2.1 trunk. If releases are difficult and dependent
dusty wrote:
How do we tackle all this? Do we have a meeting? Do we create a Chief who
can make decisions for better or for worse? Clearly decisions need to be
made. Do we start StrutsCon 2009 and lock everyone in a room until the
decisions are made? I started to also write apps in Rails an
Nvm, did found it myself.
--
Bitte senden Sie mir keine Word- oder PowerPoint-Anhänge.
Siehe http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.de.html
Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a
completely unintentional side effect."
-- Linus Torvalds
smime.p7s
Descr
Hi.
I want to debug some bug and need some infos about the url Tag.
How are parameters merged to the parameter map which are specified by the
s:param Tag (2.0.11.2).
Can anyone point me to some code lines where this is done?
Looking at the URL Class, parameters merging is done in the startTag and
11 matches
Mail list logo