--- On Sat, 12/20/08, Matt Raible wrote:
> Do we have a plugins area we can check it into? I'd be interested
> in helping update this project to the latest version of Dojo.
It's already in the "plugins" directory. The (potential) issue with leaving it
there is the implied support. Maybe we coul
+1
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> This is the documentation:
> http://cwiki.apache.org/S2PLUGINS/java-templates-plugin.html
> And it is in the sandbox (hence the vote):
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/sandbox/trunk/struts2-javatemplates-plugin/
>
> musachy
>
>
Do we have a plugins area we can check it into? I'd be interested in
helping update this project to the latest version of Dojo.
Matt
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 11:45 AM, Martin Cooper wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:27 AM, James Holmes wrote:
>
>> +1 and agree with Dave on moving the Dojo stuff
This is the documentation:
http://cwiki.apache.org/S2PLUGINS/java-templates-plugin.html
And it is in the sandbox (hence the vote):
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/sandbox/trunk/struts2-javatemplates-plugin/
musachy
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Paul Benedict wrote:
> Can you please pro
Can you please provide a link and a distribution for me to look at?
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Rainer Hermanns wrote:
> +1
> cheers,
> Rainer
>
>> yes ;)
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Martin Cooper wrote:
>>> Is this intended to be a [VOTE] thread?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Martin Cooper
>>>
You'll probably want to post this on the struts-user list; struts-dev is for
the developers of Struts itself.
You may also wish to list your tutorial on the S2 wiki.
Dave
--- On Sat, 12/20/08, licicin wrote:
From: licicin
Subject: Step by Step Struts 2 tutorial
To: dev@struts.apache.org
Date
Hi,
i started Struts 2 tutorial http://www.onepd.com/
The Struts 2 tutorial will help the reader truly understand Struts 2
concepts, it starts with simple examples and explains not only how to use
Struts' features, but also how certain features work under the hood;
Integrates Struts 2 applicatio
+1
cheers,
Rainer
> yes ;)
>
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Martin Cooper wrote:
>> Is this intended to be a [VOTE] thread?
>>
>> --
>> Martin Cooper
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Musachy Barroso
>> wrote:
>>
>>> As mentioned on the other thread I's like to propose to move the j
ÐÑивеÑÑÑвÑем пÑедпÑиÑÑÐ¸Ñ ÐкаÑеÑинбÑÑга!
ÐедоволÑÐ½Ñ Ð²ÐµÐ´ÐµÐ½Ð¸ÐµÐ¼ бÑÑ
.ÑÑеÑа на
пÑедпÑиÑÑии?
ХоÑиÑе ÑокÑаÑиÑÑ ÑаÑÑ
Ð¾Ð´Ñ Ð² ÑÑловиÑÑ
ÑинанÑового кÑизиÑа?
ÐÑÑ
од здеÑÑ:
ÐÐÐ
yes ;)
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Martin Cooper wrote:
> Is this intended to be a [VOTE] thread?
>
> --
> Martin Cooper
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
>
>> As mentioned on the other thread I's like to propose to move the java
>> tags out of the sandbox into
Is this intended to be a [VOTE] thread?
--
Martin Cooper
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> As mentioned on the other thread I's like to propose to move the java
> tags out of the sandbox into the core plugins bundled with the
> distribution, so they will be part of the
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:27 AM, James Holmes wrote:
> +1 and agree with Dave on moving the Dojo stuff into a plugin that is
> hosted
> somewhere else and can be maintained by more people.
I'm fine with deprecating it, but I'm not in favour of just dumping it at
Google Code in the hope that som
+1
Nils-H
Den 20. des.. 2008 kl. 19.24 skrev "Musachy Barroso"
:
As mentioned on the other thread I's like to propose to move the java
tags out of the sandbox into the core plugins bundled with the
distribution, so they will be part of the 2.1 release.
here is +1
musachy
--
"Hey you! Woul
+1
Den 20. des.. 2008 kl. 19.27 skrev "James Holmes"
:
+1 and agree with Dave on moving the Dojo stuff into a plugin that
is hosted
somewhere else and can be maintained by more people.
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Dave Newton
wrote:
--- On Sat, 12/20/08, Musachy Barroso wrote:
+1 and agree with Dave on moving the Dojo stuff into a plugin that is hosted
somewhere else and can be maintained by more people.
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Dave Newton wrote:
> --- On Sat, 12/20/08, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> > We have talked about this Ad nauseam, and it is obvious that
>
++1
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 1:24 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> As mentioned on the other thread I's like to propose to move the java
> tags out of the sandbox into the core plugins bundled with the
> distribution, so they will be part of the 2.1 release.
>
> here is +1
>
> musachy
> --
> "Hey you
As mentioned on the other thread I's like to propose to move the java
tags out of the sandbox into the core plugins bundled with the
distribution, so they will be part of the 2.1 release.
here is +1
musachy
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
-
I think the tags are in a good shape. I ran this page multiple times:
http://rafb.net/p/JTjD0k17.html
the average rendering time for the java tags is 4.75 seconds, and the
average for the FM tags is 19 seconds (running with a warm cache,
running them with a cold cache would be slower). I found a
--- On Sat, 12/20/08, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> We have talked about this Ad nauseam, and it is obvious that
> we don't have anyone willing to fix all the current bugs,
> upgrade the Dojo plugin, or write a replacement. 2.1 is
> around the corner and I think we should let users know
> that the D
We have talked about this Ad nauseam, and it is obvious that we don't
have anyone willing to fix all the current bugs, upgrade the Dojo
plugin, or write a replacement. 2.1 is around the corner and I think
we should let users know that the Dojo plugin won't be maintained
anymore. So my proposal is
2008/12/20 Nils-Helge Garli Hegvik :
> Would the problem go away if it did?
Do you mean incompatibility? Probably.
But, if I was you, I would correct the problem only if you *are*
interested in using Struts2+Tiles.
If not, let someone else correct it, e.g. some "freeloader" (as Ted
Husted calls th
Would the problem go away if it did?
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Antonio wrote:
> 2008/12/19 Musachy Barroso :
>> can someone with either porltets or tiles experience look into them?
>
> I can help "externally" since I know about Tiles but almost nothing
> about Struts 2.
> I think the bigg
2008/12/19 Musachy Barroso :
> can someone with either porltets or tiles experience look into them?
I can help "externally" since I know about Tiles but almost nothing
about Struts 2.
I think the biggest problem is the StrutsTilesListener that is
incompatible with Tiles 2.1.
Antonio
I know portlets, but I'm not that familiar with tiles... I need some
input from someone who does until I know what to fix...
Nils-H
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> I agree. If nobody can take care of them at the moment, then lets
> re-schedule them
>
> musachy
>
> On Fr
24 matches
Mail list logo
