2.1.5 release quality

2009-01-02 Thread Jeromy Evans
I finally made time to convert some 2.1.3-SNAPSHOT applications to the current trunk (2.1.6-SNAPSHOT). All use a combination of the REST, Convention (replacing CodeBehind) and Tiles plugins. Result: SUCCESS (eventually). Nice work! I've redeployed a sample application at http://www.bluesk

Re: beta testers needed for java templates

2009-01-02 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2009/1/2 Musachy Barroso : > It is under struts2 trunk(plugins/javatemplates). Thanks, I already found it ;-) Regards -- Lukasz http://www.lenart.org.pl/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For addition

Re: beta testers needed for java templates

2009-01-02 Thread Musachy Barroso
It is under struts2 trunk(plugins/javatemplates). musachy On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > 2008/12/16 Musachy Barroso : >> 1.Check out src from >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/sandbox/trunk/struts2-javatemplates-plugin > > I've been trying to checkout a clear cop

Re: beta testers needed for java templates

2009-01-02 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2008/12/16 Musachy Barroso : > 1.Check out src from > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/sandbox/trunk/struts2-javatemplates-plugin I've been trying to checkout a clear copy but I've got 404 Not Found, where can I found the source to build it up? Regards -- Lukasz http://www.lenart.org.pl/

Re: 2.1.4 release quality

2009-01-02 Thread Musachy Barroso
2.1.5 is up: http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.5/ musachy On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Musachy Barroso wrote: > I just kicked it off :) > > musachy > > On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Al Sutton wrote: >> Sounds like a plan to me :). >> >> Al. >> >> Musachy Barroso wrote: >>> >>> y

Re: 2.1.4 release quality

2009-01-02 Thread Musachy Barroso
I just kicked it off :) musachy On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Al Sutton wrote: > Sounds like a plan to me :). > > Al. > > Musachy Barroso wrote: >> >> yes, the bug is in ServletUrlRenderer which should pass the whole >> "action" to the url builder helper, instead of just the "actionName". >>

Re: 2.1.4 release quality

2009-01-02 Thread Al Sutton
Sounds like a plan to me :). Al. Musachy Barroso wrote: yes, the bug is in ServletUrlRenderer which should pass the whole "action" to the url builder helper, instead of just the "actionName". It is fixed on trunk (https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2944). This would affect the REST plu

Re: 2.1.4 release quality

2009-01-02 Thread James Holmes
+1 for 2.1.5 build. Thanks for tirelessly working to get a 2.1 GA release out! On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Musachy Barroso wrote: > yes, the bug is in ServletUrlRenderer which should pass the whole > "action" to the url builder helper, instead of just the "actionName". > It is fixed on trun

Re: 2.1.4 release quality

2009-01-02 Thread Musachy Barroso
yes, the bug is in ServletUrlRenderer which should pass the whole "action" to the url builder helper, instead of just the "actionName". It is fixed on trunk (https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2944). This would affect the REST plugin, which is one of the main things in 2.1, so I think we m

Re: 2.1.4 release quality

2009-01-02 Thread Al Sutton
OK, The problem seems to come in UrlHelper.buildURL on line 174 of ServletUrlRenderer which is only be utilised when the action referred to in the form tag is not explicitly defined (as is the case with actions using the REST plugin). The buildURL is passed the actionName (/releases/7661) but