Re: 2.1.5 release quality

2009-01-03 Thread Jeromy Evans
On 04/01/2009, at 6:48 AM, Musachy Barroso wrote: Ok, this is implemented in trunk and the doc was updated. I removed "disableJarScanning" and "excludeJars" and added "includeJars". Only jars whose URL matches one of the regexes in "struts.convention.action.includeJars" will be scanned. https:

Re: missing volunteers

2009-01-03 Thread Wes Wannemacher
On Sat, 2009-01-03 at 16:39 -0600, Paul Benedict wrote: > Maybe we shouldn't speak up... if you're not listed as a volunteer, > perhaps you should be paid :-) > What? You guys don't get paid? I always wondered why Martin wanted me to keep quiet on it... /on my way to the bank to cash my imagina

Re: missing volunteers

2009-01-03 Thread Paul Benedict
Maybe we shouldn't speak up... if you're not listed as a volunteer, perhaps you should be paid :-) Paul On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Martin Cooper wrote: > On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote: > >> It seems like some of us are missing from the volunteers page: >> http://str

Re: missing volunteers

2009-01-03 Thread Martin Cooper
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote: > It seems like some of us are missing from the volunteers page: > http://struts.apache.org/volunteers.html, at least Wes, Jeromy and > that other I. I checked svn and we are in the volunteers.xml file: > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/stru

missing volunteers

2009-01-03 Thread Musachy Barroso
It seems like some of us are missing from the volunteers page: http://struts.apache.org/volunteers.html, at least Wes, Jeromy and that other I. I checked svn and we are in the volunteers.xml file: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/struts/site/src/site/xdoc/dev/volunteers.xml?view=markup It seems like

Re: 2.1.5 release quality

2009-01-03 Thread Jeromy Evans
On 04/01/2009, at 4:17 AM, Musachy Barroso wrote: 2. I am not sure about the camel case problem. I guess we could add another flag to search for camel-cased results, instead of the default. I am on the fence for this one, as actions names are built with "-" by default, and the idea behind the c

struts(xwork really) and mvel

2009-01-03 Thread Musachy Barroso
For those interested in the MVEL integration, I uploaded what I have so far to: http://svn.opensymphony.com/svn/xwork/branches/xwork-mvel/ There is plenty of stuff to be done, bot some nice things like the magic population of lists, employee[1].name = "el zorro" are working. and a MVELValueStack

Re: 2.1.5 release quality

2009-01-03 Thread Musachy Barroso
Ok, this is implemented in trunk and the doc was updated. I removed "disableJarScanning" and "excludeJars" and added "includeJars". Only jars whose URL matches one of the regexes in "struts.convention.action.includeJars" will be scanned. https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2947 If everythi

Re: S2.1.5

2009-01-03 Thread Musachy Barroso
fixed in trunk. musachy On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote: > Was 1.3.10 released recently? We probably just need to update the dependency. > > musachy > > On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 4:44 AM, Al Sutton wrote: >> Any reason S1.3.9-core is included when 1.3.10 is listed as the lat

Re: S2.1.5

2009-01-03 Thread Musachy Barroso
Was 1.3.10 released recently? We probably just need to update the dependency. musachy On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 4:44 AM, Al Sutton wrote: > Any reason S1.3.9-core is included when 1.3.10 is listed as the latest GA? > > Al. > > -- > == > Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales wit

Re: 2.1.5 release quality

2009-01-03 Thread Musachy Barroso
Thanks for the feedback Jeromy! Things to point out: 1. If we add a setting like "includeJars", and get rid of "excludeJars" (very simple change, code wise), then we can enable jar scanning by default. I totally agree with this. 2. I am not sure about the camel case problem. I guess we could add a

Re: 2.1.4 release quality

2009-01-03 Thread Al Sutton
2.1.5 looks good to me. Al. Musachy Barroso wrote: 2.1.5 is up: http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.5/ musachy On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Musachy Barroso wrote: I just kicked it off :) musachy On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Al Sutton wrote: Sounds like a plan to m

S2.1.5

2009-01-03 Thread Al Sutton
Any reason S1.3.9-core is included when 1.3.10 is listed as the latest GA? Al. -- == Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales with the company number 6741909. The registered head office is Kemp House, 152-160 City Road, London, EC1V 2NX, UK. The views expressed in this em