Re: Struts 2.1.6 not working with Struts 2 JSON Plugin

2009-01-15 Thread dusty
Ah nice, I can get rid of my local copy. That is one of those things where you say, "I should send that out" and then someone else does it. James Holmes-2 wrote: > > Cool, I rolled a new 0.33 release. Thanks for the info everyone. > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Jeromy Evans < > jerom

Re: thoughts on CI

2009-01-15 Thread Wes Wannemacher
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 12:02 -0700, Wendy Smoak wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Wes Wannemacher wrote: > > > Okay, so I've got my account setup on the Apache Hudson instance. > ... > > assembly is a great way for me to generate nightlies, and it is sort of > > a matter of eating our own

RE: NPE in xwork

2009-01-15 Thread Dan Sullivan
Looks awfully familiar. I was having issues earlier and opened this: http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/XW-669 Sorry for not including the stack trace in XW-669, but I'm pretty sure that was it. Of course, my problem was with WebSphere specifically, but maybe it's something related. -

Re: NPE in xwork

2009-01-15 Thread Lukasz Lenart
JDK 1.6_11 Regards -- Lukasz http://www.lenart.org.pl/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org

Re: NPE in xwork

2009-01-15 Thread Musachy Barroso
I works for me too, but as I said in the user mailing list, looking at the code, the potential for the NPE is there, I just don't see how to trigger it. musachy On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > 2009/1/15 Lukasz Lenart : >>> is anybody having this problem? >> >> Nope, works

Re: NPE in xwork

2009-01-15 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2009/1/15 Lukasz Lenart : >> is anybody having this problem? > > Nope, works for me, 2.1.6 + convention + javatemplates + spring + > tiles + config-browser > Only one mine struts.xml, devMode set in struts.properties I put devMode only in struts.xml, still works Regards -- Lukasz http://www.len

RE: Dojo plugin deprecated

2009-01-15 Thread Gustave Pheiffers
Just to be clear, I'm not complaining about the Dojo plugin being deprecated ( I understand the reasons for deprecation ). I was just trying to determine the future of the Struts Ajax mailto:mfncoo...@gmail.com]on Behalf Of Martin Cooper Sent: Thursday, 15 January 2009 7:36 p.m. To: Struts Devel

Re: NPE in xwork

2009-01-15 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2009/1/15 Musachy Barroso : > is anybody having this problem? Nope, works for me, 2.1.6 + convention + javatemplates + spring + tiles + config-browser Only one mine struts.xml, devMode set in struts.properties Regards -- Lukasz http://www.lenart.org.pl/

NPE in xwork

2009-01-15 Thread Musachy Barroso
This is the 2nd report of a NPE coming from xwork when devMode is set: https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2956 is anybody having this problem? musachy -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd - To

Re: thoughts on CI

2009-01-15 Thread Wendy Smoak
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Wes Wannemacher wrote: > Okay, so I've got my account setup on the Apache Hudson instance. ... > assembly is a great way for me to generate nightlies, and it is sort of > a matter of eating our own dogfood. If the assembly doesn't do what we > want, we should mak

Re: thoughts on CI

2009-01-15 Thread Piero Sartini
> But, the problem with this was that wget honors > the new robots.txt file which means wget refuses to pull it down. wget should ignore the robots.txt with the option -erobots=off (or add the line robots=off in .wgetrc) Piero ---

Re: thoughts on CI

2009-01-15 Thread Musachy Barroso
> Now, my first question is more general. Hudson allows a few different > triggers for launching builds. Right now, I'm telling it to check SVN > once a day for changes. To me, this is sufficient, but not quite as > comprehensive as Bamboo. I'm thinking that since this is a shared > resource (and w

thoughts on CI

2009-01-15 Thread Wes Wannemacher
Okay, so I've got my account setup on the Apache Hudson instance. I've also setup some struts builds. If you want to take a look, they are running here - http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/view/Struts/ Right now, these builds are pretty much a vanilla setup. They are not publishing snapshots

Re: Struts 2.1.6 not working with Struts 2 JSON Plugin

2009-01-15 Thread James Holmes
Cool, I rolled a new 0.33 release. Thanks for the info everyone. On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Jeromy Evans < jeromy.ev...@blueskyminds.com.au> wrote: > I've used it with 2.1. If I recall correctly, only the unit tests needed > to be modified. > There's a patch sitting on my machine "jsonplug

Re: Dojo plugin deprecated

2009-01-15 Thread Dave Newton
Rene Gielen wrote: Hmm, that is not what I am experiencing - I know a lot of people using the dojo tags for exactly what it is capable right now, basically doing some asynchronous page updates and form validation. I said this once a long time ago; I'll throw it out again now. I think a core (

Re: Dojo plugin deprecated

2009-01-15 Thread Musachy Barroso
In fact the tags are a lot better in 2.1 than they were in 2.0. The problem is that for a long time we (as in struts 2 committers) have stopped trying to catch up with Dojo versions and updating the tags accordingly. This deprecation is the official announcement of my previous sentence. If they nev

Re: Dojo plugin deprecated

2009-01-15 Thread Andreas Joseph Krogh
Frank W. Zammetti wrote: I don't know, I think Andreas' point has at least some validity... the page he linked to does in fact state: "*First-class AJAX support* - Add interactivity and flexibility with AJAX tags that look and feel just like standard Struts tags." Seems like if that's no lon

Re: Dojo plugin deprecated

2009-01-15 Thread Rene Gielen
Guys, Am Do, 15.01.2009, 07:36, schrieb Martin Cooper: > Let's be clear about this. > > * Lots of people think that the Dojo-based AJAX tags would be useful if > they > worked with the latest versions of Dojo, or some other toolkit. > * Few, if any, people want to use them in their current form.

Re: Dojo plugin deprecated

2009-01-15 Thread Al Sutton
+1 for removing the First-Class AJAX support line. Al. Frank W. Zammetti wrote: I don't know, I think Andreas' point has at least some validity... the page he linked to does in fact state: "*First-class AJAX support* - Add interactivity and flexibility with AJAX tags that look and feel just