I forgot to say, we can roll a build without trouble, we just need to
release xwork first (I don't think there is any blocker for xwork).
musachy
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> 2.1.7 has bug fixes and some small changes in Convention, nothing big.
>
> musachy
>
> On Fr
2.1.7 has bug fixes and some small changes in Convention, nothing big.
musachy
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Don Brown wrote:
> Off the top of my head:
> * Split out the XML parser from XmlConfigurationProvider so that you
> can parse XML from any source
> * Get rid of all the Class.forName()
Interesting. On the Guice list there is another thread about GAE. You
should submit a bug for Sitemesh to Google and to the Sitemesh
maintainers. Google seems to be up for fixing some of these issues.
This one looks like either a JNDI bug or JNDI security measure (my
guess is the later). Ei
Off the top of my head:
* Split out the XML parser from XmlConfigurationProvider so that you
can parse XML from any source
* Get rid of all the Class.forName() calls in XWork
I'd rather not do this on a stable branch, particularly since new
public classes will be created. How many changes are the
having a property for that makes sense. I will take a look over the
weekend and see if I can figure out how to make sitemesh work.
musachy
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Don Brown wrote:
> Huzzah, it works. Once I removed sitemesh, the simple starter app
> works: http://struts2-demo.appspot.
I think we are good. What changes do you have in mind?, the OSGi
plugin could take advantage of some refactoring of xwork so I am
interested :)
musachy
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 8:24 AM, Don Brown wrote:
> Now that 2.1 is GA (thanks guys and gals), are we ready to branch it
> off and move trunk t
Now that 2.1 is GA (thanks guys and gals), are we ready to branch it
off and move trunk to 2.2? I was wanting to do some refactoring of
how XWork configuration is loaded and parsed, but new classes and the
like really isn't appropriate for a patch/micro release.
Any objections to the branching?
