Re: XWork - Overriding interceptors in sub package (XW-554)

2009-04-24 Thread Musachy Barroso
Configuration is semi-inmutable(oxymoron?), you can add and remove packages, but you cannot modify an action config, or a package config. You can also reload the whole configuration, which is what Convention and the XML config do when files are modified. musachy On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 1:05 PM, R

Re: Ready for Struts 2.2 and XWork 2.2?

2009-04-24 Thread Musachy Barroso
We should include/improve a flash result/scope for 2.2: https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2635 an yes, we should start drafting some sort of roadmap. musachy On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Rene Gielen wrote: > to add some ideas that came to my mind lately: > > Rework on i18n suppor

Re: XWork - Overriding interceptors in sub package (XW-554)

2009-04-24 Thread Rene Gielen
although hard to realize, I find the idea really intriguing. Given e.g. you would provide a NoOperationInterceptor, it would let you selectively disable interceptors when needed, without repeating stack configs. Given the configuration immutability, how does the JavaRebel Struts2 plugin work - anyb

Re: about OGNL and parameter binding

2009-04-24 Thread Musachy Barroso
oh yeah, this would definitely go into another branch. I am almost done with it, I am adding more tests. musachy On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Rene Gielen wrote: > Great stuff! > > wouldn't that be a good topic for the XW/S 2.2 branches discussed lately? > > Musachy Barroso schrieb: >> Not y

Re: about OGNL and parameter binding

2009-04-24 Thread Rene Gielen
Great stuff! wouldn't that be a good topic for the XW/S 2.2 branches discussed lately? Musachy Barroso schrieb: > Not yet, the MVEL stuff is pretty much a draft at this moment. We > could roll this in 2 steps, first stop using OGNL for parameter > binding, and then, plugin MVEL. After #1 is achie

Re: Ready for Struts 2.2 and XWork 2.2?

2009-04-24 Thread Rene Gielen
to add some ideas that came to my mind lately: Rework on i18n support 1. create a TextProviderNextGen component that can easily be used and injected 2. create a TextProvider interceptor which - sets up a TextProvider - sets it on an Action implementing TextProviderAware interface - pushe

Re: Moving struts assembly to a profile

2009-04-24 Thread Wes Wannemacher
Rene, I went ahead and did it yesterday. Now, if you want to build everything except mirror the wiki and zip up everything, just do - mvn clean install -DskipAssembly I know in my case, it shaves off 10 minutes from a 15 minute build. -Wes On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Rene Gielen wrote:

Re: Moving struts assembly to a profile

2009-04-24 Thread Rene Gielen
+42.5 at least ... Rainer Hermanns schrieb: > Wes, > > +42, please do so... that was disturbing me as well a lot :) > The build takes currently "forever", just to download all the docs. > > Thanks, > Rainer > >> Hey guys, >> >> Unless someone can raise a decent reason not to do it, I'd like to

Re: Moving struts assembly to a profile

2009-04-24 Thread Rene Gielen
Great, I built a few times yesterday and wasn't aware of the already existing change. This is a real time (and nerve..) saver! BTW, did not know that property inversion with ! works. Always good to have a Maven guru on board *wavingHandsTowardsWendy* Wes Wannemacher schrieb: > Rene, > > I went a

Re: XWork 2.1.3 released

2009-04-24 Thread Musachy Barroso
thanks Rainer. musachy On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Rainer Hermanns wrote: > Hi, > > I just released XWork 2.1.3... > So, as soon as the maven repositories are mirrored, we could start with > the Struts 2.1.7 release. > > cheers, > Rainer > > > -- > Rainer Hermanns > aixcept > Willibrordstra

XWork 2.1.3 released

2009-04-24 Thread Rainer Hermanns
Hi, I just released XWork 2.1.3... So, as soon as the maven repositories are mirrored, we could start with the Struts 2.1.7 release. cheers, Rainer -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22