Yep, agreed...
I just commited some more fixes for XWork 2.1.4.
There are just two more left for now (Haven't checked Struts2 Jira for
others yet).
If someone likes to address the one or the other, you're welcome :)
thanks,
Rainer
> I am +1 for waiting, so far the biggest problem with convention
I am +1 for waiting, so far the biggest problem with convention has
been to get the classpath scanner to work right in different
containers, and this would fix it for weblogic.
musachy
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Rainer Hermanns wrote:
> I just committed your patch for XW-693, thanks!
> Wes
Okay, that should be fine... At one point last week, I pointed Struts
2 to use Xwork 2.1.3, so we need to point it back to 2.1.4-SNAPSHOT,
if anyone has the source handy.
-Wes
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Rainer Hermanns wrote:
> I just committed your patch for XW-693, thanks!
> Wes, if we w
I just committed your patch for XW-693, thanks!
Wes, if we wait for the xwork-2.1.4 release next week we
can commit WW-3110 as well for 2.1.7.
cheers,
Rainer
> Plese, consider commiting:
>
> * emptyOption attribute ignored in select tag (Java Templates) ww-3103
> (patch attached to issue)
>
> And
I can wait a little bit... I don't want to push the release out too
far, though, there are a lot of updates going out (over 90 JIRAs
closed for 2.1.7 at last count). So, we can give it a little time. If
you need help getting an XWork release ready, let me know I can jump
in over there and help out
Wes,
thanks for taking action.
I'd like to commit a change to the sitemesh-plugin and upgrade
the dependency to 2.4.2 to be GAE compliant.
This needs to be tested first in showcase, but then I'd be
done for the 2.1.7 release.
Regarding the xwork patches for WebLogic support I'd be open
as well, b
Thanks! Will ask the question on user list.
Just curious, Is there any book/document/block discussing 'design and
evolution' of struts and why certain design decisions were taken?
> Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 11:31:50 +0200
> Subject: RE: ModelDriven, a wrong choice of interface?
> From: gie...
I went ahead and marked WW-3110 for 2.1.8. I'll take a look at ww-3103
right now.
-Wes
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> I would have wanted to get that weblogic (and other container
> probably) problem fixed for 2.1.7, but xwork was released already
> (patch was provided
I would have wanted to get that weblogic (and other container
probably) problem fixed for 2.1.7, but xwork was released already
(patch was provided after the release).
musachy
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Jordi Fernandez
wrote:
> Plese, consider commiting:
>
> * emptyOption attribute ignored
Plese, consider commiting:
* emptyOption attribute ignored in select tag (Java Templates) ww-3103
(patch attached to issue)
And these two issues (one for struts 2 and the other for xwork) to
enable deployment in weblogic:
* Use new constructor of XWork class UrlSet to specify ClassLoader
protoco
On Tuesday 05 May 2009 02:33:14 pm Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> Unless anyone has anything they want to commit first...
>
> I'll give it a couple of hours while I read the docs on releasing.
I don't want to hold the release, but I noticed this:
Enabling this in struts.xml makes it possible to have "
The vote was open for approximately 7 days and here is the tally -
Nils +1 GA
Rainer +1 GA
Musachy +1 GA
So, adding myself (+1 GA), that is 4 binding GA votes. I am going to
go ahead and push it out.
-Wes
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> The Struts Master 5 test build
Unless anyone has anything they want to commit first...
I'll give it a couple of hours while I read the docs on releasing.
-Wes
--
Wes Wannemacher
Author - Struts 2 In Practice
Includes coverage of Struts 2.1, Spring, JPA, JQuery, Sitemesh and more
http://www.manning.com/wannemacher
--
Do I need to send an announcement to the u...@struts list? This one is
just part of the build, so I'm not sure if it affects anyone...
Martin? Is there a policy about announcing all releases?
-Wes
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> The vote was open for approximately 7 days
You seem to be addressing the wrong issues with ModelDriven. The sole
purpose of ModelDriven is to push the exposed model property on top of
your stack (where usually your Action resides), which maps great for many
CRUD like usecases - and, as we know, for many people out there.
Actually there is
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Erlend Oftedal wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Arshan Dabirsiaghi from OWASP has published a gap analysis of application
> security in Struts2. The full report can be found here:
> http://www.owasp.org/images/b/be/A_Gap_Analysis_of_Application_Security_in_Struts2.pdf
Very intere
16 matches
Mail list logo
