Re: (Not a vote) Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.8.1 Vote

2009-11-13 Thread Musachy Barroso
Sorry to hear that Dave, good to know you are out there :) musachy On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 7:03 PM, Dave Newton wrote: > Just dropping a note to let folks know I'm alive, and won't have a chance to > look at this for another week or so. A death in the family, a new job, and > life kinda took ove

(Not a vote) Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.8.1 Vote

2009-11-13 Thread Dave Newton
Just dropping a note to let folks know I'm alive, and won't have a chance to look at this for another week or so. A death in the family, a new job, and life kinda took over for a bit there :/ Dave Wes Wannemacher wrote: The Struts 2.1.8 test build is now available. Release notes: * [http://c

Re: Releasing a Maven-based project

2009-11-13 Thread Musachy Barroso
we are missing the nexus part, we could consider that. musachy On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Martin Cooper wrote: > Some of you may have seen this posted on the Incubator General list, > but I thought this page, written up by Maven's Brett Porter, was worth > sharing here too. It's a great su

Releasing a Maven-based project

2009-11-13 Thread Martin Cooper
Some of you may have seen this posted on the Incubator General list, but I thought this page, written up by Maven's Brett Porter, was worth sharing here too. It's a great summary of what it takes to release an Apache project that's built with Maven. http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/apach

Re: xwork: TextProviderSupport vs DefaultTextProvider

2009-11-13 Thread Musachy Barroso
If I don't remember wrong the DefaultTextProvider is pushed into the stack, so i18n works, and TextProviderSupport is used statically from different places. musachy On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > What is the difference between those two? I read comments but it isn't > st

xwork: TextProviderSupport vs DefaultTextProvider

2009-11-13 Thread Lukasz Lenart
What is the difference between those two? I read comments but it isn't still clear for me why we have two different implementation. It looks like DefaultTextProvider is used for testing and bootstrap (as "system" bean). But TextProviderSupport is used for everything else. Any thoughts? Regards -

Re: Archetypes

2009-11-13 Thread Musachy Barroso
I don't know how the archetypes are released, but it is probably the same as the main distro. It will deploy to the staging repository, you start a vote, and if it passes, then you need to manually copy it to the main dir, and from there it is copied automatically to the maven repo. musachy On Fr

Re: Archetypes

2009-11-13 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2009/11/13 Musachy Barroso : > Any plans to deploy them now that 2.1.8.1 is out? After voting on them > of course :) Next week I've been planing to start a vote, if I learn how Maven release process is working ;-) Regards -- Lukasz http://www.lenart.org.pl/

Re: Archetypes

2009-11-13 Thread Musachy Barroso
Any plans to deploy them now that 2.1.8.1 is out? After voting on them of course :) musachy On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Musachy Barroso wrote: > 2.1.8.1 should be the next GA, so I would go with that > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Lukasz Lenart > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Should I point al

Re: some love for the documentation

2009-11-13 Thread Musachy Barroso
wrong link: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/S2NewDocDraft/User+Guide On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Musachy Barroso wrote: > I created new space to work on the documentation, the guide main page is here: > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/S2NewDocDraft/Guides > > I think

some love for the documentation

2009-11-13 Thread Musachy Barroso
I created new space to work on the documentation, the guide main page is here: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/S2NewDocDraft/Guides I think it is very important that we clean up the documentation, document missing parts, remove outdated stuff, the "version boxes", and the snippets as w