Actual state:
- JSR286 nature with automatic detection of the API version to use is
implemented, but was not heavily tested till now. For test automation,
we still lack a test container environment for 286 as we had for 168
(customized embedded Pluto)
- Events are not supported, and there is a goo
2011/1/27 Johannes Geppert :
> is there any chance to get the portlet2 plugin out of the sandbox?
> I use this sandbox plugin and it works great except the eventing.
What about the eventing, is it possible to improve that?
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Kapituła Ja
That will be cool if we can collaborate with liferay also for portlet
--Original Message--
From: Johannes Geppert
To: dev@struts.apache.org
ReplyTo: Struts Developers List
Subject: portlet2 plugin
Sent: Jan 27, 2011 1:52 PM
Hi,
is there any chance to get the portlet2 plugin out of the
Hi,
is there any chance to get the portlet2 plugin out of the sandbox?
I use this sandbox plugin and it works great except the eventing.
Johannes
-
---
web: http://www.jgeppert.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/portlet2-plugin-tp
2011/1/27 Maurizio Cucchiara :
> Does anyone know if mvn site:deploy goal works? are there any side
> effects (like file system permissions)?
> or I have to deploy by hand?
Please read the docs
http://struts.apache.org/2.2.1/docs/creating-and-signing-a-struts-22x-distribution.html#CreatingandSigni
There should be no problem to delete it. We have to take care only of
two pages according to google [1]
I have already updated the announcement one. I also upgraded the site
plugin, from now it won't ignore paragraph format (take a look at the
differences between [2] and [3]).
Does anyone know if m
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara
wrote:
> What do you think if we simply replace the old page with a symlink which
> points to the update version?
I see no reason to do that. It's an old, obsolete page, in the wrong
location. The location also predates the ASF requirement that
+1
-Wes
On 1/26/11, Maurizio Cucchiara wrote:
> What do you think if we simply replace the old page with a symlink which
> points to the update version?
>
> Maurizio Cucchiara
>
> On Jan 26, 2011 8:08 PM, "John Lindal" wrote:
> Google lists only 4 pages that link to the old /volunteers.html:
>
What do you think if we simply replace the old page with a symlink which
points to the update version?
Maurizio Cucchiara
On Jan 26, 2011 8:08 PM, "John Lindal" wrote:
Google lists only 4 pages that link to the old /volunteers.html:
http://www.google.com/search?q=link:http://struts.apache.org/
Google lists only 4 pages that link to the old /volunteers.html:
http://www.google.com/search?q=link:http://struts.apache.org/volunteers.html&hl=en
If nobody objects, I'll go ahead and delete it.
I tried building the site from source, but it gave me errors, so I'll leave
that alone :)
Thank
10 matches
Mail list logo